• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Front suspension options for 67

  • Thread starter Thread starter BarnStang
  • Start date Start date Oct 16, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

BarnStang

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2001
1,260
3
39
Hagerstown, MD
Oct 16, 2007
#1
  • Oct 16, 2007
  • #1
Started looking at this Ron Morris kit:
http://www.ronmorrisperformance.com/01hot_new/index.html

I like this because I can keep the stock spindles. Already bought the whole disckbrakeswap.com kit from Dennis.

I haven't been able to find anything simular, but wanted to see if I missed something. Don't want to go to a Mustang II or anthing overly exotic.

Has anyone had a chance to try out this set up yet? And are there any other set ups I should look at. Thanks!
 
5

5.0ina66

Member
Jun 6, 2003
664
0
16
Ohio
Oct 16, 2007
#2
  • Oct 16, 2007
  • #2
Everything I've heard is great and it looks REALLY solid. Supposedly it's very adjustable and the one guy I've talked to who has driven the poop out of his car says it improves high speed stability and makes it HANDLE. From an engineering standpoint, it's probably the best out there.

I'm too poor and frugal so I kept the stock setup and modified the shart out of it.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Oct 17, 2007
#3
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #3
If you want to keep the stock style suspension then the Opentracker stuff is a great way to go.
 

jcp123

New Member
Nov 1, 2003
408
0
0
Tyler, TX
Oct 17, 2007
#4
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #4
I don't know about now, but Total Control Products (http://www.totalcontrolproducts.com/) used to have some of the hottest setups around.
 

CochinoFilipino

Founding Member
Jan 14, 2002
171
2
19
CA
Oct 17, 2007
#5
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #5
BarnStang said:
I haven't been able to find anything simular, but wanted to see if I missed something. Don't want to go to a Mustang II or anthing overly exotic.
Click to expand...

The Global West Kit is similiar. http://www.globalwest.net/Mustang 1967-70 coilover suspension kits.htm
 

BarnStang

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2001
1,260
3
39
Hagerstown, MD
Oct 17, 2007
#6
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #6
I had forgotten about Global West. Wow. They are as expensive as TCP. I know, good stuff. Everone raves about the TCP stuff. Need to be a little conservative with this car. Shop project car. I read that the Ron Morris coil overs can be used with stock A arms. Might try that. Still $850.00
 

CochinoFilipino

Founding Member
Jan 14, 2002
171
2
19
CA
Oct 18, 2007
#7
  • Oct 18, 2007
  • #7
BarnStang said:
I read that the Ron Morris coil overs can be used with stock A arms. Might try that. Still $850.00
Click to expand...

There is another kit for use with the stock arms. That coilover shock assembly looks to be shorter than the other. http://www.ronmorrisperformance.com...mp&Product_Code=5160&Category_Code=Susp_Parts

$850 doesn't seem too bad to have adjustable shocks and to be able to dial in ride hieght without having to remove springs and cut coils.
 

CochinoFilipino

Founding Member
Jan 14, 2002
171
2
19
CA
Oct 18, 2007
#8
  • Oct 18, 2007
  • #8
For another $50 you can go with shockwaves and use a shraeder valve. It won't be onboard adjustable but you don't need to spend the dogh on an air management system. http://www.airride.com/productinfo/...ustang+ShockWave&prodID=SKW1022&price=$899.00
 
T

tjnavyblue

Member
Feb 21, 2007
64
0
7
Oct 18, 2007
#9
  • Oct 18, 2007
  • #9
For $850 I'm surprised more people don't go with this option. It's easy to sink almost that much money into stock stuff - springs, roller spring perches, new shocks, not to mention the lack of adjustability once it's all on there. Is Ron Morris reputable?
 

