• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Going to dyno tonight

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pops Fun
  • Start date Start date Dec 30, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Pops Fun

10 Year Member
Feb 15, 2003
961
14
59
Cincinnati, Ohio
Dec 30, 2004
#1
  • Dec 30, 2004
  • #1
Hi
Going to the Dyno tonight for a tune.... Paul's auto Engr.

Had 280rwhp then went 347ci hoping for 320rwhp what do you think?

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=527588

Mac Shorty Header
TFS TW Heads ported
Steeda 19 Cam TDC
Cobra Intake ported matched
FMS 65mm T/B
Pro-M 75MM MAF
Under Drive Pullies
Ford 3.73 Gear
Aluminum Flywheel
Steeda 24# injectors
H&S 1.72 Roller Rockers
MSD 6al
Blaster coil
Walbro 255 LPH
Cold Air Kit
Flowmaster Exhaust
Tokico Shocks & Struts
Timing chain and Gear
Lowered (Eibach 52/94)
Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter
TF Girdle
Eagle Forged crank
Canton 7qt. pan
Hi Volume oil pump
 

mytight95

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,605
0
46
Dothan,Al
Dec 30, 2004
#2
  • Dec 30, 2004
  • #2
good luck......hope you get at least that


jason
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Dec 30, 2004
#3
  • Dec 30, 2004
  • #3
Much of the stuff you got on the 347 is small. A more aggressive induction (Edelbrock RPM Intake, 70 or 75MM TB, 80MM Maf, Powerpipe), exhaust (Long Tubes, X pipe) and custom cam will get you a lot more power. Hopefully you get your 320.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 30, 2004
#4
  • Dec 30, 2004
  • #4
I think I said 310hp/350tq in your first thread. I'm guessing thats the most you'll see since the intake and cam are very small and so are the headers. TFS R intake, 90mm TB and an fti or jay allen cam and you'll be 400+ with those ported TW heads. You have the full flow/spec sheet on them? You'll need it when you call for your custom camshaft.
 

Pops Fun

10 Year Member
Feb 15, 2003
961
14
59
Cincinnati, Ohio
Dec 30, 2004
#5
  • Dec 30, 2004
  • #5
Hi,
Well it's done.
Well the numbers are in, I gained an average of 45rwhp over the entire run and an average of 54 Ft-lbs. of Torque:
Here is the sheet:
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Dec 30, 2004
#6
  • Dec 30, 2004
  • #6
NICE! I always wondered if the old saying of 1cube=1hp when changing nothing else held true... it seems it does!
 

AznStanger3v

Active Member
Aug 11, 2003
2,026
0
47
Northern VA
Dec 30, 2004
#7
  • Dec 30, 2004
  • #7
very nice numbers
 

Pops Fun

10 Year Member
Feb 15, 2003
961
14
59
Cincinnati, Ohio
Dec 30, 2004
#8
  • Dec 30, 2004
  • #8
VibrantRedGT said:
Much of the stuff you got on the 347 is small. A more aggressive induction (Edelbrock RPM Intake, 70 or 75MM TB, 80MM Maf, Powerpipe), exhaust (Long Tubes, X pipe) and custom cam will get you a lot more power. Hopefully you get your 320.
Click to expand...

Ed just finished the specs on my cam. Trying to decide when to do it?? Just had it apart so might wait til summer. When the money is refurbished.

The intake, TB, MAF, etc. haven't decided what to do.
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Dec 30, 2004
#9
  • Dec 30, 2004
  • #9
 

Pops Fun

10 Year Member
Feb 15, 2003
961
14
59
Cincinnati, Ohio
Dec 30, 2004
#10
  • Dec 30, 2004
  • #10
Grn92LX said:
I think I said 310hp/350tq in your first thread. I'm guessing thats the most you'll see since the intake and cam are very small and so are the headers. TFS R intake, 90mm TB and an fti or jay allen cam and you'll be 400+ with those ported TW heads. You have the full flow/spec sheet on them? You'll need it when you call for your custom camshaft.
Click to expand...

Ed has already spec'ed the cam, along with Buddy Rawlins, the intake and TB I have thought about, also thought about having the Cobra intake extruded...

Steve
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Dec 30, 2004
#11
  • Dec 30, 2004
  • #11
Those numbers arent bad at all. Especially with how small everything u got on there. Do the cam, and a 75mm tbody and an intake mani. You should pick up some for sure
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Dec 30, 2004
#12
  • Dec 30, 2004
  • #12
Congrats, very nice curves. The drop in highe4r rpm TQ/HP shows the limiting runner cross section.

What do the ported heads flow? If they flow more than 260cfm, then go to a different intake - RPMII, Holley, Track Heat or the like.
 

