• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

Fuel Tank Issue

  • Thread starter Thread starter jfrayzier
  • Start date Start date Feb 2, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
J

jfrayzier

New Member
May 20, 2005
21
0
0
Feb 13, 2007
#41
  • Feb 13, 2007
  • #41
Jenns05Stang said:
Alright Fellas,

I viewed the complaints issued so far and there is one thing that I noticed. If I was the NHTSA complaint reviewer, I would not escalate this issue as a SAFETY concern. For those who fill in the form from here forward please ensure you indicate if the fuel has backed out of the inlet tube over the side of the vehicle.
Click to expand...

My complaint with both the EPA and the NHTSA indicated that the fuel does spew back out of the tank and onto the ground/person fueling the vehicle.
 
S

Spdfreak

New Member
Feb 21, 2006
276
1
0
Feb 13, 2007
#42
  • Feb 13, 2007
  • #42
I just don't get this problem. It has done it twice at the Exxon I usually go to. It's never done it at BP or Texaco. (Of course, the latter two are about 10 cents higher)
 

Marine One

New Member
Jan 28, 2004
276
1
0
North Topsail Beach, NC
Feb 13, 2007
#43
  • Feb 13, 2007
  • #43
Spdfreak said:
I just don't get this problem. It has done it twice at the Exxon I usually go to. It's never done it at BP or Texaco. (Of course, the latter two are about 10 cents higher)
Click to expand...

Here, in my humble opinion is the issue: We should be able to go anywhere and get gas. We shouldn't have to pick and choose our fueling stations based on whether or not our finicky cars think they are ok.
I've owned a lot of cars in my life and have never ever endured this until now...
 
J

jfrayzier

New Member
May 20, 2005
21
0
0
Feb 14, 2007
#44
  • Feb 14, 2007
  • #44
Marine One said:
Here, in my humble opinion is the issue: We should be able to go anywhere and get gas. We shouldn't have to pick and choose our fueling stations based on whether or not our finicky cars think they are ok.
I've owned a lot of cars in my life and have never ever endured this until now...
Click to expand...

I agree. Unfortunately when I said that to Ford, they didn't agree.
 
S

Spdfreak

New Member
Feb 21, 2006
276
1
0
Feb 14, 2007
#45
  • Feb 14, 2007
  • #45
It seems as though there may be a problem with the filler neck, as if the gas gets caught up in the neck and triggers the shut-off. Perhaps Ford can't design a better one for whatever reason.

All I know is that's it's a pain in the butt when it's 22 degrees with 15mph winds.
 
J

jfrayzier

New Member
May 20, 2005
21
0
0
Feb 14, 2007
#46
  • Feb 14, 2007
  • #46
Spdfreak said:
All I know is that's it's a pain in the butt when it's 22 degrees with 15mph winds.
Click to expand...

That's exactly what I was thinking last time it happened to me.

For what it's worth, the dealership called today conducting a short survey to find out if I was please with the service I received when my car was in the shop...
 

07 GT/CS

New Member
Feb 9, 2007
33
0
0
NorCal
Feb 15, 2007
#47
  • Feb 15, 2007
  • #47
Somebody needs to get the media in on this one. Perhaps somebody with a touch at a TV station. One of those consumer advocate type guys to do a video on it. Then a bunch of calls to a national network alerting them to the local shoot to get it going nationwide. I have an 07 GT/CS on order due to arrive any day. When it gets here, and if mine does this, there will be hell to pay. It will receive much attention. But it would be nice to get the ball rolling now. Nothing like a nice clear video showing gas shooting out of the tank all over somebody on national TV to get Ford's attention.
 
S

Spdfreak

New Member
Feb 21, 2006
276
1
0
Feb 16, 2007
#48
  • Feb 16, 2007
  • #48
07 GT/CS said:
Somebody needs to get the media in on this one. Perhaps somebody with a touch at a TV station. One of those consumer advocate type guys to do a video on it. Then a bunch of calls to a national network alerting them to the local shoot to get it going nationwide. I have an 07 GT/CS on order due to arrive any day. When it gets here, and if mine does this, there will be hell to pay. It will receive much attention. But it would be nice to get the ball rolling now. Nothing like a nice clear video showing gas shooting out of the tank all over somebody on national TV to get Ford's attention.
Click to expand...
If only.
I am the executive news producer at a network affiliate. As such, I can tell you that you will be hard pressed to find a local affiliate willing to do this story, and here's why...

