• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

H/C/I 5.0 vs H/C LT1....what'll happen?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TX_Outlaw93
  • Start date Start date Oct 27, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Oct 28, 2006
#21
  • Oct 28, 2006
  • #21
It's like this, a stock LT1 is a 275hp and 320tq car, gets it torque at 2000rpm and has a flat powerband until about mid 5K's. They nearly put thier rated HP/TQ to the wheels because they were underrated. A stock 5.0 will put less than 200hp to the tire. Unless you have a real nice agressive H/C/I, your going to have a real tough time without a poweradder. Of course, there are other factors besides the engine that can determine the race.
 
T

TX_Outlaw93

New Member
Oct 20, 2006
0
0
0
Palmview, TX
Oct 29, 2006
#22
  • Oct 29, 2006
  • #22
how much lighter are 5.0 stangs compared to LT1 cars? if an f-body can get down to 3200-3400 lbs then that is a feat, but most guys pull carpets, seats, bumper supports, a/c, and some other small things. and replacing the k-member and a-arms also offer lots of weight reduction.

also someone mentioned that 5.0's will take an LT1 out of the hole and then run out of steam. what are some usual 60ft's that you guys see along with 1/8mi times? my car (just for comparison)with longtubes, stall, and slicks went 13.0x@103-105 a few times with a 1.7x60ft and 8.2x@84mph in the 1/8th.
 

90_Red_LX

Member
Sep 29, 2003
668
5
19
Asheboro, NC
Oct 29, 2006
#23
  • Oct 29, 2006
  • #23
TX_Outlaw93 said:
how much lighter are 5.0 stangs compared to LT1 cars? if an f-body can get down to 3200-3400 lbs then that is a feat, but most guys pull carpets, seats, bumper supports, a/c, and some other small things. and replacing the k-member and a-arms also offer lots of weight reduction.

also someone mentioned that 5.0's will take an LT1 out of the hole and then run out of steam. what are some usual 60ft's that you guys see along with 1/8mi times? my car (just for comparison)with longtubes, stall, and slicks went 13.0x@103-105 a few times with a 1.7x60ft and 8.2x@84mph in the 1/8th.
Click to expand...

My car ran a 1.90 60' with mods in sig. All season performance tires (falken 512s 245/50/16) and nothing in the suspension has been touched. I plan on getting some SFC's shortly though.

Mac Cat-back
VRS o/r x-pipe
Mac shorty headers
Moroso CAI
14* timing
Pro 5.0
3-core radiator
3.73's
Edelbrock RPM intake
70mmm MAF
65mm TB and egr spacer
 

poneypower89

Now everyone in the world will know I wanna bang t
Dec 6, 2004
0
3
28
Indianapolis, Indiana
Oct 29, 2006
#24
  • Oct 29, 2006
  • #24
TX_Outlaw... WTF DUDE???? You got your answer! The lt1/ls1 pushrod is far superior to our 5.0! Now go away!





























































 

ill advised

Member
Apr 29, 2003
656
10
19
West L.A.
Oct 29, 2006
#25
  • Oct 29, 2006
  • #25
poneypower89 said:
a BASIC H/C/I 5.0 will more than likely lose to a H/C lt1.
Click to expand...
I agree.

In general, the range of h/c/i setups 5.0 guys are running is just too large to even try to figure it out.
 

Bad92GT

The 5 Minute Plan Man
Jun 10, 2004
492
0
0
SC
Oct 29, 2006
#26
  • Oct 29, 2006
  • #26
310stanger said:
id say itd be a drivers race myself. the acronym h/c/i with the 5.0 is a very broad one. theres a lot of people who use close to stock parts and say their car has h/c/i. imho, you dont have a true head cam intake until you have good aftermarket heads like trickflow, afr, edelbrock. the 4th gen fbody is heavy and the fox is a bit lighter. if the fox has been ligtened more and the driver can drive evan smith style, you risk gettin whooped. if its a h/c/i car and the guy cant drive, its a gt vert with auto etc then the fbody should win. the lt1 stock is a much hotter engine then the 5.0 ho and it has 48 cubes going for it. like previously stated they are heavy cars though. not to mention the 8.8 in the fox can take way more abuse the the 7.5 10 bolt in the fbody can.
Click to expand...

not so much true on the rear end.. im LOW 12's.. stock SS 10 bolt.. been rebuilt a time or two.. but.. im there
 
3

310stanger

New Member
Aug 15, 2006
170
1
0
Oct 29, 2006
#27
  • Oct 29, 2006
  • #27
i said the 8.8 is a bunch stronger which it is. that 10 bolt is capable of going 12s but its not recommended and they have been known to break under 12 second power with sticky tires.
 

Bad92GT

The 5 Minute Plan Man
Jun 10, 2004
492
0
0
SC
Oct 29, 2006
#28
  • Oct 29, 2006
  • #28
310stanger said:
i said the 8.8 is a bunch stronger which it is. that 10 bolt is capable of going 12s but its not recommended and they have been known to break under 12 second power with sticky tires.
Click to expand...

well im bogging.. running 12.3s.. around there.. still bogging out the hole with a ok 60 ft.. but mines holding on.. lol i'd like to try and throw a 8.8 in one of these oneday
 
1

1SLO306

My 97 GTP owns you ALL!
Mar 31, 2005
904
1
17
Muhlenberg, ky
Oct 31, 2006
#29
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #29
h/c/i 5.0 will normally lay aroung 290-320 depending on how well ur combo works out. I know the ls1 is better but my buddy layed 438 with afr 205 heads with every upgrade with them and a custom cam from comp cams. i figure a h/c lt1 will lay close to close to 400 if the combo is right.

The next 5.0 i get im going to work on the suspension mods cause a basicly stock 5.0 with all the suspension mods will get close to the 12's. and then once u get h/c/i u will be able to hook a lil and should put u a lil close to 11's. i brought up the suspension mods cause the camaro/firebirds have and awesome setup and hook at the track.


man i just went on and on sorry LOL
 

302RollinHard

New Member
Sep 26, 2005
0
0
0
Columbus, OH
Oct 31, 2006
#30
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #30
I think if you are gonna compare the two, it should be apples to apples. LT1 with H/C vs 351W w/ H/C
In the end there is no replacement for displacement.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
141
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
ejscarfo
E
Progress Thread 1993 LX Hatch Progress
  • Mac131
  • Aug 24, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
210
Views
12K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 15, 2026
Mac131
W
Resolved Loss of Horsepower After Base Idle Reset??
  • WTW
  • Aug 12, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 13, 2023
WTW
W
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
89 5.0, Trick flow stage 1 h/c/i, Megasquirt pnp novice needs help
  • atey950
  • May 1, 2020
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
4
Views
2K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 2, 2020
atey950
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?