• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

For the Racers out there

  • Thread starter Thread starter 86bluecobra
  • Start date Start date Jan 7, 2006
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jan 7, 2006
#1
  • Jan 7, 2006
  • #1
Ok i have a question. If you have cars of equal wieght one a auto one a stick both running 150hp shot of juice. one car (stick) runs a 7.74 1/8 mile @ 94 mph the other car (auto with sloshy shifts) runs a 8.2 sec 1/8 mile @ 96 mph . which car makes more hp? using the hp calculators the car running the higher mph has more hp can this be right since he is slower? the 8.2 sec car hooks very well and takes off the car running 7.7 spins through 1st and 2nd gear. I'd like to hear your theory's and why.
 

bobcatv8

Member
Aug 25, 2004
141
1
16
Ocala,FL
Jan 7, 2006
#2
  • Jan 7, 2006
  • #2
From all I've ever heard with car weights being equal the car with the higher MPH is making the most power.
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Jan 7, 2006
#3
  • Jan 7, 2006
  • #3
The 8.2 is losing alot of time in the sloshy shifts.
 

bobcatv8

Member
Aug 25, 2004
141
1
16
Ocala,FL
Jan 7, 2006
#4
  • Jan 7, 2006
  • #4
Or a rotten 60 ft time too.
 

gt40_2003wes

I did sound a wee bit gay there.
Aug 14, 2005
461
2
48
ky
Jan 7, 2006
#5
  • Jan 7, 2006
  • #5
the reason the stick is runnin slower is because its loss of traction.
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Jan 7, 2006
#6
  • Jan 7, 2006
  • #6
the auto only has 4 forward gears where as the stick has 5. this means the stick has a greater torque multiplication factor and is able to achieve its trap speed quicker. when you race 1/8 mile, gears are very important.

the diff in mph may be attributed to diff in the motor itself. maybe the auto car has been maintained a bit better and has less blowby.

my team leader bracket races a pro-comp rail car and he can actually trap a higher mph if he spins a little off the line.
 
I

IntenseBlue

Member
Jul 10, 2005
946
0
16
Jan 7, 2006
#7
  • Jan 7, 2006
  • #7
The MPH on those seem way off.
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Jan 7, 2006
#8
  • Jan 7, 2006
  • #8
The mph is because of converter slipage......

The motor will "spin up" faster into its powerband sorta acting like a larger gear.

But thats same reason the mph is high with the auto is why its et sucks.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jan 8, 2006
#9
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #9
ok i forgot to mention the stick has 3.73's and the auto was running 4.10's. yes the shifts in the auto are very sloshy. ok i know the mph don't add up. the 7.74 was acheved in my mustang at our local air port with no traction availible for my car (i ran the same mph at a 1/4 mile track at 1700ft for my 1/8 but the et was a 7.3). we were both running slicks but like i said i spin. the other car is a 67 dart hard-top with a 360 in it on the same 150 hp shot of juice.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jan 8, 2006
#10
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #10
i would hate to think the 360 is making more hp then me since all that motor has done to it is a cam and intake a 750 edelbrock carb and long tube headers. in which case all my horse dollars (otherwise known as hp) are failing me at the local track.
 

Euphoric306

New Member
Apr 5, 2004
905
0
0
Jan 8, 2006
#11
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #11
IntenseBlue said:
The MPH on those seem way off.
Click to expand...

was thinkin the same thing
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Jan 8, 2006
#12
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #12
You can't compare the way you're trying to with two different cars -- different weight and different aerodynamics. If you're trying to make HP comparisons between two cars based on trap speeds, the cars have to weigh the same and present similar aero profiles.

Bimmertech - I suspect total number of gears in the tranny has little bearing on this as both are probably only using the first 3 gears in the 1/8 mile. However, the ratios of the gears they're using has some bearing -- the 5 speed's first 3 gears are closer together ratio-wise than the auto's are.

Having said all that - since the Dart is likely heavier, is less aerodynamic, is likely losing HP through a slipping tranny-- I'd suspect he's making more HP than you.....just a guess though.

Why does this bother you --- you're beating him to the other end by 1/2 a second in the 1/8th - probably by over a second in the 1/4. What's the problem?
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jan 8, 2006
#13
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #13
the problem is that my 351w has aluminum heads ud pulleys msd ignition coil and distributor etc etc etc his is a stockish 360 with only a cam a intake and long tube headers. he is running the factory heads with no work done to them at all. He just got a set of edelbrock heads for his car and i would hate to thik that this dart is going to make more hp then me. the cars do weigh the same. i wouldn't think the areo on them would be much different my 4 eyed fox is pretty much a box just like his hard top.
 
I

IntenseBlue

Member
Jul 10, 2005
946
0
16
Jan 8, 2006
#14
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #14
Mopars have been known to make more power most of the time. It seems that every time there's an engine comparo between Mopar, GM, and Ford with same class engines, Mopar seems to come out on top. Him having an auto is a big advantage, also.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Jan 8, 2006
#15
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #15
Intense - him having an auto may provide a consistency advantage compared to someone that's not so good at launching or shifting a stick when racing at the strip. But all things equal an auto puts LESS power to the ground than a manual because there's always some slippage due to the torque converter.
 
I

IntenseBlue

Member
Jul 10, 2005
946
0
16
Jan 8, 2006
#16
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #16
I understand how they work. I know we put a C4 and my buddy's Mustang to replace his T5 and it felt alot faster. He had ported X303s with a TFS Stage 3 cam on a 306. Had 3.73s.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jan 8, 2006
#17
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #17
It just sux to go to the after market and get all the good stuff for your own engine and to have your bro-inlaw give a 360 a tremclad rebuid (otherwise known as painting an old engine) and actually make more hp then me.
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Jan 8, 2006
#18
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #18
86bluecobra said:
It just sux to go to the after market and get all the good stuff for your own engine and to have your bro-inlaw give a 360 a tremclad rebuid (otherwise known as painting an old engine) and actually make more hp then me.
Click to expand...

I believe the Mopars have pretty decent factroy heads (big valves).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
560
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
499
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
458
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2025
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?