• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

G-Force vs TKO 500\600

  • Thread starter Thread starter carbed 85 gt
  • Start date Start date Dec 10, 2005

carbed 85 gt

New Member
Mar 20, 2003
121
0
0
Honolulu HI
Dec 10, 2005
#1
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #1
I need some info on these set ups, let me know how you guys are doing with these. Should I buy the synchronised kit from G-Force and get a rebuild kit for the small stuff or go the TKO route with the special slip yoke and crossmmber. It seems that both trans cost about the same just you get a core charge with the G force.
 
M

Mike92GT

Founding Member
Jan 23, 2002
583
0
0
Florida
Dec 11, 2005
#2
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #2
I did a lot of research on this recently. The G-Force kit is $1195, but in order to get it to handle the 600 ft lbs they advertise, you need to spend $335 on an upgraded mainshaft. Then $150 on a rebuild/small parts kit. If you pay someone to install it it will run around $250. That's over 1900 for just the G-Force trans, which is a couple hundred more then the TKO 600. The TKO will require the bellhousing and yoke, which is about $240. So the units themselves cost roughly the same. But the T5 is basically a rebuilt unit, while the TKO will be brand new and factory assembled. To me the TKO just seemed like a better alternative. I'm sure some will disagree. There are other pros/cons as well. For example, the T5 will be a little lighter then the TKO.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Dec 11, 2005
#3
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #3
That's a tough one. I went through the choice myself. The G-force seems to be proven, so does the TKO. Don't know 100%, but overall I am sure the TKO is a better transmission, that is why I went that rought. If your going to do the T5 G-force, get all the shafts and such, otherwise, do the TKO. I went with the TKO 500 and like it.
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Dec 11, 2005
#4
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #4
Go TKO it is easier and less hassle.
 
P

proxses

Founding Member
Dec 12, 2000
620
0
0
Dayton, Oh
Dec 11, 2005
#5
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #5
If I remember right, the TKO uses a different shifter. So, if you already have an aftermarket shifter, that is another thing to consider.
 

EMW150

Founding Member
May 22, 2000
2,020
1
46
Roaring Spring,PA
Dec 11, 2005
#6
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #6
Strength wise they're pretty much the same with the upgraded G-Force. I know my next trans will be a G-Force with Dog ring setup (when, not if I blow up the Pro-shifted TKO). It's a pretty big weight break pretty far forward on the car compared to the Tremec and also less reciprocating mass.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Dec 11, 2005
#7
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #7
The TKO has a stronger case and that keeps the gears from shifting position inside the case. The stronger case makes for a longer lasting transmission.
 
M

montanagrog

New Member
May 7, 2002
11
0
0
Dec 11, 2005
#8
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #8
A vote here for the GForce. The rating I was quoted was 650ft/lbs of torque in a 3400# car with the upgraded main shaft. We have the upgraded GForce in my son's 89 Gt convertable, and are very pleased with it. This was even with dealer problems. (Go to GForce for the trany!). The shifting is solid and smooth. The case is not the main problem with the T5, it's stock mainshaft is. The GForce solves this with the upgraded shaft and inter re-enforement plate. Also love that .59 overdrive on the hiway with the 3.73s in the GT.

I have heard from a friend whom has the T500, that it shifts more positive than his 500. He's driven ours, but I've yet to drive his. He also had to 'clearance' the tunnel to make room for the 500, new shifter, new output slip yoke, speedo cable didn't fit. When I was researching the tranys, there was alot of posting of problems with the 500/600s. Hopefully these have been resolved as I haven't read many lately.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
459
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Drivetrain G Force T5 installation trouble
  • skiwesser11
  • Aug 29, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 30, 2021
skiwesser11
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sunday at 3:20 PM
GearHeadGuy
C
Progress Thread 2004 Comp Orange GT
  • ctandc
  • Jun 26, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
56
Views
5K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
ctandc
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?