• Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech

Gas Tank Options For A MII

  • Thread starter Thread starter JackH
  • Start date Start date Jan 16, 2024
J

JackH

Active Member
Jan 8, 2024
39
34
28
San Diego, CA
Jan 16, 2024
#1
  • Jan 16, 2024
  • #1
Hey all, still working on the II. The distributor pickup coil should be here later this week and I have also found that the ignition coil was bad so I got a new one put in. Anyway, I was wondering if anyone new if/what gas tanks are interchangeable on a 77-78 mustang because a new OEM one is $250. The ones for a 74-76 MII are $165 on ebay so I was wondering if that would work? To my knowledge the only reason they changed them halfway thru the ii was because of the whole pintos explosion crisis. Also if I did do that, would I need a new filler neck, sending unit? Mine is a 2.8L V6.

Thanks for the advice,
Jack H.
 
Reactions: 2Blue2

85GTStangGuy

5 Year Member
May 19, 2021
1,001
625
133
Jax, Florida
Jan 17, 2024
#2
  • Jan 17, 2024
  • #2
Didn't the earlier MII's have the gas filler lower on the rear quarter, whereas the later ones had the filler higher up? Don't know the by-the-years breakdown, but just wondering if that is the reason for the different tanks. It may have been more than just a change in filler necks....
 
Reactions: Blackhawkxx and JackH

LILCBRA

I wish I didn't have all of these balls in the air
Mod Dude
Dec 6, 2005
6,378
5,363
194
Corn County USA
Jan 17, 2024
#3
  • Jan 17, 2024
  • #3
If I remember correctly there was a slight change to the top of the tank to accommodate for something. I know the early tanks don't fit the later cars though, I tried since the tank in my 77 was full of pinholes on top and I had a 76 parts car that I tried to swap from. From there I think there are only 2 - 3 options. 1st one is probably the most expensive as you've pointed out - find a replacement. A quick Google search revealed one through PartsGeek.com here. Another option is to swap in a fuel cell, but that may be just as expensive and most likely less practical, depending on what you could come up with. The third option is what I did way back when - the Fox cars use a tank with a similar shape but required modifications to the car as well as the tank. I have a thread in the stickies under the tech link: http://www.stangnet.com/mustang-forums/threads/fox-fuel-tank-in-a-ii.820975/

I also have a short YouTube video that I tried to illustrate what all needs done.
That path required welding on the fuel tank. Be careful if you try this on a used tank as I did, but I didn't have any problems. I got my tank from a salvage yard, but there are plenty of options for new. Mine was from a fuel injected car, but I kind of wonder if you were to get one made for an early non-EFI car, say a 79, if the filler tube would work and you wouldn't have to really do much to install the II's pickup. Those can be purchased new from LMR. They have 2 options for non-EFI, the early 79-81 and the 81-86. You could also opt to install the later tanks and just use a Fox pickup and pump in conjunction with a fuel pressure regulator, but IIRC the fuel level sender has different ohms settings as compared to the II so your gauge might not work properly.

I guess there's a 4th option that I know has been done, but that requires even more modifications to the car: cut the floor from the hatch/trunk and install an early Mustang tank. That requires relocating the filler, using a flip down license plate and sealing off the original filler.

85GTStangGuy said:
Didn't the earlier MII's have the gas filler lower on the rear quarter, whereas the later ones had the filler higher up? Don't know the by-the-years breakdown, but just wondering if that is the reason for the different tanks. It may have been more than just a change in filler necks....
Click to expand...

You are correct, the 74s had the filler neck located lower on the quarter than the 75-78 cars, but to my knowledge the tanks are the same from 74-76.
 
Last edited: Jan 17, 2024
Reactions: JackH and 85GTStangGuy

LILCBRA

I wish I didn't have all of these balls in the air
Mod Dude
Dec 6, 2005
6,378
5,363
194
Corn County USA
Jan 17, 2024
#4
  • Jan 17, 2024
  • #4
LILCBRA said:
The third option is what I did way back when - the Fox cars use a tank with a similar shape but required modifications to the car as well as the tank. I have a thread in the stickies under the tech link: http://www.stangnet.com/mustang-forums/threads/fox-fuel-tank-in-a-ii.820975/

I also have a short YouTube video that I tried to illustrate what all needs done.