1.) Auto dealership advertising is the vast majority of a station's income. Think about it. How many car dealer ads do you see everyday?

2.) The legal issue. You have to have your station's legal department go through the whole story with a fine-tooth comb.

3.) Lastly, it's not a safety issue. If the car could blow up, or injure someone, (think firestone and ford pinto) then it's a big story. This does not qualify.

Still, it ticks me off.

Edit: Let me clarify point 1. You do the story, it makes your local Ford dealers look bad, and they drop advertising from your station, costing you a ton of money.
 

celticstanger

Member
Dec 21, 2004
179
0
16
"Glen Ivy", CA
Feb 16, 2007
#49
  • Feb 16, 2007
  • #49
Hmmm. did anyone see the story on the Volvo safety issues, this week? I kept seeing the "Coming up, after the break...", but never saw the story. I cannot speak for your particular station, but it doesn't appear that the terror of losing advertising revenue prevents all stations from airing news.

Also, I agree, the slow fill is not a safety issue, but gasoline splashing back certainly is. I don't know how common that particular issue is, though (of the few times my replaced tank has acted up, only about 1 in 20 do I get gas all over my leg/car/gas-station forecourt).

It's a shame that even relatively small, local businesses appear to be able to "buy" the news, even though I understand the need for the income.
 
S

Spdfreak

New Member
Feb 21, 2006
276
1
0
Feb 16, 2007
#50
  • Feb 16, 2007
  • #50
celticstanger,

It's the nature of the beast. What station did you see the Volvo story on? Was it it a local station? Usually only networks have the massive legal firms to protect them. This is the type of story the locals just won't do.

For example, in this market, just one Ford dealer pays us over a million dollars a year for advertising. The "powers that be" will not risk losing that kind of money.

The nets can take the risk because the automakers know how much they need the nets' advertising.

Even the nets are leary about these stories. Remember the Dateline story on GMC pickups catching fire? Seems the news crew rigged the truck with incendiary devices to get the proper effect. They (NBC) paid tens of millions to make that lawsuit go away.

This won't hit air until someone gets seriously hurt, or worse.

It's very unfortunate
 

celticstanger

Member
Dec 21, 2004
179
0
16
"Glen Ivy", CA
Feb 16, 2007
#51
  • Feb 16, 2007
  • #51
Spdfreak said:
celticstanger,

It's the nature of the beast. What station did you see the Volvo story on? Was it it a local station? Usually only networks have the massive legal firms to protect them. This is the type of story the locals just won't do.

For example, in this market, just one Ford dealer pays us over a million dollars a year for advertising. The "powers that be" will not risk losing that kind of money.

The nets can take the risk because the automakers know how much they need the nets' advertising.

Even the nets are leary about these stories. Remember the Dateline story on GMC pickups catching fire? Seems the news crew rigged the truck with incendiary devices to get the proper effect. They (NBC) paid tens of millions to make that lawsuit go away.

This won't hit air until someone gets seriously hurt, or worse.

It's very unfortunate
Click to expand...


It could've been one of the networks, now you mention it. I think it was Thursday, as I was throwing my crap into my bags in my hotel room in SF, so I wasn't paying too much attention - tv was on for some company (yes, I'm one sad individual - when I'm away at work for the week, anyway ).
 

txwolfy

New Member
Oct 11, 2004
55
0
0
90 miles north of London, England
Feb 20, 2007
#52
  • Feb 20, 2007
  • #52
I am in the same boat, but in England! Had a 2005 GT, bad tank, Ford replaced it and problem went away. Sold it, have my 2006, almost exactly same car (OK, went for the bigger wheels and leather this time), but same fuel problem. Now Ford says - sorry. Went through Military Car Sales Customer Service in Germany and they said - sorry. So went straight to Ford, and they said - go through Military Car Sales in Germany. Hmmmmmm.
Can't go to different gas stations - on base is where gas is bought. Except with coupons we can buy, but when you can only use half the coupon, you lose the balance of fuel, no refunds when you can't fill the tank.
Retired military, working for the Air Force in Europe has it's advantages, but dealing with Ford is a lot tougher!
 

