• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Getting rid of the X-Pipe raspiness! Baffles are the answer!

  • Thread starter Thread starter bunny_power
  • Start date Start date Aug 27, 2004

bunny_power

New Member
Aug 13, 2003
170
0
0
Edmonton
Aug 27, 2004
#1
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #1
-I posted this over in the SVT forum, but figured you guys might like to know too.-

My car was way way too loud. I've got an M55 3" catback and O/R X and it was really really raspy and really really really incredibly *****ing loud, so loud that I got a ticket for it a couple of weeks ago.

After searching around I found the answer in the form of some 3" Bassani baffles. They just came in and I installed them last night. The difference is dramatic! No more rasp, and the volume has been cut down about 30%, which means that my car is still LOUD, but its not eardrum splitting, blood coming out of your ears obnoxiously loud, and they really smoothed out the tone of the exhaust too. There is no more high pitched rasp, just a smooth aggressive tone. It sounds perfect now!

The best part is that because they simply fit into the end of the tailpipes you can remove them if you want to go to the track and scare babies and they don't reduce the performance gain you get from going with O/R pipes.

NOTE: I'm not posting this to start an O/R vs cats or X vs H debate just to share some info.
 

MyEarsHurt

New Member
May 21, 2004
918
0
0
Aug 27, 2004
#2
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #2
Where did you buy the baffles from?
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Aug 27, 2004
#3
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #3
I would imagine he got the 3" Bassani baffles from Bassani. I dunno dude, tough call.
 

70stangcoupe

Founding Member
Nov 12, 2001
2,895
0
0
Winston-Salem, NC
Aug 27, 2004
#4
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #4
I think Summit sells these too. LMAO @ scaring babies. lol
 

Blue Blurr

New Member
Apr 1, 2004
279
0
0
California
Aug 27, 2004
#5
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #5
its captin nixon from easy company.... haha (302 coupe's avator). Band of Brothers waqs one of the best WWII evar
 
H

huesmann

Founding Member
Jun 21, 2002
332
0
16
Aug 27, 2004
#6
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #6
Blue Blurr said:
its captin nixon from easy company.... haha (302 coupe's avator). Band of Brothers waqs one of the best WWII evar
Click to expand...
Same dude but the pic looks like it's from "Office Space" to me...
 
R

rjstaaf

Founding Member
May 31, 2002
1,310
2
39
Somewhere
Aug 27, 2004
#7
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #7
Seems kind of silly to me to spend the money to put on a free flowing exhaust only to restrict it with baffles. I tried them when I first got my Magnaflow catback in the hopes of quieting the drone at 2K. I drove around with them for a couple of days, took them out and sold them to someone else.
 

WhiteDevil69

New Member
Sep 15, 2003
518
0
0
Tucson, AZ
Aug 27, 2004
#8
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #8
rjstaaf said:
Seems kind of silly to me to spend the money to put on a free flowing exhaust only to restrict it with baffles. I tried them when I first got my Magnaflow catback in the hopes of quieting the drone at 2K. I drove around with them for a couple of days, took them out and sold them to someone else.
Click to expand...
gotta look at his combo to understand, a magnaflow catback by itself is already quiet..add an o/r x-pipe and its loud, his combo was probly rediculous..at his point i could understand wanted a little mufflage. I already have to keep it under 2k rpms when a cop is near or that harrass me
 
R

rjstaaf

Founding Member
May 31, 2002
1,310
2
39
Somewhere
Aug 27, 2004
#9
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #9
WhiteDevil69 said:
gotta look at his combo to understand, a magnaflow catback by itself is already quiet..add an o/r x-pipe and its loud, his combo was probly rediculous..at his point i could understand wanted a little mufflage. I already have to keep it under 2k rpms when a cop is near or that harrass me
Click to expand...

I understand his setup just fine. If the sound is the only thing he is worried about I guess the baffles will do the trick. I just can't see spending the money to open up the exhaust and then plug it with baffles. The baffles will negate a lot of the gains from the off road X. Look at the pic of mine below. See how much narrower the baffle is in the middle, tell me that is not restricing flow. If the sound is that much of a problem I would go with a catted X rather than use baffles.

