• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

glass packs good idea or not?????????

  • Thread starter Thread starter x73mach1x
  • Start date Start date Jul 22, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
X

x73mach1x

New Member
Jul 3, 2005
65
0
0
maine
Jul 22, 2005
#1
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #1
k i was wonering if any one has used some glass packs on there mustang and if so how good do they work... i dont really want to spend to much money on a exhaust system at this point in the game and was wondering if glass packs would be a good cheap choice... but my concern is that the glass packs will rob me of horsepower.... my engine is going to be about 500 horse when its done and i dont want to take that away from it threw a my exhaust....
 

MustangMatt1966

New Member
Mar 11, 2004
1,004
1
0
Orlando Fl.
Jul 22, 2005
#2
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #2
when i had my engine built i didnt have money for an exhaust sysyem, so in summit there were these things called purple hornies, they are glasspack mufflers that have a turndown tip on them...they are loud as all hell and sound great...but i dont think im loosing power at all...but i think i am loosing my hearing haha
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Jul 22, 2005
#3
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #3
Personally, I don't like the sound of glasspacks at all.

They do wear out.

If you can afford 500hp, you can afford some decent mufflers.

Oh... and where the heck did you find a 4speed FMX?
 

Cobain03

Active Member
Aug 27, 2003
996
0
36
Lexington, Ky
Jul 22, 2005
#4
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #4
i've got glasspacks on mine. they sound alright, not deep and throaty like i would like but they get the job done.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Jul 22, 2005
#5
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #5
if you want to sound like the teen down the street,do it,but if you want to build this car and do it right, dont get cheap on the exhaust,youll just end up replacing it.
 
T

THX 138

Member
Oct 7, 2004
375
0
16
Los Angeles
Jul 22, 2005
#6
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #6
through
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Jul 22, 2005
#7
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #7
Glasspacks sound great on a mild car like mine, but with 500 h.p. they are going to be really loud. You won't lose h.p. if money and power are your only concerns. I think I paid about $15 each for my 2 1/2" glasspacks but that's been a few years back. I have had several people ask me if I was running Flowmasters. I can't see paying high dollar for 3 h.p. and a certain sound.
 
M

my66coupe

Founding Member
Apr 30, 2002
1,134
0
36
Arizona fountain hills
Jul 22, 2005
#8
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #8
I had once considered this route when building my exhaust system. Due to funds it seemed the best and most practical way at the time. After putting one on a 440 dodge.....and noticed how much low end power i had losted, I was turned off. The design is straight through, not a single baffle, chamber etc.....making it near impossible to make back pressure. The worst part overall, is that they wear out......My original flowmaster 40s had me at start up.

Mike
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Jul 22, 2005
#9
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #9
I was wondering about the 4 spd FMX too...

what are the specs on the 500 hp cleveland?
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Jul 22, 2005
#10
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #10
No offense to anyone that has them, but all the cars that I have heard have sounded horrible with them, they are loud though I will give you that.

If money is a problem look on ebay, you can probably find some used flowmasters or something pretty cheap.
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Jul 22, 2005
#11
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #11
Coolblue, no offense taken, but on a stock or nearly stock car, they are quiet enough to carry on a conversation at cruising speed and loud when you get on it. With his h.p. levels, they would be obnoxious as crap though. In other words, the same muffler will exhibit totally different sound characteristics on a 200 h.p. car and a 500 h.p. car.
Everybody is right though... don't put glasspacks on that engine.
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Jul 22, 2005
#12
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #12
About noise.

Glasspacks are like any other muffler. You can get quieter and louder versions.

In a glasspack muffler, the longer the muffler, the quieter the exhaust. Much like a regular muffer in that the more chambers it has, the quieter it tends to be.

As a rule of tumb, glasspacks are very loud but that's because people tend to buy the cheaper and shorter versions.
 

12sec67

Active Member
Oct 6, 2003
1,301
1
36
San Diego, Ca
Jul 22, 2005
#13
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #13
Summit Has Mufflers That Are Supposed To Flow More Then Flowmasters And There Are Not Loud And They Are About $25.00
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Jul 22, 2005
#14
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #14
12sec67 said:
Summit Has Mufflers That Are Supposed To Flow More Then Flowmasters And There Are Not Loud And They Are About $25.00
Click to expand...

I agree with this thinking. You can get some decent no-name type of mufflers that flow well for pretty cheap. Mufflers on my truck are a good example. Sound pretty good, flow pretty good, and only cost $55 each.
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Jul 22, 2005
#15
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #15
leave the glasspacks to the guys with beat up Z71's....they are not a performance muffler.

The hooker aero-chamber has the best flow numbers of any generic muffler. It will flow better, be quieter, and have better sound than any glasspack.
 
X

x73mach1x

New Member
Jul 3, 2005
65
0
0
maine
Jul 22, 2005
#16
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #16
k thanx guys really apprecate it.. the cleveland isnt 500 hp yet but its going to be in about a couple of months when school starts.... my auto tec teacher builds race engines as a part time job and he said he could easily make 500 if i wanted to spend the money which im going to.... my FMX i thought was a 4 speed maybe i was wrong i dont have as much years behind me as some of your guys out there do.... i havent really looked at my tranny much im more worried of geting the car ready for interior and paint..... but what is it a 3 speed???? also sence we are on the topic what does FMX stand for and would it hold up against a high horse powered cleveland...
PS. probally go with some 40 series flows..are hooker headers a good choice??? i was thinking about them as well
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jul 22, 2005
#17
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #17
There is someone in the classic classifieds selling a set of used turbo mufflers from dynomax I think it was. For like 50 obo.
 
X

x73mach1x

New Member
Jul 3, 2005
65
0
0
maine
Jul 22, 2005
#18
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #18
i might have to look into that thanx
 
J

johnsstang04

Member
Jun 26, 2005
80
0
7
Phoenix, Arizona
Jul 22, 2005
#19
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #19
I put the turbo mufflers on a mustang a while back. They worked fine and had a deep sound, although I really wasn't paying attention to horsepower. As for the FMX, it might be able to handle the 500hp, but a C6 trans would probably be better. Mustangs didn't have 4 speed automatics, only three speed. The C4, FMX, and C6 are the automatic transmissions Ford used. C4 being the least capable to handle horsepower (although very reliable) and the C6 being the best.
 

12sec67

Active Member
Oct 6, 2003
1,301
1
36
San Diego, Ca
Jul 22, 2005
#20
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #20
johnsstang04 said:
automatic transmissions Ford used. C4 being the least capable to handle horsepower (although very reliable) and the C6 being the best.
Click to expand...

people tend to have the C4 built instead of using a C6 because the C6 takes some much power to turn it which leads to horsepower loss. the C4 can handle a lot of horse power if built correctly....


ask 10secgoal!
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Fox Build ideas for the 'Hudson Heap' (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Sep 19, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 27, 2023
MadSquirrelTech
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?