• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Gt 40 topend

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1quik69
  • Start date Start date Dec 2, 2006
1

1quik69

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
38
0
0
Dec 2, 2006
#1
  • Dec 2, 2006
  • #1
Approximately how much hp gain would a mildly ported set of GT40 iron heads with the GT40 u/l manifold, 65mm Tb and 24# injectors and matching MAF give to a stock 95 gt? We are going to stay with the stock gt cam but change the rockers to 1.7's.
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Dec 2, 2006
#2
  • Dec 2, 2006
  • #2
There's several variables in trying to figure it out. What does the mild port job consist of? Just a cartridge roll to remove the roughness, or going in there with a carbide bit and opening the ports up fairly decent? Any bowl work? Figuring your average aluminum headed combo is around 280-320 RWHP, I'd estimate you'd be somewhere closer to the low range of that with the iron GT40s with a cam swap, too.
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Dec 2, 2006
#3
  • Dec 2, 2006
  • #3
i put down 270 with unported heads. im sure with some more dyno time to get a/f ratio dialed in it could put down a few more. i think it would be safe to say with ported heads you could get close to 300.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Dec 2, 2006
#4
  • Dec 2, 2006
  • #4
With no cam or tune I'd say 250 to 260.

Grady
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Dec 2, 2006
#5
  • Dec 2, 2006
  • #5
StangGT1995 said:
There's several variables in trying to figure it out. What does the mild port job consist of? Just a cartridge roll to remove the roughness, or going in there with a carbide bit and opening the ports up fairly decent? Any bowl work? Figuring your average aluminum headed combo is around 280-320 RWHP, I'd estimate you'd be somewhere closer to the low range of that with the iron GT40s with a cam swap, too.
Click to expand...


Not too rack your chain but 320rwhoo? Not average. Average is like 285-290rwhp. gt40's? 260-265rwhp.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Dec 2, 2006
#6
  • Dec 2, 2006
  • #6
final5-0 said:
With no cam or tune I'd say 250 to 260.

Grady
Click to expand...

250 MAXXXXXX with no cam no tune.
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Dec 3, 2006
#7
  • Dec 3, 2006
  • #7
your gonna have a tuff time getting it running with no cam in there
 
1

1quik69

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
38
0
0
Dec 3, 2006
#8
  • Dec 3, 2006
  • #8
I forgot to mention that we are looking at staying with the stock gt cam but going with 1.7 rockers.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Dec 3, 2006
#9
  • Dec 3, 2006
  • #9
Stepping up the rocker ratio is one of those mods that is highly over rated.

Yes ... they give a gain ... no doubt about it.

But it is only a hand full of extra ponies ... very small.

I see that mod as being very similar to the mid pipe.

Sometimes, peeps quickly at first go for a mid pipe change and soon there after, they learn about the advantages with LT's but they've already committed themselves with the shorty pipe.

Going to 1.7 ped rr's (the only choice for oem iron heads) influences peeps rocker decision when they step up to Aluminum heads.

Another thing about the 1.7's is they limit you with cam choice too.

I say if you have plans for higher flowing heads or a cam ..........

DON'T do the 1.7 rr thing

They don't give much extra zip
and
Why buy rockers twice

OH YEAH ... if one does 1.7's
and
then goes with TFS for a choice in heads

They WILL buy rockers twice.

Just a little out loud thinking based upon what I've seen on these boards.

Grady
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Dec 3, 2006
#10
  • Dec 3, 2006
  • #10
urban96 said:
your gonna have a tuff time getting it running with no cam in there
Click to expand...

 

parchisi

New Member
Apr 13, 2006
519
1
0
New Mexico
Dec 3, 2006
#11
  • Dec 3, 2006
  • #11
final5-0 said:
Stepping up the rocker ratio is one of those mods that is highly over rated.

Yes ... they give a gain ... no doubt about it.

But it is only a hand full of extra ponies ... very small.

I see that mod as being very similar to the mid pipe.

Sometimes, peeps quickly at first go for a mid pipe change and soon there after, they learn about the advantages with LT's but they've already committed themselves with the shorty pipe.

Going to 1.7 ped rr's (the only choice for oem iron heads) influences peeps rocker decision when they step up to Aluminum heads.

Another thing about the 1.7's is they limit you with cam choice too.

I say if you have plans for higher flowing heads or a cam ..........

DON'T do the 1.7 rr thing

They don't give much extra zip
and
Why buy rockers twice

OH YEAH ... if one does 1.7's
and
then goes with TFS for a choice in heads

They WILL buy rockers twice.

Just a little out loud thinking based upon what I've seen on these boards.

Grady
Click to expand...

Where's all the smilies???
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
645
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Custom tune?
  • Nostang25
  • Jul 13, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
571
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 17, 2025
FastDriver
D
No start
  • dkrupp79
  • May 31, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
176
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2025
dkrupp79
D
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
214
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
C
Dyno day! # guesses?
  • clayton seiders
  • Aug 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
360
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 16, 2025
Scrapla347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?