Ok some are suggesting that it's definitely the way to go but I haven't had a lot of feedback as to why it would be far more beneficial other than it seems to be a piece of mind to not rely on a meter that's calibrated from a company. Then there's this video that I just watched while googling information as to exacty what the slot meters are, what choices do i have if I were to go that route, ect. That video shows that the Pro M meters ( calibrated from a company), seem to be on the same level if not better as far as what it shows on the graph than the slot styles and others comparabe. I have heard the names SCT BA 2600 and 3000 and a video from american muscle shows that it's a type that seems to be for forced induction but seems it can be used on cars prior to 99 but the car will need to be tuned.
So please enlighten me on this whole matter and in the meantime I'll keep reading up to try and get a better understanding of the whole lingo of just what these meters are about.
Oh and also it seems going to this one thread, going slot style actually you get rid of the IAT sensor and maf sensor being 2 seperate connections and combines them into one. And my car is going to be a 331 Na and going to get a dyno tune. I am going to get another 95 after I build it and will be doing a 400.
link to video:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_rBtdQ_2Zk
So please enlighten me on this whole matter and in the meantime I'll keep reading up to try and get a better understanding of the whole lingo of just what these meters are about.
Oh and also it seems going to this one thread, going slot style actually you get rid of the IAT sensor and maf sensor being 2 seperate connections and combines them into one. And my car is going to be a 331 Na and going to get a dyno tune. I am going to get another 95 after I build it and will be doing a 400.
link to video:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_rBtdQ_2Zk
Last edited:
