• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Guys with widebands... what is your cruising AF ratio?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Killercanary
  • Start date Start date Jul 29, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Jul 29, 2008
#1
  • Jul 29, 2008
  • #1
I just took my car on a trip that was mostly highway and I got HORRIBLE mileage. I got 13mpg over a 100 mile trip. I've since leaned it out to see if I can get better MPG out of it. Since I run a stand alone I have no idea what AF ratio guys with factory EEC's see when just cruising down the highway. I just wanted to see what other guys see.
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Jul 29, 2008
#2
  • Jul 29, 2008
  • #2
14.7
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Jul 29, 2008
#3
  • Jul 29, 2008
  • #3
Hmmm... I'm already out to 15.5-16.5:1. This is at little to no load though too with under 10% throttle. I wonder what else I can do to get the MPG up. I used to get 20mpg on the highway with my eec tuner/t4mo setup. I wonder if I need to feed in a lot more timing in the cruising rpm's.
 

gcomfx.com

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,690
0
56
Republic, MO
Jul 29, 2008
#4
  • Jul 29, 2008
  • #4
14.7 here too.
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Jul 29, 2008
#5
  • Jul 29, 2008
  • #5
I've used about every consumer wideband out there across quite a few cars, on a properly tuned car I see the AFR hover around 14.7-14.9 +- about .5 AFR as the narrowband O2s cycle.

On my list of things to try is targeting AFR in the 16s at cruise and maxxing out the spark. I saw a couple mpg increase by running upper 40s spark at cruise.

Wes
 

Mustangless

Member
Jun 27, 2003
903
1
18
home
Jul 29, 2008
#6
  • Jul 29, 2008
  • #6
my afr is all over the place at cruise. High 13s to mid 15s.
 

Trbofox

Member
Oct 26, 2004
227
18
19
Erie,Pa.
Jul 29, 2008
#7
  • Jul 29, 2008
  • #7
14.7, and 21 mpg highway.
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Jul 29, 2008
#8
  • Jul 29, 2008
  • #8
Not WB but when I twEECed it I got 14.64 on my car...
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jul 29, 2008
#9
  • Jul 29, 2008
  • #9
Usually between 14.x and 15.x
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Jul 29, 2008
#10
  • Jul 29, 2008
  • #10


Here's a snippet of a datalog from today at steady cruise and a graph. Please ignore the blank parameters in the log, we are working on some new datalogging features for BE.

This is off an Innovate LC1 sensor in my car. The sensor has about 4,000 miles on it since calibration.

14.72632653 AVERAGE LAMBSE
14.68015694 AVERAGE AFR

Source Datalog: http://www.72mach1.com/research/AFRvsLAMBSE.xls

Hope this helps,
Wes
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 29, 2008
#11
  • Jul 29, 2008
  • #11
Been so long since I had my display hooked up

Level stretch of highway and very light load with just enough skinny
pedal to keep steady highway speeds

I wanna say I see mostly 15's and an occasional 16 will blink across

Grady
 

95opal

5 Year Member
Nov 16, 2004
449
20
39
Aug 4, 2008
#12
  • Aug 4, 2008
  • #12
Grn92LX said:
Usually between 14.x and 15.x
Click to expand...

Ditto!
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Aug 4, 2008
#13
  • Aug 4, 2008
  • #13
Man this sucks. I left my house with 5/8th of a tank of fuel, drove and hour to the track and made 5 passes, then drove and hour home with only 1/8th of a tank left. The odometer showed that I went exactly 200 miles on that tank and had used 7/8th of a tank of fuel. My wideband shows my cruising AF to be between 15.5-16.5. I had yeahloh95 in the car with me trying to get the tune even better and he can attest to how easy I was driving the car...

I'm going to try throwing a bunch of timing at it during light load and see if that helps, I've read that it should. I also have a timing/ignition issue that needs fixed first as the car was breaking up under full load around 5000rpms which didn't make for very good times.
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Aug 4, 2008
#14
  • Aug 4, 2008
  • #14
Yeah the ignition and injector timing is really all that's left to try at that point. I would imagine that if you're timing the injectors too early, you'll be losing raw fuel through the exhuast valves.

Or perhaps the engine is too cool? Or you just need more break-in on the new bottom end?

For anyone not forcing open loop or some kinf of hack, they will pretty much see stoich since the computer will alter the PWM to compensate for anything else that's wrong with it. It doesn't know how to adjust injector timing though. You have to know where to time it with your cam profile.
 

Redsnk95

Founding Member
Feb 3, 2002
2,243
1
0
Houston, TX
Aug 5, 2008
#15
  • Aug 5, 2008
  • #15
Paul you are going to need a lot of timing at the low load areas, 40+ degrees is the light load areas to help get that gas mileage back up. Did you use the AEM supplied 94/95 tune? The timing table should be perfect for you with some modifications in the WOT/High load areas.
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Aug 5, 2008
#16
  • Aug 5, 2008
  • #16
Redsnk95 said:
Paul you are going to need a lot of timing at the low load areas, 40+ degrees is the light load areas to help get that gas mileage back up. Did you use the AEM supplied 94/95 tune? The timing table should be perfect for you with some modifications in the WOT/High load areas.
Click to expand...

I agree on the 40+ spark at light cruise. I run 45* on my car and can still go a bit higher.

Also you mentioned the ignition system could potentially have a fault, seems like that would give you some grief as well if the coil is overheating or a shoddy ground getting hot? Just throwing out ideerz.

Wes
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 5, 2008
#17
  • Aug 5, 2008
  • #17
I just thought about something that makes my above post a bit misleading

I forgot I was running forced Open Loop idle for a long, long time

At very light loads ... like at a cruise down the highway .........

It is quite possible I could have been in OL so that would have skewed
my info a bit as the O2's would have been out of the picture with a
condition such as that.

Grady
 

Mustangless

Member
Jun 27, 2003
903
1
18
home
Sep 4, 2008
#18
  • Sep 4, 2008
  • #18


Seems as if my wideband is saying I am rich.
 

millhouse

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
1,985
0
46
Simpsonville, SC
Sep 5, 2008
#19
  • Sep 5, 2008
  • #19
Are you running some type of over-run fuel cut? To know if you are or are not, get on the happy pedal a bit and let off quickly to get into the low load/high vacuum areas of your tune. The fuel should shut off and you should get a dead lean reading on your 02 sensor. You need to turn it on if it’s not already as it can save a TON of fuel even on a Sunday drive.
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Sep 8, 2008
#20
  • Sep 8, 2008
  • #20
He's got an auto which cuts fuel a bit later than a stick (the DFSO tuning is less aggressive stock).

Brett, I'd try to verify with a second wideband just to be sure - sensors tend to get lazy and drift as they age before they go out. I keep a couple on hand for that very reason.

Also, did you get that graph from #s out of Innovate software or out of your twEECer datalog?

Wes
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Who the hell puts the wrong spark plugs in a 3.8L?
  • snowstang
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
447
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 3, 2026
LILCBRA
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
222
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
44
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Monday at 1:31 AM
X-cam34
X
What's your tow rig?
  • LILCBRA
  • May 31, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
146
Other Auto Tech May 31, 2026
LILCBRA
A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
469
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?