• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2007 - 2014 Shelby GT500 Tech

GT500 Supercharger impressions

  • Thread starter Thread starter MK2_GT
  • Start date Start date Aug 7, 2006
M

MK2_GT

New Member
May 1, 2006
23
0
0
Aug 7, 2006
#1
  • Aug 7, 2006
  • #1
GT500 Supercharger first impressions

When I first got the car, It seemed a bit sluggish at times. Now that I ahve learned more about the car, it really flies . The Super Charger is set to really engage high in the RPM band. At 5000 RPM , it really kicks in. The more I learn about boosting in this particular car the faster it gets.
 

RandyB

New Member
Feb 20, 2004
307
0
0
Tx.
Aug 9, 2006
#2
  • Aug 9, 2006
  • #2
MK2_GT said:
When I first got the car, It seemed a bit sluggish at times. Now that I ahve learned more about the car, it really flies . The Super Charger is set to really engage high in the RPM band. At 5000 RPM , it really kicks in. The more I learn about boosting in this particular car the faster it gets.
Click to expand...

Thanks for posting that - I enjoyed reading about your GT500. I was able to read it before you edited it. I have noticed similar characteristics with my Roushcharged '06 GT. The supercharger whine is intoxicating.

View attachment 449547
 

Racer X

Founding Member
Apr 19, 2000
405
0
0
Aug 9, 2006
#3
  • Aug 9, 2006
  • #3
Sounds like as time goes on the cars will get quicker. Thats cool. I ran one in my Stang.... lets just say it wasnt even in the same Zip code. But Im sure modded it will be a different story.
 

almostblown

New Member
Dec 16, 2005
109
0
0
Aug 10, 2006
#4
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #4
I dont care what form of forced induction it comes in, it sounds soooo awesome. Centrifugal, roots, twin screw, hybrid, turbo, you name it, theyre head turners.

Havent seen (nonetheless heard) a Shelby yet around here, but I cant wait.

I took a buddy of mine for a ride in the blown Ranger tonight, he could not get over the whine of the Eaton.

Which blower is Roush using in the Mustangs?
 
M

MK2_GT

New Member
May 1, 2006
23
0
0
Aug 10, 2006
#5
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #5
Randy, the Roush looks sweet!
 

RandyB

New Member
Feb 20, 2004
307
0
0
Tx.
Aug 10, 2006
#6
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #6
MK2_GT said:
Randy, the Roush looks sweet!
Click to expand...

Thanks! I substituted some GT500 intercooler system parts in my install, such as the coolant tank (visible on top) , lower radiator w/bracket, pump w/bracket and pre-formed hoses, so mine is sort of a hybrid. I did it for aesthetics mainly, and to avoid drilling any holes in my car.

I really like the GT500 - Ford did a great job despite the weight of the car. I want the brakes for mine!

almostblown said:
Which blower is Roush using in the Mustangs?
Click to expand...

Roush uses the Eaton M90, so it produces the same signature whine as the '03/'04 Cobra and '07 Shelby, although it is a bit smaller than both.
 
3

310stanger

New Member
Aug 15, 2006
170
1
0
Aug 16, 2006
#7
  • Aug 16, 2006
  • #7
i thought the roush blower was bigger then a m90? i thought it was the 112? that kit makes really impressive power considering that blowers size.
 

almostblown

New Member
Dec 16, 2005
109
0
0
Aug 21, 2006
#8
  • Aug 21, 2006
  • #8
Ahh, I see. Saleen used to use the M90 as well.
 

RandyB

New Member
Feb 20, 2004
307
0
0
Tx.
Aug 22, 2006
#9
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #9
310stanger said:
i thought the roush blower was bigger then a m90? i thought it was the 112? that kit makes really impressive power considering that blowers size.
Click to expand...

MM&FF just tested a Roush Stage 3 car and got 391 rwhp. The little blower that could!
 

chuckdoc

Member
Aug 17, 2006
66
0
6
Aug 24, 2006
#10
  • Aug 24, 2006
  • #10
question for mk2

When does it feel like the blower is kicking in? Do you have to rap it out before you notice it?

I like the GT500 setup, but in some ways I feel a twin-screw would have been a better choice, like the Ford GT has. From what I read it allows more power in across the entire band instead of a lag effect.

But I don't own either, yet

Chuck
 

almostblown

New Member
Dec 16, 2005
109
0
0
Aug 24, 2006
#11
  • Aug 24, 2006
  • #11
Being a roots type blower, itll build boost right from the bottom. If its not hitting hard from the bottom, then Im sure Ford has the motor choked up somewhere in the tuning to help driveability and reliability.

Disclaimer: I know nothing.
 
3

310stanger

New Member
Aug 15, 2006
170
1
0
Aug 25, 2006
#12
  • Aug 25, 2006
  • #12
there should be absolutely no lag at all from the blower itself. any rise in power at any part of the curve is entirely reliant on head flow at a certain lift and the cams used. regardless of whether its twin screw or roots the operate in a generally same principal. a centrifugal on the other hand builds boost as the rpms rise.
 
J

jimbo68289

New Member
Aug 20, 2002
3
0
0
Glassboro NJ
Sep 5, 2006
#13
  • Sep 5, 2006
  • #13
ford has in program of gt500 50 start-ups/drive cycles.
So engine has time to brake in before full
boost.
just did p.d.i. inspection on 8/31/06
had no boost at first entil driving for some
miles seemed weak .
call ford an they stated that in is in the program not to full boost entile proper
time has passted and certine drive cycles are meet. just thaught might like to hear from ford tech.
 

Pig

New Member
Sep 27, 2002
35
0
0
North ATL, GA
Sep 11, 2006
#14
  • Sep 11, 2006
  • #14
jimbo68289 said:
ford has in program of gt500 50 start-ups/drive cycles.
So engine has time to brake in before full
boost.
just did p.d.i. inspection on 8/31/06
had no boost at first entil driving for some
miles seemed weak .
call ford an they stated that in is in the program not to full boost entile proper
time has passted and certine drive cycles are meet. just thaught might like to hear from ford tech.
Click to expand...

Any idea what the length of that time/drive cycle is?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
908
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
722
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Forced Induction Total Timing under boost
  • Dontknowchit
  • Aug 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
326
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 28, 2025
Dontknowchit
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
796
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
G
New Owner: Very Clean 1991 GT Convertible. All original with 21k original Miles. How to make it better?
  • gvanginkel403
  • Oct 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2025
Jarhead67
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2007 - 2014 Shelby GT500 Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?