For those of you with 94 spindles......

[tunedin302]

im not arguing the fox Arms are different than the SN-95s, but they will fit, and its exactly what im looking to accomplish.

......... Just what is it that you are trying to accomplish??

 

[Shakerhood]

im not arguing the fox Arms are different than the SN-95s, but they will fit, and its exactly what im looking to accomplish.

Your wanting the Ricer look? Off Camber in your front wheels, the 94-04s Arms are longer so you are going to push the bottom of the wheel out board, if you have CC plates and are lucky enough to get the front lined up, then your tires are going to be sticking out big time and rub because of the increased track width, I dont know why you are looking to accomplish that.

 

[Kumm3]

Yes, you nailed it, im going for the ricer look.

You found me out.

 

[tunedin302]

Yes, you nailed it, im going for the ricer look.

You found me out.

Sounds like a plan ......

 

[blk9450]

i used a whole 94 k member and a-arms, spindles in my 88 coupe. worked great. wheels did stick out further than a stock fox now that i think about it

 

[Shakerhood]

i used a whole 94 k member and a-arms, spindles in my 88 coupe. worked great. wheels did stick out further than a stock fox now that i think about it

The Stock front track on a Fox is 56.6 inches, not sure what the front track width would be on the SN95, I am sure it would be a bit wider!

 

[FAST4ORD]

Seemed to get off topic here, i would like to know what struts to use on a fox with sn95 spindles, got 2 different answers. Thanks.

 

[Mavrick]

You'll want to use fox struts, especially on a lowered car. You can probably get away with SN95 struts but you may have bottoming out issues if your car is lowered, as the SN95 struts are longer than fox struts.

 

[Shakerhood]

I used the Bullitt set up on my car, so the front is lowered about 7/8" and doesnt come close to bottoming out.