• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

GT-40 stuff or 100 shot?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nisreo
  • Start date Start date Jun 22, 2009

gt-40 stuff or 100 wet shot

  • GT-40

    Votes: 15 71.4%
  • Nitrous

    Votes: 6 28.6%

  • Total voters
    21

nisreo

New Member
Jul 22, 2006
178
0
0
Jun 22, 2009
#1
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #1
Looking for opinions. Im building my stock motor back up. New crank, bearings, rings gaskets etc... because I want to be able to drive my mustang for the next couple years while I build a blower ready motor.

However I still want something fun to drive and take it to the track a few times.

For about the same price, would you go with explorer heads, intake and a b-cam or a 100 wet shot.

Normally Id jump all over the gt40 stuff and call it a day, but im going to the track in august and im racing a buddy with a supercharged MR2. probably a mid 13 car.... I need to beat him.

Dunno, just want to get your opinion.

Oh and car is pretty much stock right now, got an exhaust, pullies and drag radials.
 

rbonella

Member
Dec 15, 2008
409
6
19
@ home
Jun 22, 2009
#2
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #2
This is just my opinion, but I would do the motor work. Kind of unclear, you building another motor with a blower? If that's the case, maybe nitrous is more practical so you can transfer the system over to the new motor. If all you want is to beat your buddy, go nitrous, but building the old motor would be more fun to drive on a day to day basis, plus I've been there...fillin nitrous bottles gets tire-some and $. 2 years till the new motor? build the old one, and put some gears in your ride
 

nisreo

New Member
Jul 22, 2006
178
0
0
Jun 22, 2009
#3
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #3
yea, money is tight, so im estimating a couple years on the stand to build a motor ready for a blower. 347 with all the bolt ons and such. Im sure its not going to be cheap/

As far as gears, I have some that will be going in this year. 3.31's. Probably should have mentioned that.
 

nisreo

New Member
Jul 22, 2006
178
0
0
Jun 22, 2009
#4
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #4
gt40 seems to be sweeping the poll, as I thought it would. Am I gonna faster than mis 13's with this setup? Keep in mind it will be a fresh motor. I know its hard to tell, cause different foxes will run different times with the same setup.
 

faststang90

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2007
522
16
49
baytown texas
Jun 22, 2009
#5
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #5
i say a nos would be the fastest way to do it and cheapest way. i would do a 3:55 gear. my old car ran 13.40s on motor and a best of 12.18 on a wet 100 shot. just make sure u have a bigger fuel pump and a adjustable reg and u will be safe
 

rbonella

Member
Dec 15, 2008
409
6
19
@ home
Jun 22, 2009
#6
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #6
now I'm siding with faststang90. Go nitrous. but yeah, you need enough fuel pump and a regulator. Put a 100 shot on it and watch your friend in your rearview the whole race! No need to build 2 motors
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,226
17,911
224
Massachusetts
Jun 22, 2009
#7
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #7
GT-40. I'd rather have power all the time than have to keep filling a bottle
 

nisreo

New Member
Jul 22, 2006
178
0
0
Jun 23, 2009
#8
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #8
F-it.... im just gonna do both.
 

old_blue

15 Year Member
Nov 3, 2003
1,783
282
124
Jun 23, 2009
#9
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #9
nisreo said:
F-it.... im just gonna do both.
Click to expand...

was just going to say the same thing......
 

Strype

Cuthbert catcher
Founding Member
May 11, 1999
61
34
104
Huntsvegas, AL
Jun 23, 2009
#10
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #10
No offense but why would anyone bother with stock gt40p's? How much horsepower did the explorer make with them?
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jun 23, 2009
#11
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #11
GT40 stuff. Even if it made less power, you have that power 100% of the time and it's 100% legal to have and use on the street. You pay for it once and you have it forever unless you break it, as opposed to having to constantly fill a bottle. In the long run, nitrous is a WASTE of money. I honestly can't understand why ANYONE uses the stuff even for a strip only car. Yes it works and yes it's very effective, but in a long term cost viewpoint you could spend 3k on a blower and make the same power and have that power on constantly instead of having to deal with bottles.
 
M

Makdaddymac

New Member
May 28, 2005
323
1
0
orlando
Jun 23, 2009
#12
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #12
if i were to do it all over.

i would just do:
gears first.
intake (performer or something).
and a 100/75 shot.

gears and intake you got a 13second street car. that pulls good everywhere and is reliable.
the wet shot makes you a drag machine putting you in the 12's and !MAYBE! high 11's.

ps.whats the fastest a all stock t-5 5.0 and a 100 shot has ran? do they ever hit the 11's on the juice
 

nisreo

New Member
Jul 22, 2006
178
0
0
Jun 24, 2009
#13
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #13
Strype said:
No offense but why would anyone bother with stock gt40p's? How much horsepower did the explorer make with them?
Click to expand...

Well, I can get the set for $150 so I figure why not. Maybe I should leave my stock heads, get the explorer intake and the juice??

If the heads arent worth a few 10ths Id rather spend the 150 elsewhere. Like I said this motor is just to tool around with for a couple years. Im going crazy driving the escort EVERY day.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jun 24, 2009
#14
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #14
for 150 I would buy the N20 set up and scrounge the JY for a gt40 combo. I boutmy my explorer motor intake to oil pan for less than 200.00
with gears and a gt40 setup I am sure that you will be low 12's for sure
 

nisreo

New Member
Jul 22, 2006
178
0
0
Jun 24, 2009
#15
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #15
Yea 150 is for the heads at my local pick and pull. Another 150 for the explorer intake.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jun 24, 2009
#16
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #16
wow, IMHO one is not very good without the other. I wouldnt waste time/money on just the intake.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Fox Build ideas for the 'Hudson Heap' (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Sep 19, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 27, 2023
MadSquirrelTech
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
Engine Head gasket or what?
  • Foxbody1988
  • Jan 17, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 19, 2020
7991LXnSHO
NEW FOX IMPUT/ADVICE
  • Madness7645
  • Jun 22, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2020
Madness7645
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?