• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Fox Body TB Conversion Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter final5-0
  • Start date Start date Aug 27, 2005

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 27, 2005
#1
  • Aug 27, 2005
  • #1
Everybody who has done it complains about the touchy feel of the go pedal.

Is is that way on the older Stangs as well?

I have driven several Fox Stangs and don't remember their pedal being touchy.

Whats the differences between them?

Later
Grady
 

RIO5.0

15 Year Member
Feb 16, 2001
6,892
8
128
N.H.
Aug 27, 2005
#2
  • Aug 27, 2005
  • #2
If I had to take a guess....

Maybe in the throttle cable being so short....mine had just enuf to get it connected, no extra at all.....the sweep at the firewall was tight...although mine sweeps nice and linear...even when I check the TPS for max volts it was a nice clean sweep...

Maybe the 95 pedal set-up is different and positions it lower or higher contributing to the "touch"..

To me its like driving a dirt bike with a quarter throttle set-up.....takes some getting used to..
 
D

DavidNC

Founding Member
Sep 16, 2002
119
0
16
Aug 27, 2005
#3
  • Aug 27, 2005
  • #3
I want to put a 65mm TB on my 95. Can the explorer TB be installed?
 
M

Mac-man

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
300
0
0
south texas
Aug 27, 2005
#4
  • Aug 27, 2005
  • #4
yes the explorer throttle body can be used but there will be a few modifications needing to be done to make it work.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Aug 27, 2005
#5
  • Aug 27, 2005
  • #5
Complain? I dont see why. It just feels like more throttle response is there. I think its the way it opens the TB up in comparison to the 94-95 style.

Its similar to before when i put this nylon spacer where the pedal connects to throttle cable to lift the pedal up even with the brake pedal. This was on the stock TB setup and it made it "feel" different. All its doing i think is opening up the TB faster maybe.
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
Massachusetts
Aug 27, 2005
#6
  • Aug 27, 2005
  • #6
its really no big deal at all. It will take a couple quick rides to get used to, then u wont even notice it.
 

RIO5.0

15 Year Member
Feb 16, 2001
6,892
8
128
N.H.
Aug 28, 2005
#7
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #7
DavidNC said:
I want to put a 65mm TB on my 95. Can the explorer TB be installed?
Click to expand...

The Ex TB needs to have the ball that the cable connects to moved 180 deg...
notice where the ball is for the cable to connect....


This is a Fox TB....balls on the other side...this is correct..
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
Aug 28, 2005
#8
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #8
Like Jesse said, it will take a drive or two to get used to. But if anything it makes the car feel faster. It just has way better throttle responce. Oh and Grady, I put that 75mm Race TB on and it feels wicked! The car pulls alot harder above 3k rpms, but it is identical to the 75mm below 3k rpms.

Jake
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Aug 28, 2005
#9
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #9
GTJake said:
Oh and Grady, I put that 75mm Race TB on and it feels wicked! The car pulls alot harder above 3k rpms, but it is identical to the 75mm below 3k rpms.

Jake
Click to expand...


Lies!!! I know you lost ALL your low end torque
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 28, 2005
#10
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #10
Grn92LX said:
Lies!!! I know you lost ALL your low end torque
Click to expand...

Mike

You gotta know we are not gonna listen to anything you say anymore cause we are all green with envy over your bad boy stroker

btw ...... Whats the latest with that new combo?

Later
Grady
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Aug 28, 2005
#11
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #11
final5-0 said:
Mike

You gotta know we are not gonna listen to anything you say anymore cause we are all green with envy over your bad boy stroker

btw ...... Whats the latest with that new combo?

Later
Grady
Click to expand...


My bad boy 347 is doing very well. I had a part throttle and meduim load lean issue I had to tune out earlier in the week. I could just feel the car not pulling with a slow/steady 1/2 throttle burst letting the rpm's pull slow and steady (not an all out WOT blast) I looked at my wideband and saw 17:1 and I heard lean pops from the intake. I pulled over and added fuel in the low load and medium load section through the pms and it was better. Thats the joy of a tuning device unlike a chip where you're stuck. It may still need a tad bit of tuning in that area, but its way better than 17:1. WOT is pretty much near ideal and dialed in.

I already wanna pull the heads for porting and do a new cam I need times on this combo though. I also need some 4.10's.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 28, 2005
#12
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #12
Grn92LX said:
My bad boy 347 is doing very well. I had a part throttle and meduim load lean issue I had to tune out earlier in the week. I could just feel the car not pulling with a slow/steady 1/2 throttle burst letting the rpm's pull slow and steady (not an all out WOT blast) I looked at my wideband and saw 17:1 and I heard lean pops from the intake. I pulled over and added fuel in the low load and medium load section through the pms and it was better. Thats the joy of a tuning device unlike a chip where you're stuck. It may still need a tad bit of tuning in that area, but its way better than 17:1. WOT is pretty much near ideal and dialed in.

I already wanna pull the heads for porting and do a new cam I need times on this combo though. I also need some 4.10's.
Click to expand...

Thats great to see Mike.

Looks like you are taking the time and effort to dial that new combo in like things need to be.

Looking forward to some dyno pulls or strip times when you think things are all set and good to go to push it to the limit.

Later
Grady
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Brakes 1966 Mustang convertible 289, Auto - Disc brake conversion issues
  • DRGunn427
  • Feb 26, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
533
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Mar 13, 2025
dmzenge
D
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
582
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
K
TKX Transmission Shifting Problem
  • KWC156
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
2K
Other Auto Tech Saturday at 3:39 PM
427nostang
4
S
CFI to carb conversion question
  • StockerStang
  • Mar 23, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
496
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 11, 2025
AeroCoupe
J
Fox body - godzilla, coyote, or 408w stroker - Best route for budget build?
  • jaygee15
  • Jan 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 30, 2025
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?