• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Got the baseline dyno done today

  • Thread starter Thread starter baglock1
  • Start date Start date Jun 12, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
B

baglock1

The Bartender
Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
6,612
1
78
Space Coast, FL
Jun 12, 2004
#1
  • Jun 12, 2004
  • #1
For those of you who read this thread, I finally got the baseline dyno done so I can have an accurate idea of what the intake does for me.

The mods:
K&N
Bassani offroad X-pipe
Bassani quiet thunder catback
ASP pullies
Accesories bypassed
113K miles on a motor that's never had the valve covers removed

The numbers:
232.14 hp @ 4600
304.52 tq @ 3500
(RPM's estimated from graph)

All in all, I'm pretty happy with the results. My A/F was all over the place but generally too rich instead of lean. We'll see what the new fuel system parts do for it.

The basics:
95 GTS, 5.0L, T5, SAE corrected numbers from a Dynojet

Now we'll just have to see how Striped5.0 did with his dyno runs today...
 

swingline

New Member
Sep 18, 2003
1,252
0
0
TCB - Taking Care of Business
Jun 12, 2004
#2
  • Jun 12, 2004
  • #2
Cool. Aren't you putting on a Roush intake? What about heads/cam?
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jun 12, 2004
#3
  • Jun 12, 2004
  • #3
Those are really high numbers for an essentially stock car.
 

VIPERn94Five-0

Founding Member
Apr 28, 2002
3,352
2
58
Poughkeepsie, NY
Jun 12, 2004
#4
  • Jun 12, 2004
  • #4
yeah i agree...thats like 275 +/- at the motor thats a 60 flywheel hp increase from just thouse few mods...impressive


Anthony
 
B

baglock1

The Bartender
Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
6,612
1
78
Space Coast, FL
Jun 12, 2004
#5
  • Jun 12, 2004
  • #5
swingline said:
Cool. Aren't you putting on a Roush intake? What about heads/cam?
Click to expand...

This was the baseline so that I know exactly what the intake (and the stuff it came with: injectors, TB, etc) adds on a relatively stock motor. After the intake install and subsequent dyno run, I'll be dropping on a set of AFR 185s and a custom ground bumpstick followed by yet another dyno pull.

tmoss said:
Those are really high numbers for an essentially stock car.
Click to expand...

I thought the same thing (I went in expecting 215 but actually guessed exactly 232 right before the run), but I've always thought my car was a bit of a factory freak. I always thought it was due to my weight (around 3050#). Had the other cars not run right about where they should, I'd be sceptical of the dyno operator.
 

DougNuts

Founding Member
Jul 11, 2000
2,596
0
47
Georgetown Ky
Jun 12, 2004
#6
  • Jun 12, 2004
  • #6
baglock1 said:
This was the baseline so that I know exactly what the intake (and the stuff it came with: injectors, TB, etc) adds on a relatively stock motor. After the intake install and subsequent dyno run, I'll be dropping on a set of AFR 185s and a custom ground bumpstick followed by yet another dyno pull.
Click to expand...

Let me be the first to say thanks for doing this! It's always helpfull when people dyno between different modifications so everyone can get more accurate and realistic ideas of what to expect. Those numbers are good, but about what I'd expect from a motor in good shape with the accessories bypassed.
 
S

SuperDust22

The Power of Pixie Dust?!
Oct 19, 2003
1,821
0
0
Gilbert,AZ
Jun 12, 2004
#7
  • Jun 12, 2004
  • #7
baglock1 said:
I thought the same thing (I went in expecting 215 but actually guessed exactly 232 right before the run), but I've always thought my car was a bit of a factory freak. I always thought it was due to my weight (around 3050#). Had the other cars not run right about where they should, I'd be sceptical of the dyno operator.
Click to expand...
yeah those numbers seem high. But only weighing 3050 I can wee why. Have you done any weight reduction?
 
B

baglock1

The Bartender
Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
6,612
1
78
Space Coast, FL
Jun 12, 2004
#8
  • Jun 12, 2004
  • #8
DougNuts said:
Those numbers are good, but about what I'd expect from a motor in good shape...
Click to expand...

It's funny you say that because I mentioned today that I wasn't expecting too much because it has 113K miles on it. One of the other guys there reminded me that with the 5.0L motors, the engines that go 250K+ between rebuilds, 113K is almost broke in.
 
B

baglock1

The Bartender
Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
6,612
1
78
Space Coast, FL
Jun 12, 2004
#9
  • Jun 12, 2004
  • #9
SuperDust22 said:
Have you done any weight reduction?
Click to expand...

Ummm, I'd have to say yes. I don't know of any stock 95 GT's weighing that much .

Tubular K member and A-arms
coilovers front and rear
race LCA's (aluminum rod with heims on either end)
no quads
no dogbone
no cats
no smog
'glass hood
V6 interior
no power anything (except steering)
gutted trunk
and a bunch of other cheet I'm forgetting about.