BarnStang

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2001
1,260
3
39
Hagerstown, MD
Oct 18, 2007
#10
  • Oct 18, 2007
  • #10
After looking around some more, 850 is not too bad. I hadn't considered all the adjustability. We used some Ron Morris stuff on a 68 EFI project and wern't too impressed, but that was a few years ago. I'd like to know if anyone has this shock kit installed with the stock A arms.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Oct 18, 2007
#11
  • Oct 18, 2007
  • #11
don't know of anyone using the RM shock kit but one of the guys on 69stang.com has the CPA kit that is almost identical

http://www.casuspension.com/pages/PRODUCTSPAGE.html
 
R

ron67fb

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2001
1,117
0
36
SF Bay area, CA
Oct 19, 2007
#12
  • Oct 19, 2007
  • #12
The Morris kit is a pair of QA1 coilovers and custom plates. The coilovers run about $150 without springs, and the springs go from $40 to $80 each. Figure $500 total for coilovers w/spring, and you're paying $350 for some metal plates. I thought about doing this over a decade ago but I didn't see the point. What's the advantage, besides being able to change ride height, which is not as fast and easy as you think. Being able to dial in your valving? When was the last time you wanted to do that? This kit makes it easy, but is it really worth $850?
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Oct 19, 2007
#13
  • Oct 19, 2007
  • #13
i guess it's up to the individual to decide if it's worth it. i think it's a cool idea myself, if it was cheaper i'd jump all over it. honestly though i've seen what these kits start out as for the original intended application and they are still about $800. the springs were original designed for a gm application, actually
 
T

tjnavyblue

Member
Feb 21, 2007
64
0
7
Oct 20, 2007
#14
  • Oct 20, 2007
  • #14
ron67fb said:
Figure $500 total for coilovers w/spring, and you're paying $350 for some metal plates.
Click to expand...


Good point. I wonder if you sourced your own QA1 coil overs, if Ron Morris would sell you just the plates (presumably for less than $350). For that matter you could just fab up your own plates and have coilovers for $450 - $500 bucks.

Would these coilovers on stock A arms perform better than say, 620 springs with a Edelbrock IAS shock? Or is it a draw, and adjustability is the main difference?
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Oct 20, 2007
#15
  • Oct 20, 2007
  • #15
tjnavyblue said:
Good point. I wonder if you sourced your own QA1 coil overs, if Ron Morris would sell you just the plates (presumably for less than $350). For that matter you could just fab up your own plates and have coilovers for $450 - $500 bucks.

Would these coilovers on stock A arms perform better than say, 620 springs with a Edelbrock IAS shock? Or is it a draw, and adjustability is the main difference?
Click to expand...



probably about the same but you do have some adjustability in the rebound/compression of the shock so you could feasibly make them work better to your tastes. i've heard varying opinions on the IAS shocks but if you were to use them with some of Opentrackers roller perches or his new doule roller perches and a nice set of springs you might get a better ride and handling with them. i have a set of the regular roller perches on my car with 750lb coils and KYB gas-adjust shocks along with a 1" front swaybar and it's not harsh at all, it's firm because of the springs and shocks but the roller perches made a huge difference in the ride from without the roller perches. in fact it feels about the same as when i had the stock small swaybar and plain old monroe matic shocks and stock perches but the front suspension now has more freedom of movement in addition to being stiffer.
 
B

Blue Oval Man

Member
Aug 8, 2004
125
0
16
Shaunavon, Saskatchewan
Oct 20, 2007
#16
  • Oct 20, 2007
  • #16
I think the biggest benefit to the Ron Morris kit is the ease of adjusting the shocks.
In my case on one weekend I may be drag racing and the next going to an autocross. Because of where I live I drive anywhere from one to five hours on rough Saskatchewan and Alberta highways to get to these events. As you can see, shock adjusting is something I do quite often.
With a typical spring, perch, shock setup it is extremely hard to get at the adjusters on an adjustable shock but the Ron Morris kit would really make this a much easier chore. Being able to adjust ride height is just an added bonus.
David
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Oct 20, 2007
#17
  • Oct 20, 2007
  • #17
Blue Oval Man said:
I think the biggest benefit to the Ron Morris kit is the ease of adjusting the shocks.
In my case on one weekend I may be drag racing and the next going to an autocross. Because of where I live I drive anywhere from one to five hours on rough Saskatchewan and Alberta highways to get to these events. As you can see, shock adjusting is something I do quite often.
With a typical spring, perch, shock setup it is extremely hard to get at the adjusters on an adjustable shock but the Ron Morris kit would really make this a much easier chore. Being able to adjust ride height is just an added bonus.
David
Click to expand...



well then this sounds like the kit for you.
 

