• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

gt40X heads.. or gt40P?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dstang01
  • Start date Start date Dec 27, 2007
D

dstang01

Member
Sep 22, 2005
170
0
16
Vancouver, BC
Dec 27, 2007
#1
  • Dec 27, 2007
  • #1
What can you guys tell me about the gt40x aluminums? Ive done some searching but cant come up with concrete info. Would these be ideal for a mild (but torquey) street setup, or would I be better of with gt40P irons? I know trickflows, edelbrocks and afrs are much more advanced than the ford gt40 series, but moneys the limiting factor here. For a daily driven street combo (consisting of the stock HO cam with 1.7s, and a cobra intake) would you recommend the X's or the P's and why?
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Dec 27, 2007
#2
  • Dec 27, 2007
  • #2
the X's are superior to the p's in almost every way, they are half the weight, flow more, but they also cost a LOT more.
for the money you will spend on X heads you could get into a set of TW's.
If money is truly you deciding factor then I would stick with a set of gt40's or gt40'ps. with either head, a cobra intake and a stock cam you could easily gain at least 60hp and still retain good driveability and gas mileage.
 

onestripevert

Member
Nov 17, 2007
54
0
6
knxville, tn
Dec 27, 2007
#3
  • Dec 27, 2007
  • #3
if those are your only choices id go with the X
the P's have strait plugs i believe, and require specialty headers

patriot ( MY BAD )
 

wythors

Get off my lawn!!!
Founding Member
May 17, 2000
2,277
35
69
C Addle
Dec 27, 2007
#4
  • Dec 27, 2007
  • #4
I have the GT-40 X303's and you can check the rest of my set-up in my sig. That combo put down 257 rwhp and 295 lb/ft of torque through a stock AOD. I've now switched to a t-5 and will have it back on the dyno in late January for new numbers. I love the power and driveabillity of my car and would recommend the GT-40X's highly.
 
D

dstang01

Member
Sep 22, 2005
170
0
16
Vancouver, BC
Dec 27, 2007
#5
  • Dec 27, 2007
  • #5
Thanks for your comments guys, the reason Im comparing gt40Ps to the gt40Xs is because I was planning to use junkyard Ps for my setup, but I was recently offered a set of good condition used Xs for a very resonable price.. sure I could get used Ps for cheaper, but then you can never have the security with a junkyard head.. and if you want to get it ported and get nicer springs (a must) then you will probably exceed the cost of the nice Xs and still have a heavy iron head that flows equal to the aluminums.

Good flow stock.. lighter over the front end.. nice valves/springs/etc.. Im thinkin ill go with the Xs
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Dec 27, 2007
#6
  • Dec 27, 2007
  • #6
If I had to choose, I'd get the X heads over the P. Aluminum, so you'll save weight, and they'll flow better. Depends on the price though.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Dec 28, 2007
#7
  • Dec 28, 2007
  • #7
if you were offered x's at a decent price I'd go that route.
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Dec 28, 2007
#8
  • Dec 28, 2007
  • #8
i would also go with the X heads if i could. They will save you weight where you need it and they do flow better than the P heads. They are a proven 270-280 rwhp head time and time again! They are well built too...good for street use!
 

TC93

Well-Known Member
Sep 11, 2000
2,075
1
57
Ellerslie GA 31807
Dec 28, 2007
#9
  • Dec 28, 2007
  • #9
Need to factor the machine work for the junk yard P's in, not to mention better springs. With the cost of the P's , machine work (cleaning, valve job & deck surfacing) and new springs, "How much cheaper would they really be compared to the x's?
 
D

DocZG

New Member
Jun 7, 2006
72
0
0
San Antonio, Texas
Dec 28, 2007
#10
  • Dec 28, 2007
  • #10
not to mention you can also port the Xs later on, P have little room for porting from what i understand
 
D

dstang01

Member
Sep 22, 2005
170
0
16
Vancouver, BC
Dec 31, 2007
#11
  • Dec 31, 2007
  • #11
Thanks guys, these are all points that I have considered, but its reassuring to hear you guys make the same points I'm definately going with the Xs, Im looking for 260-280 streetable rwhp, so I think this head is a happy medium between junkyard Ps and high dollar tfs/afr/edels
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
981
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Newbie looking for budget 5.0 and suspension advice
  • stillwater79
  • Jan 19, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
805
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 3, 2024
AeroCoupe
2
Bought an engine for my project
  • 2stroke1971
  • Jul 7, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2024
limp
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?