• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Ford Racing supercharger

  • Thread starter Thread starter shanedog
  • Start date Start date Apr 15, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

crash

Founding Member
Aug 12, 1999
337
0
0
Dallas, Tulsa
Apr 22, 2005
#21
  • Apr 22, 2005
  • #21
PolkThug said:
The standard Whipple kit is intercooled also and there is no oil pan tapping.

2005 Mustang Whipple SC
Click to expand...

Right. The Procharger is self contained as well.

Dynos on the Whipple indicate 442 HP, and the Procharger indicate 525 HP.

http://www.procharger.com/2005_mustang.shtml

The Procharger is at least $500 less.
 

ZenGirl35

New Member
Apr 5, 2005
103
0
0
Hotlanta, GA
Apr 22, 2005
#22
  • Apr 22, 2005
  • #22
shanedog: I called my dealership today to make sure my baby was on track for build next week and asked about the Whipple supercharger deal. It may vary from dealer to dealer (and I would sure as hell get something in writing), but the service manager told me they can work it into the price and add to the warranty. What about the Kenne Bell supercharger??
 

ZenGirl35

New Member
Apr 5, 2005
103
0
0
Hotlanta, GA
Apr 22, 2005
#23
  • Apr 22, 2005
  • #23
HP on Roush?

PS - what is the stock HP/RWHP on your Roush Stage 1 (just out of curiosity)?
 

samckernan

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
31
0
0
Seattle
Apr 23, 2005
#24
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #24
shanedog said:
Whats the reason
Click to expand...

Reliability, symplicity, intercooled, and self oiled. Not to mention increased power across the whole RPM range vs only up at the top. And finally, it just looks better in place of the intake manifold vs. hanging off the side.
 
W

Wsmatau

Member
Nov 30, 2004
93
0
6
Apr 23, 2005
#25
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #25
Here is some interesting info I found on KB's site:

http://kennebell.net/techinfo/ford-techinfo/AUTOROTORvsLYSHOLM.pdf

It is a vague comparison on the build quality of KB vs Whipple. From what I gather the KB is built to higher standards for racing purposes. But If I was building a race car I'd definitely go with one of the centrifugal 'chargers. I'm primarily staying on the street, so I'm waiting for both twin screws to come out and see which one offers the best bang for the buck!
 
B

brownbrosperf

New Member
Aug 28, 2004
36
0
0
Vancouver B.C Canada
Apr 23, 2005
#26
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #26
OK, some people need to do more research. PC, KB or Whipple all have self contained oiling systems, PC depends on air to air intercooling KB and Whipple are liquid air. A centrifigal blower like the PC or Vortech will make more "peak" power but less torque, on a street car you will feel more seat of the pants increase with the KB or Whipple as they will make more boost and torque down low. Now if PC is claiming 525rwhp on a stock bottom end they are in bed with rod and piston manufactures, because at the compression ratio the 05 has along with the powdered rods and Hypereutectic pistons, you WILL be breaking parts. The engine has yet to be proven as to what amounts of boost or hp it can handle in stock form, I would think a low to mid 400 rwhp should be ok with a good tune but at 500 plus it is likely a time bomb. I expect the motor to be like the previous 4.6's and be safe at 10psi intercooled which should be good for low to mid 400's to the wheels. Well, this is just my professional opinion, so take it however you would like. O, and to warranty with a blower, has anyone ever read what it says in the FRPP catalog for the Whipple 03/04 Cobra upgrade??? http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts/part_details.asp?PartKeyField=8281
"your engine warranty will be VOID with instalation of this kit."
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

For Sale 2000 GT Conv 4.6 block, heads lots of misc engine parts all removed,degreased, cleaned and inspected.
  • Tods Hot Rods
  • Sep 17, 2024
  • Engine and Power Adder Parts
Replies
3
Views
691
Engine and Power Adder Parts Sep 19, 2024
Tods Hot Rods
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
98 GT PI Swapped Engine Fires, Dies Immediately NOT PATS
  • MMccPerformance
  • Dec 2, 2023
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 20, 2023
Yel2002GTAuto
Y
SOLD [Minnesota] 2014 Ford Mustang GT | Grabber Blue | 6MT Coupe
  • Mycelus
  • Mar 20, 2023
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
1
Views
6K
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Mar 27, 2023
Mycelus
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?