 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
Aug 27, 2004
#10
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #10
o/r x and magnaflows dumped are only loud when you want them to be...dont know what you guys think is loud, but i think an x with race bullets is it
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Aug 27, 2004
#11
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #11
The use of baffles baffles me.
(sorry, couldn't resist)
 

mity2

I like Pro3 and all I got was this crappy CT.
Jul 24, 2003
2,872
3
48
StateCollege PA
Aug 27, 2004
#12
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #12
my set up has no raspiness whats so ever. But its not X-pipe either
 

bunny_power

New Member
Aug 13, 2003
170
0
0
Edmonton
Aug 31, 2004
#13
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #13
rjstaaf said:
I understand his setup just fine. If the sound is the only thing he is worried about I guess the baffles will do the trick. I just can't see spending the money to open up the exhaust and then plug it with baffles. The baffles will negate a lot of the gains from the off road X. Look at the pic of mine below. See how much narrower the baffle is in the middle, tell me that is not restricing flow. If the sound is that much of a problem I would go with a catted X rather than use baffles.

Click to expand...

From memory I would estimate that the baffle reduces the inner diameter of the exhaust (at the tip) from 3" to about 2.5", which also happens to be the size of tubing used for most aftermarket catbacks so there is no "restriction" going on per se. My xpipe is 2.5", the catback is 3", so the effective choke point is going to be the upstream X, not the baffle.

Although if for some reason you think that putting a 3.5-4" tip onto a 2.5" tube somehow increases exhaust flow then I'm afraid you should have bought a Honda.
 

bunny_power

New Member
Aug 13, 2003
170
0
0
Edmonton
Aug 31, 2004
#14
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #14
Jackie Chan said:
o/r x and magnaflows dumped are only loud when you want them to be...dont know what you guys think is loud, but i think an x with race bullets is it
Click to expand...

LOL, mine was louder than that.
 
S

sixstringthing

New Member
Aug 11, 2003
297
0
0
Aug 31, 2004
#15
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #15
I don't agree with the 'why spend all that money to open up your exhaust just to restrict it with baffles... why not just get a catted X-Pipe instead"

Because an o/r X with baffles is still cheaper than a catted-X, plus you can take the baffles out.
 

1992 2.3LX

New Member
Dec 5, 2002
885
0
0
Ky
Aug 31, 2004
#16
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #16
bunny_power said:
From memory I would estimate that the baffle reduces the inner diameter of the exhaust (at the tip) from 3" to about 2.5", which also happens to be the size of tubing used for most aftermarket catbacks so there is no "restriction" going on per se. My xpipe is 2.5", the catback is 3", so the effective choke point is going to be the upstream X, not the baffle.

Although if for some reason you think that putting a 3.5-4" tip onto a 2.5" tube somehow increases exhaust flow then I'm afraid you should have bought a Honda.
Click to expand...

i would have to agree with the logic here
 
R

rjstaaf

Founding Member
May 31, 2002
1,310
2
39
Somewhere
Aug 31, 2004
#17
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #17
bunny_power said:
From memory I would estimate that the baffle reduces the inner diameter of the exhaust (at the tip) from 3" to about 2.5", which also happens to be the size of tubing used for most aftermarket catbacks so there is no "restriction" going on per se. My xpipe is 2.5", the catback is 3", so the effective choke point is going to be the upstream X, not the baffle.

Although if for some reason you think that putting a 3.5-4" tip onto a 2.5" tube somehow increases exhaust flow then I'm afraid you should have bought a Honda.
Click to expand...

Since we are going on memory and estimating here I said what I did based on my memory of the reduction in the inner diameter being less than 2.5.

Darn, I should have kept mine I probably could have gotten twice what I paid for them from you guys.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
A
2003 GT 4.6 - Best exhaust from 3 options
  • Aj03gt
  • Feb 26, 2019
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
7K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2019
Dark04GT
S
New owner of 2001 Bullitt #5307
  • Stig34
  • Jul 25, 2018
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
2K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2018
Stig34
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?