• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

For those who did a T5 swap

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1967coupe
  • Start date Start date Jul 29, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

1967coupe

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
109
0
0
Wausau, WI
Jul 29, 2004
#1
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #1
I'm looking to get a T5. Was just wondering what bell housing people have used (existing vs. T5). It seems like useing the T5 housing is easier, stronger, but it's 1" deeper. I read that the adapter plates aren't very strong and harder to install. I would like to avoid having the driveshaft shortened if at all possible. Your thoughts?
 

one2gamble

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
902
1
0
Monterey
Jul 29, 2004
#2
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #2
I went with a cable clutch/t5 housing. I did cut the driveshaft down but it was less than 100 bucks with new u-joints all around.
 
S

STSFCTN67

Member
Feb 5, 2003
450
0
16
Denver, CO
Jul 29, 2004
#3
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #3
Go with the late model bellhousing, it is much easier to match everything up and you will have the advantage of using all the high performance late model clutch kits. It is actually a good thing to get the driveshaft shortened because they were able to true and balance it. Some people choose not to shorten the driveshaft but the clearance is so close and it is not worth ruining a tranny.
 

347Fastback

Member
Nov 30, 2003
340
0
17
Central Coast
Jul 29, 2004
#4
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #4
I did the t-5 swap with the mustang steve setup. I used late model bellhousing etc and I bought a aluminum driveshaft so everything would live in harmony.... Do yourself a favor and make sure you balance your driveshaft.
 

latamud

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
791
2
19
Tampa, FL
Jul 30, 2004
#5
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #5
I used Mustang Steve's cable setup and it is great. But, my cable is melting on the headers so next time I'm using a hydraulic setup. the tranny is longer that what the vintage cars are used to, so you have to shorten the drive shaft. The bellhousing issue will be answered by whichever type of clutching mechanism you choose to use. The vintage bell uses a z-bar pushing clutch actuator, while the later use a cable pull type. There are adapters to swap between both too. I am even in the process of a T-5 swap in my 65 Cuda. This swap is so much fun. I finally threw the belt on the paxton today and got some highway miles down with the 5 speed. Do your homework before you jump into the project. Make sure you have everything.
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Jul 30, 2004
#6
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #6
I wen with T-5 housing and a modern driveline cable clutch.
 

SandSprite

Member
Feb 8, 2003
332
0
16
L.A., CA
Jul 30, 2004
#7
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #7
I went with the t5 bell and the z-bar linkage. I would like to ditch it for a hydraulic setup though. Either way (old or late bell), you may have to shorten the drivshaft (I did). There may be a difference in the flywheel sizes too. I had to replace my flywheel and clutch to the 157 tooth / 10.5" late model stuff (I have a roller 302, 50oz though). My old toploader had the 164 tooth / 10" clutch, and would not fit in the late model bell. I wouldn't use an adapter, but that's just me. Seems like a waste of money (NEW flywheel and better clutch was about $320, adapter plate is like ~$200), and using the old bell leaves you with the mechanical z-bar setup as the only option (unless you get creative).
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Jul 30, 2004
#8
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #8
SandSprite said:
I went with the t5 bell and the z-bar linkage. I would like to ditch it for a hydraulic setup though. Either way (old or late bell), you may have to shorten the drivshaft (I did). There may be a difference in the flywheel sizes too. I had to replace my flywheel and clutch to the 157 tooth / 10.5" late model stuff (I have a roller 302, 50oz though). My old toploader had the 164 tooth / 10" clutch, and would not fit in the late model bell. I wouldn't use an adapter, but that's just me. Seems like a waste of money (NEW flywheel and better clutch was about $320, adapter plate is like ~$200), and using the old bell leaves you with the mechanical z-bar setup as the only option (unless you get creative).
Click to expand...


You will almost certainly have to shorten the driveshaft as the transmission is longer. I'm yet to hear of anyone not shortening or replacing theirs!

It really sucked when I got to the end of installing mine...started to put the driveshaft in and...
 

1967coupe

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
109
0
0
Wausau, WI
Jul 30, 2004
#9
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #9
Thanks for the input everyone. Now I have a good idea of what I can expect with this swap. Did you guys just get the driveshaft shortened 1" or did you take measurements and go from there?
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Jul 30, 2004
#10
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #10
1967coupe said:
Thanks for the input everyone. Now I have a good idea of what I can expect with this swap. Did you guys just get the driveshaft shortened 1" or did you take measurements and go from there?
Click to expand...

The usual is 3/4" or there abouts. You should take measurements (will help you if you later decide to spend the money on a nice aluminum or carbon fiber driveshaft.) 1" would probably be a safe length though.
 

67coupestang

Founding Member
May 31, 2002
509
2
19
Jul 31, 2004
#11
  • Jul 31, 2004
  • #11
MEASURE!!! every car is a little different! I have a tremec, but i used a mustang cable bell (79ish). I built my own cable clutch setup, which is kinda cool but definately not worth the effort i had to put in it. Doing it again I would go with Steve's
 

1967coupe

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
109
0
0
Wausau, WI
Aug 1, 2004
#12
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #12
There may be a difference in the flywheel sizes too. I had to replace my flywheel and clutch to the 157 tooth / 10.5" late model stuff (I have a roller 302, 50oz though). My old toploader had the 164 tooth / 10" clutch, and would not fit in the late model bell.
Click to expand...

Did everybody have to do this? Would I have to do this with a 289?
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Aug 1, 2004
#13
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #13
I had to with my '68 coupe with a 289. It's simply a matter of bellhousing size. Your 289w ill have a 28oz imbalance though.
 
