• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Guys, talk me into a Turbo / or Turbos!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter 69clark
  • Start date Start date Oct 12, 2006

69clark

Founding Member
Sep 25, 2002
731
7
18
Ravena, NY
Oct 12, 2006
#1
  • Oct 12, 2006
  • #1
Well, I don't know what sparked this interest but I have been thinking about going to a turbo or twin turbo setup on my car instead of the supercharger. It would be a good project for this winter. What do you guys think? I have a few questions and want to know which way I should go.

1. Should I stay SC or go to a turbo setup?

2. If I go turbo what turbo should a look at getting, I don't know much about what is out there? It should be stated that I already have the intercooler in place, I have extra tubing, couplers, and t clamps so I think that I would be looking at building my own kit instead of spending the money on a pre fabed kit. What do you think as far as that goes?

3. Give me some pros and cons of going turbo.

4. Finally should I go single or twin turbo? pros and cons of both!

Thanks guys and any help is appreciated!:SNSign:
 

Bosko5.0

Active Member
May 18, 2006
1,067
0
37
longwood, FL
Oct 12, 2006
#2
  • Oct 12, 2006
  • #2
con: turbo lag pro:twin turbo should fix turbo lag
sc turbo its up to you
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Oct 12, 2006
#3
  • Oct 12, 2006
  • #3
Id stay with the SC more reliable + more room under the hood... ... but if you got cash... turbo + the SC
 

reddy351

10 Year Member
Jun 13, 2006
560
12
38
Columbus, Ohio
Oct 12, 2006
#4
  • Oct 12, 2006
  • #4
I vote turbo x 2. Just makes sense. One for each cyl bank. Turbo's use less parasitic drag than a blower to make power. I would think a couple of T3's would to the trick. Does someone make headers for that? I know that most guys use shorties on opposite cyl banks. I'm not sure I like that method.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Must...014QQitemZ330036738557QQrdZ1QQsspagenameZWDVW

That might get you started.
 

AznStanger3v

Active Member
Aug 11, 2003
2,026
0
47
Northern VA
Oct 12, 2006
#5
  • Oct 12, 2006
  • #5
get a VG turbo. full boost all the time... almost
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Oct 13, 2006
#6
  • Oct 13, 2006
  • #6
yeah--the newer turbos essentially get rid of lag. problem is they're expensive (for po' college boys like me).

turbo=free power from exhaust, cool sound, lots of hp and torque
 

badstang123

New Member
Jan 17, 2006
397
0
0
Santa Clarita, CA
Oct 13, 2006
#7
  • Oct 13, 2006
  • #7
reddy351 said:
I vote turbo x 2. Just makes sense. One for each cyl bank. Turbo's use less parasitic drag than a blower to make power. I would think a couple of T3's would to the trick. Does someone make headers for that? I know that most guys use shorties on opposite cyl banks. I'm not sure I like that method.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Must...014QQitemZ330036738557QQrdZ1QQsspagenameZWDVW

That might get you started.
Click to expand...

That's a good find. I don't know, but that seems pretty cheap to me Makes me want to buy it right now and start fabbing up
 

Mustangless

Member
Jun 27, 2003
903
1
18
home
Oct 13, 2006
#8
  • Oct 13, 2006
  • #8
On my car, it drives like a stock car. But when the rpms get higher it starts moving. I don't have that mustang sound, but instead you get another nice sound. I still have an open dp, but it should sound better when I get the exhaust ran.

If you search on turbomustangs.com you can see lots of peoples builds. Most people go with a master power t70 because they are cheaper and are good. I don't know if that will be good for you though.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Oct 13, 2006
#9
  • Oct 13, 2006
  • #9
aren't you selling your car?

that ebay price is great, but it is so low it makes me wonder why ...
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Oct 13, 2006
#10
  • Oct 13, 2006
  • #10
why do all the work if your trying to sell the car? stick with the SC
 

95cobraguy

Member
Dec 23, 2005
637
11
19
Concord, NC by way of LI, NY
Oct 13, 2006
#11
  • Oct 13, 2006
  • #11
why put a turbo on when u just went through all the work of putting the blower on?
 

69clark

Founding Member
Sep 25, 2002
731
7
18
Ravena, NY
Oct 13, 2006
#12
  • Oct 13, 2006
  • #12
Blackvert - No it was joke that I just haven't changed yet

95cobraguy - I didn't, I have always had this supercharger on the car. The work I just did was a H/C/I and built bottom end. Seems to me it is a perfect time to put on a turbo.
 

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
Oct 13, 2006
#13
  • Oct 13, 2006
  • #13
It will be ****ing badass.


How much more of a reason do you need?

lol
 

Dan95-5.0

Active Member
Jun 14, 2003
1,110
0
36
Manitoba, Canada
Oct 13, 2006
#14
  • Oct 13, 2006
  • #14
the only thing that sucks about a turbo is that you completly lose that great mustang sound. plus it can be super quiet unless you run a vented wastegate but then that would sound like a really big exhaust leak a some rpms.

turbo lag is pretty much non existant now a days as long as you pick up the right sized turbo for your combo

if i already ha a blower already, i would just stick with that. what is the reason to switch? what are your full and final plans for the car?
 

illwood

Member
Apr 3, 2004
636
1
19
Worcester, MA
Oct 13, 2006
#15
  • Oct 13, 2006
  • #15
Adam95GT said:
Id stay with the SC more reliable
Click to expand...
How do you figure? There are plenty of reliable turbos out there. The trouble is when people don't know what they're doing when they put a turbo on a car. Then it gets problematic.

If you are seriously thinking about it, you should buy Maximum Boost by Corky Bell.

It's a good overview and tells you alot of what you need to know to plan a turbo system.
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
Massachusetts
Oct 13, 2006
#16
  • Oct 13, 2006
  • #16
Go turbo if you have the time and money. Build the kit yourself if you have the time..

And go single, no need for twins.
 

TurboSnake95

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
1,402
0
36
Spanaway, Washington
Oct 14, 2006
#17
  • Oct 14, 2006
  • #17
The Dark Side has my vote, but just use a single, alot less piping.
 

OrangeMustangGt

Founding Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,976
0
36
Cape Cod, MA
Oct 14, 2006
#18
  • Oct 14, 2006
  • #18
go turbo.

Lag isnt a problem, and a turbo isnt more unreliable than a blower...cars come with them from the factory.

Heres the deal: A turbo will have you at full boost by 3,000rpm and stay there.......
A turbo takes away less power to make power, leaving you with more output.
You can probably use your intercooler, just need a BOV.

Also, definatly go big single....get a new one. If you go twins it just ends up being more work.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Oct 14, 2006
#19
  • Oct 14, 2006
  • #19
turbos are awesome, just make sure you get a good wastegate and get a good tune. those are usually the causes of blown head gasgets
 

millhouse

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
1,985
0
46
Simpsonville, SC
Oct 14, 2006
#20
  • Oct 14, 2006
  • #20
TurboSnake95 said:
The Dark Side has my vote, but just use a single, alot less piping.
Click to expand...

Not as much as you would think. A single has more a complex hotside than a twin setup...but a twin setup allowys you to still run a true dual exhaust. The reason I fabriacted my twin setup is because it was easier than a single. Merging the hotside on a single can be tricky...and is very crucial, while merging the coldside on the twins is cake.

As far as the mustang sound goes...mine sure as hell still has it. The single setups end up loosing it a bit as you merge two headers into one...and then back out to two.

In the end though either setup you wont regret. It wont be cheap however...and you might as well start saving for a dart block right now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
839
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
655
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
D
Electric turbo
  • Doug76
  • Mar 8, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
353
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 11, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?