That path required welding on the fuel tank. Be careful if you try this on a used tank as I did, but I didn't have any problems. I got my tank from a salvage yard, but there are plenty of options for new. Mine was from a fuel injected car, but I kind of wonder if you were to get one made for an early non-EFI car, say a 79, if the filler tube would work and you wouldn't have to really do much to install the II's pickup. Those can be purchased new from LMR. They have 2 options for non-EFI, the early 79-81 and the 81-86. You could also opt to install the later tanks and just use a Fox pickup and pump in conjunction with a fuel pressure regulator, but IIRC the fuel level sender has different ohms settings as compared to the II so your gauge might not work properly.
Click to expand...

Actually, come to think of it, you'd need to weld the pick up location like I did, the Fox tank is installed backward compared to it's construction.
 
Reactions: JackH
J

JackH

Active Member
Jan 8, 2024
39
34
28
San Diego, CA
Jan 18, 2024
#5
  • Jan 18, 2024
  • #5
LILCBRA said:
If I remember correctly there was a slight change to the top of the tank to accommodate for something. I know the early tanks don't fit the later cars though, I tried since the tank in my 77 was full of pinholes on top and I had a 76 parts car that I tried to swap from. From there I think there are only 2 - 3 options. 1st one is probably the most expensive as you've pointed out - find a replacement. A quick Google search revealed one through PartsGeek.com here. Another option is to swap in a fuel cell, but that may be just as expensive and most likely less practical, depending on what you could come up with. The third option is what I did way back when - the Fox cars use a tank with a similar shape but required modifications to the car as well as the tank. I have a thread in the stickies under the tech link: http://www.stangnet.com/mustang-forums/threads/fox-fuel-tank-in-a-ii.820975/

I also have a short YouTube video that I tried to illustrate what all needs done.
That path required welding on the fuel tank. Be careful if you try this on a used tank as I did, but I didn't have any problems. I got my tank from a salvage yard, but there are plenty of options for new. Mine was from a fuel injected car, but I kind of wonder if you were to get one made for an early non-EFI car, say a 79, if the filler tube would work and you wouldn't have to really do much to install the II's pickup. Those can be purchased new from LMR. They have 2 options for non-EFI, the early 79-81 and the 81-86. You could also opt to install the later tanks and just use a Fox pickup and pump in conjunction with a fuel pressure regulator, but IIRC the fuel level sender has different ohms settings as compared to the II so your gauge might not work properly.

I guess there's a 4th option that I know has been done, but that requires even more modifications to the car: cut the floor from the hatch/trunk and install an early Mustang tank. That requires relocating the filler, using a flip down license plate and sealing off the original filler.



You are correct, the 74s had the filler neck located lower on the quarter than the 75-78 cars, but to my knowledge the tanks are the same from 74-76.
Click to expand...
I appreciate the advice and experience! From what I could price out, going with a fuel cell with all of the lines an fittings would require slight cutting and cost about $300-$350. I have no way of knowing if my fuel sending unit works but I CAN see if it is getting voltage I guess...I really don't need a gas gauge anyway because I can't go to far off base before having to go back again lol. It seems replacing the electric fuel pump and going with a OEM tank is best I guess.

Thanks,
Jack H
 
Reactions: 2Blue2

extra_stout

5 Year Member
Aug 27, 2018
821
933
113
Germany
Jan 18, 2024
#6
  • Jan 18, 2024
  • #6
JackH said:
have no way of knowing if my fuel sending unit works but I CAN see if it is getting voltage I guess...
Click to expand...
The fuel sending unit has a variable resistance, which is measured by the fuel gauge. You need to measure the resistance at the wire connector at the fuel tank. The values for full and empty are given in the shop manual.
I cleaned my tank and sending unit and its working. My car was sitting for 20 years with fuel in the tank...
 