Pops Fun

10 Year Member
Feb 15, 2003
961
14
59
Cincinnati, Ohio
Dec 30, 2004
#13
  • Dec 30, 2004
  • #13
tmoss said:
"Congrats, very nice curves. The drop in highe4r rpm TQ/HP shows the limiting runner cross section.

What do the ported heads flow? If they flow more than 260cfm, then go to a different intake - RPMII, Holley, Track Heat or the like."

Hi Tom,
Here are the numbers I have for the heads. I don't really understand them.. Suggestions?? This is what I sent to the cam people..
I thought the drop was due to the cam??

Intake Port Volume (cc’s) 192____ Port Length (in.) __5 “__

Flow Bench Data: Intake Flow at _28__” H2O, Are these values with intake manifold in place? (Y/N) ___No
69__ _@.100”,
141__ @.200”,
201__ @.300”,
243__ @.400”,
280__ @.500”,


Exhaust Header (O.D. in.) __1 5/8__ Shorty style header? (Y/N) _YExhaust System (O.D. in.) 1 5/8_
Flow Bench Data: Exhaust Flow at 28__”H2O, Are these values with exhaust stub in place Y/N) Y

If exhaust stub is used, what is dia. (O.D. in.) _1 3/4_, stub length (in.)_4,
54 ____@.100”,
110___ @.200”,
142___ @.300”,
174___ @.400”,
196___ @.500”,
210___ @.600”,

Going to a larger intake will lose low end??

A Really confused Steve
Click to expand...
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Dec 30, 2004
#14
  • Dec 30, 2004
  • #14
Steve, those numbers are the head alone. I wouldn't EH a Cobra for those numbers - 192cc head wants a larger cross section intake. Try a RPMII, Holley, or Track Heat. I'm sure ED would recommend on of those too - ask him.
 

Pops Fun

10 Year Member
Feb 15, 2003
961
14
59
Cincinnati, Ohio
Dec 30, 2004
#15
  • Dec 30, 2004
  • #15
Thanks for the info...


Steve
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Dec 30, 2004
#16
  • Dec 30, 2004
  • #16
What about the cam. Isn't a #19 too small for his combo????

But still nice numbers. Your car must be loads of fun to drive.
Scott
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Dec 30, 2004
#17
  • Dec 30, 2004
  • #17
Steve

Way to go

That pull shows you got lots more left in it

Things can only get better if you want to go for more

I told you that with the good stuff to match those good flowing heads the 300rwhp signpost would swiftly go outta sight in your rearview mirror.

A 347 stroker is most definitely a "good stuff" part

Later
Grady
 

Tylerb59

Banned
Mar 7, 2003
1,895
0
0
Arlington, WA
Dec 30, 2004
#18
  • Dec 30, 2004
  • #18
Wow, great numbers!
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 31, 2004
#19
  • Dec 31, 2004
  • #19
Nice, I was about 10 off on my guess What intake are you planning and what are you goals? If you wanna stay mild, i'd use a rpm II or a holley with one of those cam grinders. Definatly use a 75-90mm TB and 1 3/4" longtubes.

Going to a larger intake will lose low end??
Click to expand...

Absolutely NOT! I can show you a graph of a n/a 347 makiing 415ish rwhp (ran high 10's more importantly) making a LOT more low end than you with bigger parts. He had a .600+ solid cam and a TFS R intake with ported afr 185's. Car made a lot more low end than your making. Bigger inches = the need for bigger parts to properly feed them.

Heres the graph- http://www.mustangcentral.net/neil/customers/jeff/jeff347.jpg
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Dec 31, 2004
#20
  • Dec 31, 2004
  • #20
Grn92LX said:
Definatly use a 75-90mm TB and 1 3/4" longtubes.
Click to expand...

75mm on a 347?

Your reputation for "bigger is better" is slipping.

I have some dyno testing of Chevy 350 long tubes that shows best HP/TQ was produced with 1 5/8" headers over 1 3/4" headers below 6,000 rpm. Same cubic inches and very similar power levels. Do your research before choosing the headers.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SOLD For Sale '92 LX Street/Drag car - WV
  • MikeyMustang
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Dec 31, 2025
MikeyMustang
J
  • Locked
SOLD '95 Cobra GR40 Griggs w/410ci forged stroker
  • Jer
  • Oct 24, 2018
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
15
Views
8K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Jan 12, 2022
Jer
J
Black Jack: new best fuel economy
  • FastDriver
  • May 29, 2015
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 40 41 42
Replies
828
Views
171K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 29, 2026
FastDriver
K
New To Stangnet And Foxbodys
  • k8wdx
  • Mar 17, 2014
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
4
Views
764
The Welcome Wagon Mar 23, 2014
1968stang
What Would It Take For 800 Horsies
  • Pops Fun
  • May 28, 2013
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2013
Pops Fun
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?