• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

h/c/i combo

  • Thread starter Thread starter ponypowa2
  • Start date Start date Nov 29, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
P

ponypowa2

New Member
May 17, 2004
228
0
0
Destin, FL
Nov 29, 2004
#1
  • Nov 29, 2004
  • #1
Hi all, I have another question Is it possible to get in 400hp range with a good h/c/i setup and tune? I have the article which shows 400hp on a carbed 5 liter, and wanted to make sure I can do that with this engine... If so what is a good setup (planned on afr heads and custom cam)...
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Nov 29, 2004
#2
  • Nov 29, 2004
  • #2
350+ is possible, but hitting 400 at the crank is basically impossible. Need more cubes for that.
 
L

lit_mike_2001

New Member
Jan 25, 2003
163
1
0
Ada, OK
Nov 29, 2004
#3
  • Nov 29, 2004
  • #3
doable but its gonna take some revs
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Nov 29, 2004
#4
  • Nov 29, 2004
  • #4
Its doable, but you wouldn't want it in a street car. The thing will definitely need to see some revs to get that kind of power out of it. Do you want 400RWHP or 400FWHP?
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Nov 29, 2004
#5
  • Nov 29, 2004
  • #5
Yes, it is very doable indeed. I would go with afr 185 heads, a custom cam, and probably a very good flowing intake. Maybe a victor or a performer rpm2. Make sure you mention to the cam maker that 400hp is your goal. At the crank, 400 isn't too hard to get and 350 is easy with out of the box parts on a stock block. Just gotta have some planning and a higher compression than stock.
 
P

ponypowa2

New Member
May 17, 2004
228
0
0
Destin, FL
Nov 29, 2004
#6
  • Nov 29, 2004
  • #6
K thx for the replies.. I am trying to figure out the best way to acheive the most hp in the 400's without breaking the stock block ( mine is pretty much new). Would it make more sense and be more streetable if I aim for 300's in hp and then supercharge? I plan on using the car almost 100% on the street..
Its a hard decison for me, im starting to get some extra $$$ in and I need to decide whether to go n/a, supercharge, or turbo and stay within the limits of the block.
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Nov 29, 2004
#7
  • Nov 29, 2004
  • #7
If you bore and stroke it to sayyy,,,,,,331,or 347,,Id say its no problem
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Nov 29, 2004
#8
  • Nov 29, 2004
  • #8
2 things to get 400 RWHP out of a 302.

1) Spin it to 7000-7200.
2) Change the pistons.

With about 10.5:1 - 11:1 compression, and a piston that will accept a 2.02 valved head, you could probably do it fairly easily. I'd bet that you could do it in such a way that it would still be fairly street-able, too.

Joe
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Nov 30, 2004
#9
  • Nov 30, 2004
  • #9
Joes95GT said:
1) Spin it to 7000-7200.
2) Change the pistons.
Click to expand...
... which is why I said "no" in my response. Just an H/C/I on an otherwise stock 302 won't do it, because the stock block isn't up to the RPM required. Now, if you're going to build it from scratch, that be a different story ... (and I would stroke it then anyway, why the heck not)
Dave
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Nov 30, 2004
#10
  • Nov 30, 2004
  • #10
Joes95GT said:
2 things to get 400 RWHP out of a 302.

1) Spin it to 7000-7200.
2) Change the pistons.

With about 10.5:1 - 11:1 compression, and a piston that will accept a 2.02 valved head, you could probably do it fairly easily. I'd bet that you could do it in such a way that it would still be fairly street-able, too.

Joe
Click to expand...

do this and run 4.30s cause you will need them.

talk to jay allen to grind you a cam, or rick anderson.

you will want a holley systemax intake or an rpm2

we are talking RWHP here... you shoudl be able to hit 370+ at least.
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Nov 30, 2004
#11
  • Nov 30, 2004
  • #11
Rootus said:
... which is why I said "no" in my response. Just an H/C/I on an otherwise stock 302 won't do it, because the stock block isn't up to the RPM required. Now, if you're going to build it from scratch, that be a different story ... (and I would stroke it then anyway, why the heck not)
Dave
Click to expand...

stock block not spinning high, the answer is NO

it just wont happen due to the laws of physics.