I haven't weighed it recently, but it was 3260# stock. I'm confident that I've dropped 150-200 pounds, but it wouldn't be the first time I was wrong. Even figuring conservatively, there's no way I'm over 3150. My best guess is 3050# - 3100#.
 

DougNuts

Founding Member
Jul 11, 2000
2,596
0
47
Georgetown Ky
Jun 12, 2004
#10
  • Jun 12, 2004
  • #10
baglock1 said:
It's funny you say that because I mentioned today that I wasn't expecting too much because it has 113K miles on it. One of the other guys there reminded me that with the 5.0L motors, the engines that go 250K+ between rebuilds, 113K is almost broke in.
Click to expand...

Exactly, my car ran 9.0 @ 78mph in the 1/8th mile with 186K miles on her with very similar modifications to what you have. God only knows how much it weighs too, approx. 3600lbs? I should have dynoed it then, but I didn't have the money.
 

Yellow302

Member
Mar 2, 2003
789
2
19
NJ
Jun 12, 2004
#11
  • Jun 12, 2004
  • #11
did you run a short belt or something? or no belt at all? That seems very high HP and TQ.
 
S

SuperDust22

The Power of Pixie Dust?!
Oct 19, 2003
1,821
0
0
Gilbert,AZ
Jun 12, 2004
#12
  • Jun 12, 2004
  • #12
Yellow302 said:
or no belt at all?
Click to expand...

What?
 
B

baglock1

The Bartender
Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
6,612
1
78
Space Coast, FL
Jun 12, 2004
#13
  • Jun 12, 2004
  • #13
Yellow302 said:
did you run a short belt or something? or no belt at all? That seems very high HP and TQ.
Click to expand...

Short belt for the alt, psp, and wp.
 
9

94whitesnake

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2002
152
0
0
Allentown, PA
Jun 12, 2004
#14
  • Jun 12, 2004
  • #14
SuperDust22 said:
What?
Click to expand...


You can run the engine without a belt on it, just not for very long. It might make it through a dyno run, but I'm pretty sure it would overheat if you tried a 1/4 mile without a belt.
 

94_Teal_GT

Founding Member
Aug 14, 2002
405
0
0
Palm Bay, FL
Jun 12, 2004
#15
  • Jun 12, 2004
  • #15
Very nice numbers baglock1. I'm looking forward to seeing that intake installed.
 
S

SuperDust22

The Power of Pixie Dust?!
Oct 19, 2003
1,821
0
0
Gilbert,AZ
Jun 12, 2004
#16
  • Jun 12, 2004
  • #16
94whitesnake said:
You can run the engine without a belt on it, just not for very long. It might make it through a dyno run, but I'm pretty sure it would overheat if you tried a 1/4 mile without a belt.
Click to expand...

I did not know that was ever possible
 

ARed1995GT

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
401
0
0
Boca Raton, FL
Jun 12, 2004
#17
  • Jun 12, 2004
  • #17
you learn new things every day
 
B

baglock1

The Bartender
Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
6,612
1
78
Space Coast, FL
Jun 12, 2004
#18
  • Jun 12, 2004
  • #18
But why would you want to? It's not like you're ever going to run that configuration on the street or track. What's the point of wasting a dyno run? Unless of course you've got A, money to burn, or B, your own dyno.
 

go.rei GT

New Member
Nov 29, 2003
267
0
0
Az
Jun 12, 2004
#19
  • Jun 12, 2004
  • #19
Nice! I have similar mileage, and should have similar mods by the end of the summer. I hope my numbers are that high too.
 
9

94whitesnake

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2002
152
0
0
Allentown, PA
Jun 14, 2004
#20
  • Jun 14, 2004
  • #20
baglock1 said:
But why would you want to? It's not like you're ever going to run that configuration on the street or track. What's the point of wasting a dyno run? Unless of course you've got A, money to burn, or B, your own dyno.
Click to expand...

You're right, but I think it was said as a compliment to your high dyno numbers.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Did a baseline for my GT today
  • mbuckcoyote
  • Jun 23, 2011
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 25, 2011
mbuckcoyote
M
I got Dynoed today!
  • mustangfo
  • Apr 17, 2011
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
1K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Apr 20, 2011
mustangfo
M
my 2011GT dyno
  • billfisher
  • Nov 24, 2010
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
8
Views
2K
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Nov 26, 2010
94GTLaserRC
Got a CUSTOM STEEDA Dyno Tune!!
  • 94GTLaserRC
  • Jan 9, 2011
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
19
Views
5K
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Jan 14, 2011
Sparty92
dyno sheets soon but here are the #s (cobra intake)
  • jhonda
  • May 9, 2008
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2008
Fuzion
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?