• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Gears

  • Thread starter Thread starter LIZARDKING
  • Start date Start date Mar 31, 2016

LIZARDKING

Active Member
Nov 16, 2004
21
14
28
Hell
Mar 31, 2016
#1
  • Mar 31, 2016
  • #1
Our 94 GT vert has 3.08 gears. They suck.

Ive been thinking about a set of 3.55s.

I can buy a set of new take-out 3.31s for $40 shipped.

Im wondering if its worth going from 3.08s to 3.331s or not.
 

jozsefsz

15 Year Member
Aug 11, 2013
1,243
332
124
Cleveland OH Area
Apr 2, 2016
#2
  • Apr 2, 2016
  • #2
Well it all depends on what you care about. I have the 3.08's and I've never had an issue since my car is a stick (as yours appears to be). The final drive ratio is completely in my control, and with a turbo it's actually a benefit. If you do a lot of highway driving or cruising gears will have a negative effect. They're really much more beneficial on an automatic.

With that all said, if you were trying to go a little more crazy with gearing, 3.73's would be the tallest I'd go with on a street car. 3.31's will give you about 7.5% more revs per MPH than the 3.08's. 3.55's will give you about 15% more revs per MPH than 3.08's. On a stick you probably wouldn't find anything in ET's since you can just slip the clutch and leave it in a lower gear a little longer and get the same or larger effect. Or heck, get some lower profile tires.

With that all said again, $40 bucks is pretty cheap. If you DIY then you'll see some improvement and it may be worth it to you. Though a set of 3.55's is only going to set you back about $150 (either way you'll want an install kit with shims / bearings / etc. so about another $80) so if that's what you really want, get what you really want. If you pay for labor, then the difference between the $40 and $150 will even more quickly disappear.

So I realize this was thoroughly unhelpful. Remembering my car before I went forced induction, my problem was never the gear ratio. I could spin the tires all day long (plenty of torque) with the 3.08's and have complete control of rev-range with the stick. Where the car fell apart was its inability to breathe above 4000rpm, which gears will only make worse. I know everyone recommends gears as the first performance upgrade, I don't really agree with a manual trans.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 2, 2016
#3
  • Apr 2, 2016
  • #3
I don't think going from 3.08's to 3.31's will satisfy your needs. The mechanical advantage between those gear sets isn't very significant.

I went from 3.08's to 3.73 in my much lighter Fox body Coupe and found them "adequate" when in was stock.

Considering your cars weight, I wouldn't go with anything under 3.73.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,154
21,325
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 2, 2016
#4
  • Apr 2, 2016
  • #4
Coffee first, THEN post.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 2, 2016
#5
  • Apr 2, 2016
  • #5
Noobz347 said:
Coffee first, THEN post.
Click to expand...
That'll teach teach me for replying on a cell phone. Gotta love apples autocorrect.
 

2L8ULUZ2

Will kiss Moderator ass for title
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2000
3,033
14
99
WNC
Apr 29, 2016
#6
  • Apr 29, 2016
  • #6
Go 3.73 and call it a day. Our cars like the lower gears to get it moving. Oh and nice to see someone else on here with a red interior SN95!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Hello, core supports for '86 vs '90-3, i need some answers if anyone knows
  • Pony Dr.Mike
  • Mar 14, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
7
Views
318
The Welcome Wagon Mar 15, 2026
95steedamustang
O
My rebirth, Hi from PA
  • onemore1987
  • Jun 28, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
134
The Welcome Wagon Jun 29, 2026
onemore1987
O
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
931
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
590
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
J
For Sale MASTER LISTING: Abandoned '66 Mustang Restomod Part-Out (Wilwood, Ididit, Quick Performance, Mishimoto)
  • JasonB66
  • Jul 23, 2026
  • Suspension
Replies
0
Views
84
Suspension Jul 23, 2026
JasonB66
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?