you could take every bit of parasitic drag off the car, power steering a/c / run an electrical water pump and you would fall short
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Nov 30, 2004
#12
  • Nov 30, 2004
  • #12
95snoozer said:
stock block not spinning high, the answer is NO

it just wont happen due to the laws of physics.

you could take every bit of parasitic drag off the car, power steering a/c / run an electrical water pump and you would fall short
Click to expand...
I think what he meant by "stock block" was the stock internals too. The internals, mainly the pistons, wouldn't allow you use a large enough cylinder head to cut back on the RPM necessary. With a 1.90 valved head, you'd probably need to spin the motor to 8000 to get 400 RWHP out of it. At these types of RPM levels, you are taking a chance of a rod exiting stage left...

Joe
 
P

ponypowa2

New Member
May 17, 2004
228
0
0
Destin, FL
Nov 30, 2004
#13
  • Nov 30, 2004
  • #13
Alright guys thanks for the replies, im gonna join the turbo crowd and if I need more hp, upgrade the block then do a head cam intake install after the turbo
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Nov 30, 2004
#14
  • Nov 30, 2004
  • #14
I'm just going to go back to the original post, and take it worst case. Can you put together a H/C/I setup that will make 400 horsepower. Let's say crank horsepower, since that's a far easier target. I just don't think it's really a target that's practical, given the stated conditions. At best, 400 bhp is 340 rwhp, which I have yet to see anyone do (at least on here) with just H/C/I. Considering that most people think 300+ is a respectable target, I'm a bit surprised to see so many people in this thread who think 400 bhp is possible with H/C/I.

Or maybe I'm just dumb. Wouldn't surprise me a bit.

Dave
 
J

jghood13

New Member
Oct 2, 2003
160
0
0
NY
Dec 3, 2004
#15
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #15
there are people on here with 325 with h/c/i and people with stock cam and heads hiting 272 so why is 340 at the the rear wheels not possible I could see the happening
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Dec 3, 2004
#16
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #16
jghood13 said:
there are people on here with 325 with h/c/i and people with stock cam and heads hiting 272 so why is 340 at the the rear wheels not possible I could see the happening
Click to expand...
272 with stock heads? Who?! They must be a damn good engine builder.

Joe
 
J

jghood13

New Member
Oct 2, 2003
160
0
0
NY
Dec 3, 2004
#17
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #17
I think the car is a fox go figure
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Dec 3, 2004
#18
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #18
jghood13 said:
there are people on here with 325 with h/c/i and people with stock cam and heads hiting 272 so why is 340 at the the rear wheels not possible I could see the happening
Click to expand...
There's what, one person on here with 325? Two? These people with 320+ are the statistical outliers, on the top end of the spectrum. The vast majority of us with good H/C/I setups are right near 300 plus or minus. Sure 340 is possible, but I think it is very unlikely.

But why focus on dyno numbers anyway. There is much, much more to performance (street or track) than peak horsepower or peak torque.
 
J

jghood13

New Member
Oct 2, 2003
160
0
0
NY
Dec 3, 2004
#19
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #19
you know what Ill just have to hit 340 cause I know it wont take two much more just a good combo built to the max and she will still be streetable
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Dec 3, 2004
#20
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #20
jghood13 said:
you know what Ill just have to hit 340 cause I know it wont take two much more just a good combo built to the max and she will still be streetable
Click to expand...
I wouldn't try it on the stock shortblock. You'll be sorely dissapointed. If you can get it to run right, you'll have to knock the limiter out of it. If you knock the limiter out of it, you'll have to keep the revs above 2000 all the time. If you still run about 2000 RPM no problem, you'll be shifting at 7000. A stock rotating assembly doesn't like it. Rods like to detach from the crankshaft and exit stage right. I've seen it.

Good luck in your adventure, though.

Joe
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Resolved Need some assistance. Holley Terminator X alongside H/C/I. Very rough/inconsistent idle
  • karhoot
  • Jun 6, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
102
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
karhoot
K
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
980
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Fuel Vortech Supercharger injectors
  • Dontknowchit
  • Mar 13, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 8, 2026
from6to8
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
967
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
X
Engine 5.0 Head Gaskets installed wrong block coolant passages???
  • Xam Sirrah
  • Jul 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
695
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 22, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?