Reactions: JackH

LILCBRA

I wish I didn't have all of these balls in the air
Mod Dude
Dec 6, 2005
6,378
5,363
194
Corn County USA
Jan 18, 2024
#7
  • Jan 18, 2024
  • #7
If you chose to go with a Fox tank and Fox electric pump the sensor could be added at a later date. The resistance range for those sending units are 145 Ohms Full 22 Ohms Empty as referenced from LMR's site here. The II's resistance range is less as quoted from another old thread here:

feeble said:
73 ohms empty and 10 ohms full, give or take...
Click to expand...

I guess it would depend on your budget and what you could find through a salvage yard or through places like Ebay and Craigslist/Marketplace, but the best solution is probably going ahead and spending the ~$175-200 on a new replacement tank instead of going with a different style (fuel cell, Fox tank, etc....). There were no replacement tanks available when I did mine, they are a relatively recent offering. But given the supporting pieces and extra work, the others will most likely keep increasing the total amount of money involved. So I guess I retract my statement on this path probably being the most expensive UNLESS you're able to find a Fox tank in a salvage yard for ~$50..... but even then it might be a wash. I will add, though, that if you were to EVER decide to install fuel injection, a Fox tank gives you a couple options more easily than a stock tank.

Side note: if you happen to have Amazon Prime and can take advantage of free shipping, you can get a new tank for $166 and some change....

 
Last edited: Jan 18, 2024
Reactions: extra_stout and JackH
J

JackH

Active Member
Jan 8, 2024
39
34
28
San Diego, CA
Jan 18, 2024
#8
  • Jan 18, 2024
  • #8
LILCBRA said:
If you chose to go with a Fox tank and Fox electric pump the sensor could be added at a later date. The resistance range for those sending units are 145 Ohms Full 22 Ohms Empty as referenced from LMR's site here. The II's resistance range is less as quoted from another old thread here:



I guess it would depend on your budget and what you could find through a salvage yard or through places like Ebay and Craigslist/Marketplace, but the best solution is probably going ahead and spending the ~$175-200 on a new replacement tank instead of going with a different style (fuel cell, Fox tank, etc....). There were no replacement tanks available when I did mine, they are a relatively recent offering. But given the supporting pieces and extra work, the others will most likely keep increasing the total amount of money involved. So I guess I retract my statement on this path probably being the most expensive UNLESS you're able to find a Fox tank in a salvage yard for ~$50..... but even then it might be a wash. I will add, though, that if you were to EVER decide to install fuel injection, a Fox tank gives you a couple options more easily than a stock tank.

Side note: if you happen to have Amazon Prime and can take advantage of free shipping, you can get a new tank for $166 and some change....

Click to expand...
I do have prime but mine is a 78 so it's my understanding that the 74-76 tank wont work right? I think you are correct though and I did find a 77-78 tank for around $245.
 
Reactions: LILCBRA

LILCBRA

I wish I didn't have all of these balls in the air
Mod Dude
Dec 6, 2005
6,378
5,363
194
Corn County USA
Jan 18, 2024
#9
  • Jan 18, 2024
  • #9
Sorry, forgot you said it was a 78....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fuel Gas tank seal
  • jeremyzcook82
  • Nov 21, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 1, 2025
manicmechanic007
I
Adding Ac
  • IICrew
  • Jul 3, 2022
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 2
Replies
34
Views
4K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Aug 23, 2022
LILCBRA
90 LX - new gas tank and tank skid plate/plastic cover won't fit
  • Mike SVOR
  • Oct 29, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
988
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 29, 2021
90sickfox
P
2018 Rims on 1965 Mustang
  • PsuedoCode
  • Nov 15, 2021
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 15, 2021
PsuedoCode
P
1
Fuel Gas Tank Replacement Parts Checklist - Where to buy? - 1987 Notchback Preservation
  • 1987Notcher
  • Dec 16, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 25, 2019
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?