• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

FMS B spring install

  • Thread starter Thread starter WhiteFizzo
  • Start date Start date Oct 29, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

WhiteFizzo

Founding Member
May 17, 2000
85
0
0
Virginia Beach Va
Oct 29, 2005
#1
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #1
I just installed a set of FMS B springs with prothane insulators, should the front of the car sit this low and is this this too much camber on the wheels. When I drive there is no bump steer. Just wondering.






Ike

 

WhiteFizzo

Founding Member
May 17, 2000
85
0
0
Virginia Beach Va
Oct 29, 2005
#2
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #2
Sorry about the pics. As soon as I posted the previous message my wife came and informed me it was time to go to Walmart. So, let me try again.





The tires arent rubbing, but I thought the drop for the B springs wouldn't be this dramatic. Do I need to think about cc plates and offset steering rack bushings? I went with the B springs in order to try and avoid having to change the steering geometry.

Any suggestions?
 

slvrsn95

New Member
Apr 6, 2005
28
0
1
Oct 29, 2005
#3
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #3
so much for that 3/4 inch drop that they advertise for b and c springs they seem to always drop the front over an inch definately get you some c/c plates and offset steering rack bushings, well worth the investment or else your going to eat up the inner tread on your tires
 

cjman15

Banned
Apr 15, 2004
1,009
0
0
Fairfield, PA
Oct 29, 2005
#4
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #4
I have the C springs in mine and it doesn't look NEAR as low as yours... Which ones are advertised to have more of a drop? I guess it must be the B's... I don't have any rubbing issues 'cept for when I go over any harsh bumps at speeds higher than like 35mph... and even then it's only rubbing on the inner fender well... I don't notice any irregular wear on the tires either.

 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Oct 29, 2005
#5
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #5
B and C give the same drop, its just that the C's are stiffer and specific rate, as is the B's are not

Give it a week for the back to settle, and it wouldn't hurt to throw on some C/C plates and fix your alignment woes
 

Hissing Cobra

Founding Member
Jan 4, 2002
798
0
17
Massachusetts
Oct 29, 2005
#6
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #6
I've got the "B" springs on my Cobra without caster/camber plates. Go to an alignment shop and have them check the alignment. If it's off, it'll be well worth the investment to have it reset. It's possible that you may need caster/camber plates.

After installing my "B" springs and 90/10's in the front, I invested $40.00 for a front end alignment and the shop had no problems dialing it in. I've got approximately 11,000 miles on the tires and they're showing no wear whatsoever.

 

Mavrick

Founding Member
Aug 29, 2002
2,264
0
46
Collingwood, ON
Oct 29, 2005
#7
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #7
My C's with urethane isolators are nowhere near that low.. mine sits about 3/4" higher than yours in the front.
 

tunedin302

I AM the law!!!
Jul 29, 2004
1,251
2
36
Pennsylvania
Oct 30, 2005
#8
  • Oct 30, 2005
  • #8
Did you replace the isolators when you did the install?
 

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Oct 30, 2005
#9
  • Oct 30, 2005
  • #9
Mine doesn't sit anywhere near that low with the same setup. If the tire is leaning in you will most likely have to get a set of C/C plates to correct it.
 

WhiteFizzo

Founding Member
May 17, 2000
85
0
0
Virginia Beach Va
Oct 30, 2005
#10
  • Oct 30, 2005
  • #10
Brand new prothane insulators and FMS B springs. I may just switch back to the stock front springs and leave the B springs in the rear. That might level out the ride height.
 

tunedin302

I AM the law!!!
Jul 29, 2004
1,251
2
36
Pennsylvania
Oct 31, 2005
#11
  • Oct 31, 2005
  • #11
WhiteFizzo said:
Sorry about the pics. As soon as I posted the previous message my wife came and informed me it was time to go to Walmart. So, let me try again.

The tires arent rubbing, but I thought the drop for the B springs wouldn't be this dramatic. Do I need to think about cc plates and offset steering rack bushings? I went with the B springs in order to try and avoid having to change the steering geometry.

Any suggestions?
Click to expand...

Are you running 245/ 50 or 55 series tires up front? If so then that is why it looks so low.
 

WhiteFizzo

Founding Member
May 17, 2000
85
0
0
Virginia Beach Va
Oct 31, 2005
#12
  • Oct 31, 2005
  • #12
Im running 245/50's all the way around. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but a front end alignment wont be enough to correct the negative camber. I'm going to need cc plates for that. Right?

