• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

For those who didn't like my LSx in a classic thread...

  • Thread starter Thread starter mtbdoc
  • Start date Start date Apr 14, 2006
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

mtbdoc

New Member
Nov 2, 2003
245
1
0
Apr 14, 2006
#1
  • Apr 14, 2006
  • #1
Then try THIS on for size!

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Cust...4630755744QQcategoryZ6236QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

I think this is a sign of the coming apocalypse
 

LUCAFU1

Founding Member
Apr 19, 2001
496
0
16
Tucson
Apr 14, 2006
#2
  • Apr 14, 2006
  • #2
they are stupid, THE FASTEST STREETABLE MUSTANG WE CAN FIND.
they must not be looking hard.
 

67topless

Member
Mar 31, 2006
203
0
16
Raleigh, NC
Apr 14, 2006
#3
  • Apr 14, 2006
  • #3
Things that make you want to go hmmmmmm!
 
M

mikemustang289

Member
Jan 12, 2006
224
0
16
mesa, az
Apr 14, 2006
#4
  • Apr 14, 2006
  • #4
Too much $$$
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Apr 14, 2006
#5
  • Apr 14, 2006
  • #5
They can not even spell Nickens! It is not about which is better. They are both great. I don't believe anyone NEEDS to mix brands. There are parts to make anything fast these days.
 

65up2d8

Member
Mar 30, 2005
281
0
17
Memphis, TN
Apr 14, 2006
#6
  • Apr 14, 2006
  • #6
Okay, mtbdoc, we get it!!!!! You love Chevy's. There you did it!! You're out of the closet now!! Now, scoot your happy arse over to the LSx forums and annoy them with your insistence on Frankenstangs!!!!!
 

5.0StangRacer

New Member
Sep 16, 2003
227
0
0
Damascus, Maryland
Apr 14, 2006
#7
  • Apr 14, 2006
  • #7
 
M

mustangman1974

Member
Jan 17, 2004
463
0
16
Apr 16, 2006
#8
  • Apr 16, 2006
  • #8
WTF yellow?
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
Apr 16, 2006
#9
  • Apr 16, 2006
  • #9
Convienent that they left out what kind of 427 it is . . .

Still an ugly car, that grille looks like it belongs in dubs
 
M

mtbdoc

New Member
Nov 2, 2003
245
1
0
Apr 17, 2006
#10
  • Apr 17, 2006
  • #10
65up2d8 said:
Okay, mtbdoc, we get it!!!!! You love Chevy's. There you did it!! You're out of the closet now!! Now, scoot your happy arse over to the LSx forums and annoy them with your insistence on Frankenstangs!!!!!
Click to expand...

Nah...bet I've been into Mustangs since before you were born...and have owned more as well! Never had a GM product until the GTO, which is an incredible piece of Australian worksmanship...just happens to be a GM subsidiary, rather than a Ford.

I really did find this funny...someone obviously had way too much $$$ sitting around. Why not a forged 4 valve 5.4 mod w/ a KB blower? I just wish KB had a setup for my goat...

And the folks on LS1Tech.com found that car quite funny...which is where I heard about it and thought I'd share it with you.
 

Penguin

Active Member
Oct 23, 2003
115
1
28
SC
Apr 17, 2006
#11
  • Apr 17, 2006
  • #11
This thread has nothing to do with classics or tech... so why is it here?

You should have posted this in 2005+ talk or not at all.
 

biggyfan1

Member
Mar 10, 2006
186
1
18
High Desert CA
Apr 17, 2006
#12
  • Apr 17, 2006
  • #12
they say WE as if they are ALL. where did "WE" look for the fastes mustang on the street? i think an auto trader.
 

68rustang

Active Member
Jan 17, 2003
1,537
0
36
Cleveland, OH
Apr 17, 2006
#13
  • Apr 17, 2006
  • #13
What is the "I bleed Ford Blue" attitude all about. I see it in one form or another from all camps. What causes people to have such fierce allegiences with a certain make or model? The manufacturers are just business that are out to separate you from your money. Buy, build or modify whatever you like.

A few weekends ago I had a toothless redneck tell me I had to have balls to drive my GMC truck to the "All Ford" swap meet. WTF?

I am with mtbdoc on the lsx motors. They are awesome, hands down the most bang for your buck.

PS - The car in the link is just stupid, for more reasons than just a GM motor in a new mustang.
 

DarkoStoj

Founding Member
Sep 4, 2002
929
13
39
Detroit
Apr 17, 2006
#14
  • Apr 17, 2006
  • #14
i like it.

But I also plan on buying a yellow 06 coupe soon
 
T

TOM B

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 15, 2002
872
1
16
Harrisburg Pa
Apr 17, 2006
#15
  • Apr 17, 2006
  • #15
Hmmm Ford Chevy Battles again,,,, I have 2 mustangs, 65 convert restomod
and a 65 2+2 fastback soon to be restomod and
a 69 corvette in restomod right now. LOVE THEM ALL.
 

kmterrill

kill joy
Jun 10, 2005
2
1
29
Redford, MI
Apr 17, 2006
#16
  • Apr 17, 2006
  • #16
My uncle keeps putting those damn Chubby motors in Fords.... I think he needs to be stopped...
 

65up2d8

Member
Mar 30, 2005
281
0
17
Memphis, TN
Apr 20, 2006
#17
  • Apr 20, 2006
  • #17
mtbdoc said:
Nah...bet I've been into Mustangs since before you were born...and have owned more as well! Never had a GM product until the GTO, which is an incredible piece of Australian worksmanship...just happens to be a GM subsidiary, rather than a Ford.

I really did find this funny...someone obviously had way too much $$$ sitting around. Why not a forged 4 valve 5.4 mod w/ a KB blower? I just wish KB had a setup for my goat...

And the folks on LS1Tech.com found that car quite funny...which is where I heard about it and thought I'd share it with you.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure as to how when I was born or how many Mustangs I've owned is even relevant in any shape, form, or fashion to your post. If it matters, I was born October 27, 1972, and I've only owned one Mustang, which is a 1965 coupe that I've had since I was 15. I've done substantial work to the car, but never dreamed of putting a Chevy engine in it. I don't have to be 50 years old or have owned 15 Mustangs to get the point that you currently prefer LSx engines; you've made that perfectly clear yourself.

With that being said, maybe I came off a little harsh because, IMO, you seem to want to push our collective buttons regarding the LSx engines. If I'm possibly reading you wrong, then please enlighten us, especially me. It seems to me that you don't have much in the way of a budget, so why are you resisting going with a Dart block or the like so much? Are you seriously arguing that a Dart block is not sufficient, or do you really think you can put a LSx engine in significantly cheaper?

I'm really not trying to be an ass here, but it seems to me that you are only trying to create controversy, so don't be surprised when you get it to a certain extent. There is absolutely nothing that an LSx engine will do that a properly set-up Ford based engine won't do, especially in a Ford car. However, if you just want an LSx engine, then go ahead. Its your car; just don't expect the majority of us to applaud your decision.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

O
SOLD FS: 18" FR500 chrome wheels and Toyo tires
  • optionizerSS
  • May 21, 2026
  • Other Classifieds
Replies
1
Views
114
Other Classifieds Jun 2, 2026
optionizerSS
O
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
594
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
Tuners come on inside
  • squeak93
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
259
SVT Tech Forum Feb 20, 2026
squeak93
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
350
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
769
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?