V

VictorII

New Member
Jun 19, 2004
148
1
0
Cotati, CA
Aug 2, 2004
#14
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #14
I used a standard bell with an adapter plate and gusseted z-bar for strength. IIRC, I had to slightly modify the bell (took about an hour and was easy). Been over 150,000 miles and it is fine; never had a problem and I have driven somewhat spirited at times. You will have to shorten your driveshaft. Using the old style or new style bell will still place the shifter in the same spot, therefore the tailhousing will be about 1" aft of the stock. I had mine shortend 1" and had a spread spaced front u-joint in the front so the old style shaft could be used. As another poster mentioned, the job will cost about $100.00 including balancing and new U-joints. Also beware of possible exhaust interference; I had to have a new cross over installed because the T5 is taller or deeper (whatever) than the T10 I had in there. On the other hand, I have a custom made system. You will love the overdrive. I also loved the 3.35 1st gear. Mated with the 3.40 Traction Lock, it launches well and yet gets decent gas mileage. Semper Fi!
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Aug 3, 2004
#15
  • Aug 3, 2004
  • #15
I used the 5.0 bell and clutch/PP. Def the way to go if you can.
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Aug 3, 2004
#16
  • Aug 3, 2004
  • #16
VictorII said:
I used a standard bell with an adapter plate and gusseted z-bar for strength. IIRC, I had to slightly modify the bell (took about an hour and was easy). Been over 150,000 miles and it is fine; never had a problem and I have driven somewhat spirited at times. You will have to shorten your driveshaft. Using the old style or new style bell will still place the shifter in the same spot, therefore the tailhousing will be about 1" aft of the stock. I had mine shortend 1" and had a spread spaced front u-joint in the front so the old style shaft could be used. As another poster mentioned, the job will cost about $100.00 including balancing and new U-joints. Also beware of possible exhaust interference; I had to have a new cross over installed because the T5 is taller or deeper (whatever) than the T10 I had in there. On the other hand, I have a custom made system. You will love the overdrive. I also loved the 3.35 1st gear. Mated with the 3.40 Traction Lock, it launches well and yet gets decent gas mileage. Semper Fi!
Click to expand...

I paid $50 to have mine shortened.

OOH-RAH! and Semper Fi to you too sir!
 

1967coupe

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
109
0
0
Wausau, WI
Sep 3, 2004
#17
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #17
OK so I've been takin my time on this project and I have a couple more questions. If the T5 has the same bolt pattern as the original, why do I need to use a T5 block plate? I also read that if I use the T5 block plate I will need to get a starter from an auto, is this true? Otherwise this swap is going pretty smooth. Oh yeah...my original slip yoke slides right onto the T5. Does this mean I can return the one I bought and save myself 80 bucks?
 

88 Fox GT

Active Member
Nov 18, 2002
1,674
0
36
Iowa
Sep 3, 2004
#18
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #18
I am using stock T-5 bellhousing and clutch setup with a Ron Morris Performance clutch cable setup. The whole assembly for the clutch cable is rather expensive at $250, but will be worth it.
 
6

6stang8

New Member
Dec 5, 2003
28
0
0
Sep 4, 2004
#19
  • Sep 4, 2004
  • #19
Something else that you might have to deal with is the bellcrank kickdown lever; but it might only apply if you are using a Lakewood T5 bellhousing like I used, I'm not sure.

Anyway on my '68, I didn't have a manual bellcrank, and I didn't want to wait/look for one, so I hacksawed the kickdown lever off of my automatic bellcrank. I think in '69 they went to a seperate kickdown lever from the bellcrank.

Well, to hacksaw the automatic kickdown lever from the bellcrank, I had to remove it from my car. In order to remove it from the car, the gas pedal has to be removed.

Of course I stripped the top of the screw that holds the gas pedal to the bellcrank as it was rusted, so I hacksawed the top of the gas pedal off too! I then used a pair of vise grips to clamp onto the screw to loosen it. I might could have gotten the screw loose by just using the vise grips in the first place; but I didn't think of it. Hindsight is 20/20, oh well....

Also, I'd measure the inside and outside dimensions of your slip yoke. On my C4 slip yoke, the inside was deeper than the outside by 1/2" maybe? I can't remember what it was exactly. I'm thinking 7 3/16" inside and 6 11/16" or 6 13/16" outside? Anyone know for sure?

All I know is that it is deeper. So take that into consideration when you are checking to see if you'll need your driveshaft shortened.
 

MrBobMarley

Founding Member
Oct 7, 2002
460
0
16
Ft Myers, FL
Sep 5, 2004
#20
  • Sep 5, 2004
  • #20
In your first post, you said you'd like to avoid having the d/s shortened. I was the same way, because I heard from many that I could reuse my old d/s and it would fit. As it turned out the easiest and most frustrating part of the entire swap was having a d/s made up for me. When I took the d/s to the shop, the guy couldn't find any u joint to fit the yoke, which I thought was absurd because this is the most common classic car on earth. Well, some clown years ago must have used some kind of yoke from a tractor/firetruck or something because as far as the guy knew, mustangs used 1" cups all around, The yoke that came off my stang required 1 1/8" cups and 1" cups?!?!? So he offered to throw it away and make me an entirely new d/s and that's how I got mine, for 180 bucks. Not too bad.

Btw, its a 65 coupe, 289, 91 gt t5, t5 bellhousing, mustang steve kit, swapped out the auto for t5.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
323
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
586
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
724
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
A
Fox Planning on building my foxbody and was wondering if I can get any tips or anything to watch out for!
  • Angelq1028
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 29, 2025
Robman8028
R
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?