 

tunedin302

I AM the law!!!
Jul 29, 2004
1,251
2
36
Pennsylvania
Oct 31, 2005
#13
  • Oct 31, 2005
  • #13
WhiteFizzo said:
Im running 245/50's all the way around.
Click to expand...

That's the problem. I ran a 225/50/16 for a long time with these springs and it never looked that low (now I run 18s and Eibachs so different story). The 225/50 have a OD of 24.9" and your 245/50 have a OD of 25.6". That means you tire is .35" closer to the fender that the 225/50. There is nothing wrong with your springs, your front tire is too big IMO.
 

tunedin302

I AM the law!!!
Jul 29, 2004
1,251
2
36
Pennsylvania
Oct 31, 2005
#14
  • Oct 31, 2005
  • #14
WhiteFizzo said:
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but a front end alignment wont be enough to correct the negative camber. I'm going to need cc plates for that. Right?
Click to expand...

yes, it is set from the factory with rivets in the shock tower. You can drill them out and attempt to set it but it is unlikely you will have enought adjustment. Did it right and get some CC plates.
 
E

emagdnim

Active Member
Feb 5, 2003
391
15
28
Oct 31, 2005
#15
  • Oct 31, 2005
  • #15
I just picked up a set of C springs how are they for handling ?
 
I

iwashmycar

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 7, 2004
1,236
1
39
Columbus, Ohio
Oct 31, 2005
#16
  • Oct 31, 2005
  • #16
I put the B's on mine too and got a pretty stout rake outta the deal. I also need CC plates since i am killing the inside of my tires. I just deflated them a little to relieve some of the edge pressure....for now





Mine did look like that when I first did it tho. You need to loosen the stock CC plates and pull em all the way to the outside...drilling the rivets if necessary. I also had "smaller" bolts with little nubs on em holding my struts on. I was informed by the dealer that these are for minor adjustment, sorta like a knee....moving the wheels more verticle.
 

CoupedUp

Banned
Aug 26, 2005
260
0
0
Gone Fishing
Oct 31, 2005
#17
  • Oct 31, 2005
  • #17
1 - Your tires aren't too tall ... 25.6 to 25.7" is the factory tire height.
2 - 'B' springs are progressive rate and will compress more than the specific rate 'C's when front end weight is rested upon them giving your car a lower drop ... especially so with iron heads and all accessories
3 - To level your ride height, buy some weight jacker control arms for the rear ... this will also distribute the total vehicle weight a bit too.
4 - Buy C/C plates and offset rack bushings ...
5 - Peace homie.
 

tunedin302

I AM the law!!!
Jul 29, 2004
1,251
2
36
Pennsylvania
Oct 31, 2005
#18
  • Oct 31, 2005
  • #18
CoupedUp said:
1 - Your tires aren't too tall ... 25.6 to 25.7" is the factory tire height.
Click to expand...

I said his tires are too tall IMO b/c when I did my FMS springs my tire sat further away from the fender well. Additionally, the factory size tires obviously didn't come with B springs. We can agree to disagree, but IMO that tire is too tall.
 

CoupedUp

Banned
Aug 26, 2005
260
0
0
Gone Fishing
Oct 31, 2005
#19
  • Oct 31, 2005
  • #19
tunedin302 said:
I said his tires are too tall IMO b/c when I did my FMS springs my tire sat further away from the fender well. Additionally, the factory size tires obviously didn't come with B springs. We can agree to disagree, but IMO that tire is too tall.
Click to expand...

Sure ... for the drop they may be "too tall" ...
Running a shorter sidewall, like a 225/50 on the front, will also drop the chassis a little closer to the ground as well.

I personally run 225/55s on the front and 245/50's on the rear of one of my Stangs. The wider 245's he has now up front aren't horrible, but will rub the plastic more than a narrower 225 will on ponies.

The reason I wouldn't want to run shorter tires on all four is because it throws the speedo off a little more ... I'm a.r. about that kinda stuff. Also with shorter walls, up front only, the car looks like Scooby Doo's Speed Buggy ((ralph))
 

WhiteFizzo

Founding Member
May 17, 2000
85
0
0
Virginia Beach Va
Nov 1, 2005
#20
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #20
Thanks for all the info. I'm still considering my options, but it will probably involve some cc plates and offset steering rack bushings.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
Fox Street Suspension Build Advice
  • NYFox
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
331
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
889
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Fox Alignment Suggestions
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jul 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
481
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 13, 2025
PonyGTrider
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
P
Weird Voltage & Oil Pressure Gauges
  • PNN
  • May 22, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
68
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech May 22, 2026
PNN
P
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?