• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Gt Aerodynamic Tech

  • Thread starter Thread starter forzalife
  • Start date Start date Dec 16, 2013
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,315
21,496
234
Box behind Walmart
Dec 17, 2013
#21
  • Dec 17, 2013
  • #21
forzalife said:
You dont know what your saying



How can you say lowered mustangs are rice
Click to expand...


Whatever the discussion is in here?... That thing is bad-ass.

Thank You
 

91TwighlightGT

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 8, 2002
1,190
375
124
Missouri
Dec 17, 2013
#22
  • Dec 17, 2013
  • #22
Grabbin' Asphalt said:
Because nascar speeds are not present on public roads, Functional side skirts help with water puddles
Click to expand...

Automakers do not go to great lengths to reduce drag for high speed, they do it for fuel economy. A side skirt is perfectly functional and worthwhile for increasing fuel economy. Unfortunately, having them low enough to be effective also means that they will probably not survive their first encounter with a speed bump, and they will scrape annoyingly as you travel down the road.
 

MikeH686

Mine is only two inches though.
10 Year Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,843
1,753
184
Waldorf, MD
Dec 18, 2013
#23
  • Dec 18, 2013
  • #23
*sniff sniff* did someone say doritos tacos? @84Ttop
 

flstang65

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2007
1,484
135
94
SE Georgia
Dec 18, 2013
#24
  • Dec 18, 2013
  • #24
Cool ranch or nacho cheese taco shell is the real question here.
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Dec 18, 2013
#25
  • Dec 18, 2013
  • #25
All this talk of aerodynamics and my dd is probable the least aero of them all

 
Reactions: elarm1

elarm1

10 Year Member
Dec 17, 2010
1,428
652
154
N.Va
Dec 18, 2013
#26
  • Dec 18, 2013
  • #26
She sure is purty^^!!
 
Reactions: madspeed

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Dec 18, 2013
#27
  • Dec 18, 2013
  • #27
madspeed said:
All this talk of aerodynamics and my dd is probable the least aero of them all

Click to expand...
I just threw up my lunch in my mouth and those doritos tacos aren't as good going the other direction
 
Reactions: A5literMan, krazedstang and elarm1

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Dec 18, 2013
#28
  • Dec 18, 2013
  • #28
Welk, they are known as Turbo Bricks for the non aerodynamics!
 

Grabbin' Asphalt

10 Year Member
Jun 10, 2013
2,029
310
124
Atlanta, Ga
Dec 18, 2013
#29
  • Dec 18, 2013
  • #29
84Ttop said:
I just threw up my lunch in my mouth and those doritos tacos aren't as good going the other direction
Click to expand...


Had some today and they were Amazing, ...carry on
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Dec 18, 2013
#30
  • Dec 18, 2013
  • #30
im sure you got rid of them by now
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,315
21,496
234
Box behind Walmart
Dec 18, 2013
#31
  • Dec 18, 2013
  • #31
It's no less aero than an Aero.
 
J

JohnnyGMachine

Member
Jun 19, 2004
123
5
19
Easton, Pa
Dec 26, 2013
#32
  • Dec 26, 2013
  • #32
91TwighlightGT said:
Automakers do not go to great lengths to reduce drag for high speed, they do it for fuel economy.....
Click to expand...
Generally speeaking no - I can agree with that especially when it comes to the Fox Body Mustang in which we are discussing here. HOWEVER - Ford DID do extensive high speed wind tunnel testing and aero improvements for the current 2013-2014 Shelby GT500 to achieve the 200+ mph speeds. It is an exception especially with Ford but many european automakers especially those who manufacture exotics do high speed aero testing and improvements.
*
Basically the fox body Mustang is a brick. Don't forget though at the time when it was first out it was FAR more aerodynamic than a Mustang II or any other Mustang predecessors. I believe the rear spoilers on the LX and GT do actually offer aero improvements for cleaner air flow off the rear of the car...a little more so with the GT. They do work. The front GT/Cobra Fascias do create more down force than the LX nose. I'd say the GT rear skirts trap air if anything at the back - creating a cutout and a functional rear diffuser would help! I imagine a good drop in ride height greatly improves these cars aerodynamically as well.
Just my 2 cents
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,997
2,984
194
Middle of Maine
Dec 26, 2013
#33
  • Dec 26, 2013
  • #33
On a stock GT at speeds of 140 and up, the front end has more down force than the rear. Saleen had some high speed photos that show the rear of the car lifting at speeds above 140, thus the whale-tail rear wing on the Saleen version of the Fox Mustang.
 