Art161

Member
Sep 26, 2006
130
0
16
San Francisco
Feb 21, 2007
#53
  • Feb 21, 2007
  • #53
My problems with refueling have been relatively minor--so far. Why don't those of you who have had significant problems write letters to Consumer Reports and ask them how they can recommend a car that spews gasoline on the ground and/or on the person refilling the gas tank?
 

Jenns01TA

Active Member
Mar 31, 2005
37
0
36
Feb 27, 2007
#54
  • Feb 27, 2007
  • #54
-Bump-
 

Marine One

New Member
Jan 28, 2004
276
1
0
North Topsail Beach, NC
Feb 27, 2007
#55
  • Feb 27, 2007
  • #55
Art161 said:
My problems with refueling have been relatively minor--so far. Why don't those of you who have had significant problems write letters to Consumer Reports and ask them how they can recommend a car that spews gasoline on the ground and/or on the person refilling the gas tank?
Click to expand...

I don't know how much good writing to a magazine will do. Maybe the consumer products safety commission and/or NHTSA instead?
This whole thing is just wrong.
 

Jenns01TA

Active Member
Mar 31, 2005
37
0
36
Mar 2, 2007
#56
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #56
After some research at the EPA and a little "light" reading of some Federal rulings concerning Passenger vehicle fuel system delivery and acceptance standards, I have a sinking feeling that this issue may go nowhere.

Ford and GMC have obtained enough executive exemption orders for compliance under other vehicle lines that I venture to guess they are going to make this a drawn out issue in which they claim "hardship". The amount of vehicles this is impacting in relation to the overall vehicle class and manufacture numbers for the 2005-2007 years is low. Unfortunately, the statistical impact points to fuel delivery issues at the pump versus inadequate acceptance design on the car.

I still call B.S., but it all boils down to statistics, Gentlemen. If the design of the fuel inlet and tank are within federal standards (which it is) there is little that WILL be done.

We can certainly wait to see if this escalates due to "death or injury claims", but as it looks now the “big dog” has the proverbial federal bone.

Good Luck Fellas. I found a solution to my fuel tank issue. It is a 2001TransAm. No fuel acceptance issues with him.

~Jenn~
 

txwolfy

New Member
Oct 11, 2004
55
0
0
90 miles north of London, England
Mar 14, 2007
#57
  • Mar 14, 2007
  • #57
Driving my 06 GT to France next week, though Normandy and visiting the D Day beaches for 4 days. Hope I don't have the same problem there as I do here in England - I'll let the forum know.
Got my "final" response from Ford the other day - sorry they couldn't be of more assistance. Funny - they were glad to take my $30 grand.
Checking with a New York law firm on possible lemon law suit. Overseas Military Car Sales is in New York, so I hope the NY laws apply -
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Mar 14, 2007
#58
  • Mar 14, 2007
  • #58
since it has warmed up here, i fill it up a little more frequently. it was too cold to be filling it all the time, so i let it get to about a 1/4 tank before i would fill.

now, i have been filling it at 1/2 tank, and have not had any problems getting it to fill.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
01 mustang 3.8 fuel pressure issue
  • Mhaley2006
  • May 29, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
169
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 29, 2026
Mhaley2006
M
H
Fuel starvation issues, 91 EFI to carb swap. Car dying after 1-3 gallons used. EFI tank, electric fuel pump, bypass regulator. Dual fed carb
  • hassler
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
781
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 12, 2025
nickyb
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
922
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
G
1994 v6 gas leak after fuel pump replacement
  • Gav
  • Aug 16, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
955
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 28, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?