• Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech

Fuel injection for V6?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Putter
  • Start date Start date Sep 12, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

78CobraII

Moderator
Jul 31, 1998
1,808
8
39
Birmingham, AL
Oct 27, 2005
#21
  • Oct 27, 2005
  • #21
I would take a bunch of measurements before purchasing the engine...mainly the bell housing bolt locations and the engine mount locations.

But I would also measure the overall height of the engine. A351MUST2 knows a guy that built an early Capri with the 4.0L SOHC and it had some of the intake coming through the hood. It would be useful to know what transmission he used also.

Here are a couple of articles on putting a 2.8L V6 and T-5 in a Sunbeam Alpine: http://www.team.net/www/rootes/sunbeam/alpine/mk1-5/techtips/alpv6idx.html . They advise the use of a hydraulic throw-out bearing to simplify clutch linkage issues. The 1st article is pretty uncomplementary of the MII, but we know he's full of sh!@t.

Keep us up to date on your progress!
 

Putter

New Member
Dec 5, 2002
147
0
0
Calgary
Oct 27, 2005
#22
  • Oct 27, 2005
  • #22
"I've heard that the OHC 4.0 has a bit more in the grunt department....."

Yup 210 HP


I may just buy it anyway as it is a complete set up with all harnesses and computer. If it won't fit I have other cars for it.
I will keep you guys advised as I go.

I am curious if it the same block as it will make the engine mounting easier.
The height is also a big problem it's out of a truck frame amd if the intake on a 2.9 truck is any indication. it won't fit.
 
M

mustangmods

Member
Oct 25, 2005
49
1
8
Oct 28, 2005
#23
  • Oct 28, 2005
  • #23
Aren't most of the newer v6 engines rear sump. How would you clear the crossmembers? The 3.8L supercoup has a rear pickup tube but has an external oil pump mounted on the front cover. Is there some front sump pans out there that fit 3.8 and 4.2?
 

Putter

New Member
Dec 5, 2002
147
0
0
Calgary
Oct 28, 2005
#24
  • Oct 28, 2005
  • #24
The 4.0 SOHC is based on the same Cologne V6 as the 2.8 as far as I know. Therefore I am hoping that the pick-up and oil pans are the same.
I'll let you know.
 

78CobraII

Moderator
Jul 31, 1998
1,808
8
39
Birmingham, AL
Oct 28, 2005
#25
  • Oct 28, 2005
  • #25
I would think that a rear sump oil pan might be an advantage. At least you don't have to worry about oil pan interference with the steering rack. You might have to modify the brace for the control arms, but there should be plenty of space behind the suspension crossmember otherwise.



On the 4.0L intake manifold height...if it doesn't have a dual runner per intake design (i.e. one short for high rpm, one long for low rpm with a butterfly valve to switch), then you should be able to make a new lower intake with aluminum tubing. You just need to know someone with a tubing cutter and TIG welder.

If you look at the aluminum 3.0L SVO intake, you can see that each runner is aluminum tube connected to the port plate on one end and the plenum on the other with a silicone boot. It all fits very close to the valve covers.

The attached pics show the SVO 3.0L V6 install in an Austin Healey here: http://members.cox.net/rdgrauman/Healey.html
 

Attachments

  • SVT3.0-Intake_mods1-sm.webp
    46.1 KB · Views: 186
  • SVT3.0-Intake_AustinHealey-sm.webp
    30.5 KB · Views: 195

Putter

New Member
Dec 5, 2002
147
0
0
Calgary
Oct 28, 2005
#26
  • Oct 28, 2005
  • #26
Nice pictures, thanks. I am getting a good feeling after those When I looked at a Ranger truck 2.8 intake I knew there was no way. but this might just work.
 

jeffnoel

Founding Member
Aug 31, 2002
1,638
5
37
Clovis, CA
Oct 28, 2005
#27
  • Oct 28, 2005
  • #27
A SHO in a II would be very cool.
 

78CobraII

Moderator
Jul 31, 1998
1,808
8
39
Birmingham, AL
Dec 12, 2005
#28
  • Dec 12, 2005
  • #28
A bit more 2.8L/4.0L info...

The "Cologne" V6 entry from Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Cologne_engine

And the complete list of Ford engines from Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ford_engines

An engine rebuilding article on the 4.0L:
http://www.babcox.com/editorial/ar/ar40123.htm

This last is from "Engine Builder" magazine, which should probably be called 'Engine Re-Builder":
http://www.engine-builder.com/index.htm

They seem to have some good tips on interchangability of parts though...
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Fuel injection questions
  • limp
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
337
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 28, 2025
limp
G
Gen3 Coyote Motor Swap into 2014 GT
  • GTman14
  • Apr 2, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
542
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2025
Noobz347
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
667
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
M
01 mustang 3.8 fuel pressure issue
  • Mhaley2006
  • May 29, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
102
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 29, 2026
Mhaley2006
M
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
782
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?