• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Going from a 5.0 to 4.6 need advice

  • Thread starter Thread starter ep87
  • Start date Start date Feb 13, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
E

ep87

New Member
May 19, 2004
16
0
0
Vancouver, WA
Feb 13, 2006
#1
  • Feb 13, 2006
  • #1
Hi

I've owned 2 5.0 mustangs and decided to get a 96-98 sn95 type mustang.
I found a low mileage (72,000) 96 4.6 gt automatic, that I'm real interested in, but I know It's the first year for that motor, is there any common problems they had with that year that I should look out for, or maybe concider a 97-98.
thanks in advance for any info.

Richard
 

Skidzz

Tinkerbell
Apr 11, 2005
328
1
19
Salt Lake City, UT
Feb 13, 2006
#2
  • Feb 13, 2006
  • #2
I can't really think of any problems that the 96 has that the 97-98 don't have. Your biggest concer should be the intake manifold. Make sure it has the aluminum crossover, and if it doesn't, tell the person you want about $750 off the price because if it has the plastic crossover and it hasn't cracked yet, it will soon. I bought my car with 55k on it and the damn crossover cracked at 58k. Make sure you take care of that first. Also, before you buy it, crawl under it and make sure that there is no oil around the differential or the back of the mufflers, if you find any oil anywhere it might have a diff. leak. This is another problem I had because I didn't check before I bought it. Only $100 to fix though because I caught it early enough. Other than that, just make sure the car was well taken care of.
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Feb 13, 2006
#3
  • Feb 13, 2006
  • #3
You absolutely should get 99+ much more HP
 

Skidzz

Tinkerbell
Apr 11, 2005
328
1
19
Salt Lake City, UT
Feb 13, 2006
#4
  • Feb 13, 2006
  • #4
Kilgore Trout said:
You absolutely should get 99+ much more HP
Click to expand...
Or get a 96-98 and do the PI swap, then have the power in a better looking car
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Feb 13, 2006
#5
  • Feb 13, 2006
  • #5
I respectfully disagree, 99+ looks better
 

ironmedic

New Member
Mar 18, 2003
1,361
0
0
Puyallup, WA
Feb 13, 2006
#6
  • Feb 13, 2006
  • #6
yeah go 99 and higher. i would stick with the 5.0 dude! more parts and 5.0's are king! lol! i miss my old 5.0!
 

COramprat

...I can take it. I think.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
8,474
1,463
223
Sea of Tranquility
Feb 13, 2006
#7
  • Feb 13, 2006
  • #7
It will be weak for sure...nothing that a cam swap and 4.10's won't perk up.
 
R

rb20100

New Member
Feb 13, 2006
6
0
0
Feb 13, 2006
#8
  • Feb 13, 2006
  • #8
Kilgore Trout said:
I respectfully disagree, 99+ looks better
Click to expand...
yeah 99+ is better
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
Feb 13, 2006
#9
  • Feb 13, 2006
  • #9
rb20100 said:
yeah 99+ is better
Click to expand...


+1
 

mineralgray2002

New Member
Dec 4, 2005
33
2
0
Centralia, Illinois
Feb 13, 2006
#10
  • Feb 13, 2006
  • #10
+1 for 99-04, no 05-06s they ugly
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Feb 13, 2006
#11
  • Feb 13, 2006
  • #11
what i would recomend for that car.

PI head swap with PI cams or better 4.10's, sct2, 2800-3200 stall converter, j-mod, longtubes, off-road x, some sort of exhaust system that suits your sound tastes. since it's a auto weld the tourqe boxes and axle tubes install 31 spline carrier and axles, upr control arms, remove frt sway bar and swap to 15 inch rims and slicks. drive to nearest dragway and run it.
 
E

ep87

New Member
May 19, 2004
16
0
0
Vancouver, WA
Feb 14, 2006
#12
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #12
Thanks guys I - appreciate all the info. one of the reasons I'm interested in this 96 is the price, the cars super clean, and I can pick it up for 6k. the car will be for my wife, and I'm all ready planning some mod's. This will leave lots in the budget for my Drag car.
thanks again.
 
E

ep87

New Member
May 19, 2004
16
0
0
Vancouver, WA
Feb 14, 2006
#13
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #13
Just one more question. do the 96 gt's come stock with a shock tower brace.
 

1LowGT

New Member
Sep 4, 2005
294
0
0
st louis mo.
Feb 14, 2006
#14
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #14
some
 

sgarlic

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2001
3,085
1
56
Feb 14, 2006
#15
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #15
You said it's the wife's car? If so, who cares about power or strut tower braces?

Buy a 99+ .. less work, less mods just to bring it up to the same level as everyone else, and much much nicer looking body.. oh.. and you'll eliminate those ugly spark plug wires in the engine bay which those 96-98 guys are stuck with.
 

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
Feb 14, 2006
#16
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #16
I would not get it. a 96 stock auto is a 15sec car. I guess if power is not an issue. I was not impressed with the used 98 I drove when I was buying my stang and it was a 5 speed. I can't imagine if it were a stock auto.

I would at least look for a 99+ and test drive it. 96 brakes are not a nice either. so since it is the wifes car give he a bit more stopping power.
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Feb 14, 2006
#17
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #17
In the long run that car will cost a lot more than if you started with 99+

The PI swap is too expensive IMHO... Cheaper in the long run to just start with 99+

So, what "feels" like a good deal at 6k will ultimately not be based on your stated goals for the car.

Walk away from this deal mang.
 

chris kelvin

New Member
Sep 11, 2005
67
0
0
Feb 14, 2006
#18
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #18
Honestly if i was gonna get 96-98...i'd STRONGLY look past them and get a 94 or 95 sn95 5.0l.... Not just cause of the 5.0, just because i feel that 5.0 has alot more out their that's easy to come by and cheaper, mods wise..

Look up plastic intake crack, and spark plug blow out...not pretty with 4.6's...i never heard of a 5.0 doing that.

Just to add did you drive a 4.6 yet..? If you like 5.0's you will not like 4.6's.. The 4.6 makes power much higher then the 5.0 and stock for stock the 5.0 is more 'fun' 0-60 wise..lol.

PS, the 302 has a much better exhaust note...omg don't even get me started.
 

sgarlic

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2001
3,085
1
56
Feb 14, 2006
#19
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #19
The SN95 5.0's were way underpowered.. And don't forget about the 5.0 era issues if you're going to downtalk the 4.6 cars because of the intake. Broken ashtray doors, eratic idling, headlight switch overheating, 2.73 gears stock, are just a few examples of issues on the foxbody's I thought of in 5 seconds.
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Feb 14, 2006
#20
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #20
ep87 said:
Thanks guys I - appreciate all the info. one of the reasons I'm interested in this 96 is the price, the cars super clean, and I can pick it up for 6k. the car will be for my wife, and I'm all ready planning some mod's. This will leave lots in the budget for my Drag car.
thanks again.
Click to expand...


oh it's for the wife. then add some more power mods to my list

sounds like this car is a good deal.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
WTB: Procharger or Vortech Supercharger – 1996–1998 Mustang GT 4.6 2V – Budget $3,200
  • 96mustang.gt
  • Nov 20, 2025
  • Want to Buy
Replies
1
Views
331
Want to Buy May 3, 2026
roblabsn95
R
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Tuesday at 3:59 PM
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
151
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Saturday at 8:05 PM
AeroCoupe
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
After a decade, I am no longer Stangless!
  • Jsmiley
  • May 27, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2024
manicmechanic007
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?