• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Flywheel

  • Thread starter Thread starter 92Fox5.0
  • Start date Start date Jun 22, 2009
9

92Fox5.0

New Member
Jan 19, 2009
13
0
1
Jun 22, 2009
#1
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #1
Hey Guys,

I need some advice. I'm building a 347 stroker and I was wondering if I need an aluminum flywheel or use the steel flywheel. My plans for the car is mostly street and some strip. A friend of mine cautioned me about the aluminum flywheel for street driving. He said that I will need the weight of a steel flywheel to help keep the engine running while driving in town. This is my first build and my first mustang. Any comments / suggestions will be appreciated.

By the way, this is my first post.

Thanks Again,

92Fox
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jun 22, 2009
#2
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #2
your friend is incorrect. alum will be fine but it'll cost more than steel. make sure you get the correct weight balance flywheel. I had zero problems on my old 92 347 stroker w/ an alum flywheel, street ONLY.
 
9

92Fox5.0

New Member
Jan 19, 2009
13
0
1
Jun 25, 2009
#3
  • Jun 25, 2009
  • #3
Thanks for the input GRN92LX!
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jun 25, 2009
#4
  • Jun 25, 2009
  • #4
the aluminum flywheel is going to hurt your low end. up top it will scream. city driving will be fine, but from my experience the car needs more rpms to get moving.
 
9

92Fox5.0

New Member
Jan 19, 2009
13
0
1
Jun 26, 2009
#5
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #5
Thanks Stykthyn.
 

Cobra912

Active Member
May 1, 2005
1,777
11
39
Wish I was anywhere but here
Jun 26, 2009
#6
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #6
stykthyn said:
the aluminum flywheel is going to hurt your low end. up top it will scream. city driving will be fine, but from my experience the car needs more rpms to get moving.
Click to expand...

From the research I did, I agree. I bought a 28oz steel one when I built my 331. Make sure you spend a bit more and buy an SFI one, a little peice of mind that a disc of solid steel won't explode under your feet at 6000 RPM.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jun 26, 2009
#7
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #7
From EXPERIENCE, no problems with my aluminum flywheel on my old STREET car
 
J

Jack's95gt

Member
Aug 15, 2004
443
1
18
Huntingdon Valley, PA
Jun 26, 2009
#8
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #8
A billet steel flywheel will drive more like a stocker. I have to rev up more when pulling out from a stop with the aluminum flywheel.
 

Jaym14

New Member
Jan 26, 2009
296
1
0
Long Island, N.Y.
Jun 27, 2009
#9
  • Jun 27, 2009
  • #9
You will need to rev the engine a little bit more to get the car moving in first with the aluminum flywheel as opposed to the steel which can lead to more clutch slippage. Depending on which clutch/flywheel combo, your driving habits, and how well your clutch is adjusted you might experience rapid disc wear and warping of the steel friction plate on the flywheel. I'm currently in the process of swapping from an aluminum flywheel (anderson high rev about $400) to a billet steel sfi approved ram unit (24lbs $259) because of such wear (not cause by me, see my post in the 5.0 talk section http://forums.stangnet.com/787809-body-shop-fried-my-clutch.html. I decided to go with a steel wheel because even though my car is set up as a drag car, it sees more street time than strip, and I dont want to run the risk of having to replace everything again. Steel flywheels are generally considered the more street friendly choice but I know that plenty of people run aluminum in daily drivers with out incident. In the end it really just comes down to personal preference. Your really splitting hairs when you talk about the potential gains/losses when comparing the two. Steel offers slightly better low end grunt and potentially greater longevity while aluminum will rev like crazy and help your top end but at the risk of less street-ability.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
366
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
A
Need some info on putting a 2002 4.6l in a 1997 gt.
  • Austin4.6l
  • May 29, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
125
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 29, 2025
Austin4.6l
A
C
New mustang owner
  • CPH89LX
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
105
The Welcome Wagon Apr 27, 2026
91AOD5.0LX
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
239
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
512
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?