91TwighlightGT

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 8, 2002
1,190
375
124
Missouri
Dec 27, 2013
#34
  • Dec 27, 2013
  • #34
JohnnyGMachine said:
Generally speeaking no - I can agree with that especially when it comes to the Fox Body Mustang in which we are discussing here. HOWEVER - Ford DID do extensive high speed wind tunnel testing and aero improvements for the current 2013-2014 Shelby GT500 to achieve the 200+ mph speeds. It is an exception especially with Ford but many european automakers especially those who manufacture exotics do high speed aero testing and improvements.
*
Basically the fox body Mustang is a brick. Don't forget though at the time when it was first out it was FAR more aerodynamic than a Mustang II or any other Mustang predecessors. I believe the rear spoilers on the LX and GT do actually offer aero improvements for cleaner air flow off the rear of the car...a little more so with the GT. They do work. The front GT/Cobra Fascias do create more down force than the LX nose. I'd say the GT rear skirts trap air if anything at the back - creating a cutout and a functional rear diffuser would help! I imagine a good drop in ride height greatly improves these cars aerodynamically as well.
Just my 2 cents
Click to expand...


We pretty much agree. The GT500 is a special case car built with a specific goal in mind, but the average production car only goes to the wind tunnel for fuel economy and cooling efficiency testing. My original point was simply that the cars do not need to be going Nascar speeds to benefit from better aero efficiency.

I suppose that the LX spoiler or perhaps the GT wing could allow for a cleaner flow off the rear of the car, but my only issue is that the flow has already separated at that point. My feeling is that probably the GT wing causes some minimal drag and the LX spoiler does nothing significant.

The only way I can really see the Fox Mustang being better in this department would be to slope the roof far more gradually. It just isn't really possible with the design of the car.

Lower ride height would certainly be more helpful, these cars are very aerodynamically dirty underneath so keeping as much air from under the car as possible would be the best.
 

91TwighlightGT

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 8, 2002
1,190
375
124
Missouri
Dec 27, 2013
#35
  • Dec 27, 2013
  • #35
Bullitt347 said:
On a stock GT at speeds of 140 and up, the front end has more down force than the rear. Saleen had some high speed photos that show the rear of the car lifting at speeds above 140, thus the whale-tail rear wing on the Saleen version of the Fox Mustang.
Click to expand...

To be clear, there probably isn't any true downforce at all. The whole car probably generates a lot of lift in stock form. I could see the rear of the GT having a lot of lift at the rear due to the rear bumper design. The engineers would hang their heads in shame in the modern world.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

O
Paint and Body Has anyone put 1990 GT Hatch body kit on a 1989 GT Convertible
  • obeone66
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
151
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 8, 2025
General karthief
D
Progress Thread Calypso Green 92 LX Hatchback
  • Dakar09
  • May 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
515
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 24, 2026
AeroCoupe
S
Fox Another try for the European guy to get his first Fox
  • Schargedfox
  • Aug 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
295
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 4, 2026
DadLife0724
G
Hello and Instrument Wiring
  • GT Jon
  • Jul 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
130
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 6, 2026
Mustang5L5
K
Fox body swapped sn95
  • Konstang
  • Apr 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
637
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2025
95BlueStallion
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?