69gmachine

Member
Dec 2, 2004
576
2
19
Southern Maryland
Oct 23, 2007
#18
  • Oct 23, 2007
  • #18
BarnStang said:
I had forgotten about Global West. Wow. They are as expensive as TCP. I know, good stuff. Everone raves about the TCP stuff. Need to be a little conservative with this car. Shop project car. I read that the Ron Morris coil overs can be used with stock A arms. Might try that. Still $850.00
Click to expand...

The link you posted to the RM website says $2495, which is much more reasonable for a coilover kit that mounts to the LCA. I didn't see anything for $850, but I assume you're referencing the kit that mounts in place of the stock shock & spring. I would think it would improve it about the same as the Open Tracker kit, eliminating the binding but that's about all, and $850 is a lot to pay just for that.

The RM design in the link is almost a carbon copy of mine, although I certainly wouldn't claim he stole it from me as we both just used what is readily available design wise to the circle track crowd. (My invoice for them is dated Oct 26, 2004 btw)


I'm using AFCO double adjustable shocks that run $375 a piece. I believe you get what you pay for (99% of the time anyway) and the AFCO shock is just a plain better shock than the QA-1 IMO. From my experience, the folks at AFCO are much easier to deal with if there's a problem also.

The light weight of my design (and presumably the full blown RM coilover kit as well) makes it more responsive than the TCP or GW designs. I weighed a TCP lower arm w/BJ and it came in at 6.8 lb. An older style GW upper w/BJ and spring perch came in at a whopping 12.0 lbs! My upper and lower combined weigh less than that. My upper arm weighs 4.4 w/BJ and the lower is just 4.6 w/BJ.

If budget is the driving factor, I'd just use the Open Tracker stuff. If you can afford the RM ($2495) coilover kit however, I'd say it's worth every penny. I wouldn't consider the TCP or GW coilover kits at any price as they are way too heavy.
 

BarnStang

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2001
1,260
3
39
Hagerstown, MD
Oct 23, 2007
#19
  • Oct 23, 2007
  • #19
69gmachine, yes, the RM coilover kit by itself that mounts to the stock A arm is $850. I know we want to do something to make an improvement, but I don't think we can streach to $2500 for this car. You refer to your design being lighte than the TCP or GW kits. Do you sell a kit yourself or is there some more info you can provide? I'm going to look over the Afco stuff. Thanks!
 
6

68EFIvert

Member
Jan 13, 2007
639
0
17
Camas, Washington
Oct 23, 2007
#20
  • Oct 23, 2007
  • #20
I am running the RM kit on my 68. It is very easy to adjust and works great. I actually purchased mine brand new on ebay. He said there was defects in the finish but I couldn't find any. I paid just over $1800 including shipping. Watch out for it there and you may be glad you did. I knew I wanted coil overs and when that deal came up I couldn't resist. I would pay the full retail price for them. I think RM runs ads in some of the mustang publications for $2295.

One major benefit of the design is the coils are only 450 lb. This is achieved by moving the spring mounting point closer to the spindle. You will have a much better ride quality than 620 lb coils and the geometry is improved over stock. All of this results in better handling.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
S
65 Coupe I6 Auto to 302 EFI 5 Speed Swap
  • Scuderia
  • Feb 3, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 9, 2025
Noobz347
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
648
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
New daily driver help needed.....not a mustang but mustang drivetrain.
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Jun 17, 2024
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
80
Views
6K
Other Auto Tech Jul 28, 2024
manicmechanic007
R
Progress Thread Shelby's Mustang - project revived after 7 years...
  • racer_dave
  • Jul 31, 2023
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
13
Views
3K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 3, 2025
racer_dave
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?