• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Has Anyone noticed much power increase with 1.7 rockers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jay5_o
  • Start date Start date Aug 27, 2004

Jay5_o

New Member
Jan 3, 2004
82
0
0
calgary, canada
Aug 27, 2004
#1
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #1
I was thining of picking a set of cranes 1.7 rockers , but just wondering if the price is justified for the increase in power if any?
any improvements in track time?
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Aug 27, 2004
#2
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #2
i would go with 1.6 the 1.7's are a bit much with stock springs but you could do it you might notice a little difference....................
 

Jay5_o

New Member
Jan 3, 2004
82
0
0
calgary, canada
Aug 27, 2004
#3
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #3
the 1.6 is stock in 87-93 5.0's... are they not ?
 
S

seijirou

Founding Member
Aug 15, 2002
2,417
4
48
DFW
Aug 27, 2004
#4
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #4
Jay5_o said:
the 1.6 is stock in 87-93 5.0's... are they not ?
Click to expand...

Yeah but their about as precision as hand held pencil sharpener. The ratio can vary anywhere from 1.5 to 1.7 per rocker arm. some good aftermarket rockers you know are true to their claim.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 27, 2004
#5
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #5
I'd say that if you're planning to stick with the stock cam and you've got other intake and exhaust mods already, go ahead and grab the 1.7rr's along with a better set of springs. But it’s going to do little for a stock engine, so make it one of your last mods.

I've got them on mine (1.7's), but i've also got ported heads, intake, full exhaust, pulleys, CAI, gears, etc, etc. Don't expect huge power gains either way, but they're worth a few ponies along with other mods. Probably in the 5-10fwhp range.

If you're planning on swapping out the cam, the stick with the 1.6rr’s and concentrate on cam selection to provide any added lift you might want. 1.7rr's have been shown to place added stress on valve train (increased side load and friction on valve guides and valve stems), especially when the horsepower and RPM potential starts to climb.

How's that....clear as mud?
 
M

Mattys5Oh

Founding Member
Sep 28, 2002
216
0
0
Western, Mass
Aug 27, 2004
#6
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #6
When I installed mine the SOTP dyno said I gained alot. I was actually very impressed. They are 1.72's and fit under the VC and the stock springs seem to be handling it well.


Matt
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 27, 2004
#7
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #7
Mattys5Oh said:
When I installed mine the SOTP dyno said I gained alot. I was actually very impressed. They are 1.72's and fit under the VC and the stock springs seem to be handling it well.


Matt
Click to expand...
The SOTP dyno can be a little bias at times. Do you think you actually gained any real power, or is it because you mentally you know you’ve added an aftermarket part and think that you should have. The nice thing about them is their accuracy compared to the stockers and since they’re roller, they cut back on friction and allow the engine to rev a little more freely, but I doubt any real power was achieved. That’s assuming that you’re still running a mainly stock set up. As for the valve springs….changing them isn’t mandatory, but some have experience a little float at the upper end of the RPM limits. That’s why I upgraded mine.
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Aug 27, 2004
#8
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #8
some guy on here added 1.7 rockers and picked up like 8-10 hp on the dyno. if you want, ill find the thread and then link you to it.
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Aug 27, 2004
#9
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #9
I'm in the same situation, i got a set in the garage(for free ), just wondering if i should bother installing them??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
727
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
D
Rockers, lash adjusters and timing: help with parts (4.6 2v)
  • dvigAtel
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
0
Views
249
Other Auto Tech Nov 1, 2025
dvigAtel
D
B
Engine Strange Noise
  • burntokita
  • May 8, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
392
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 11, 2026
keel
P
2000 GT Random Power Loss
  • Pinellas50
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
298
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2026
Pinellas50
P
D
No start
  • dkrupp79
  • May 31, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
191
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2025
dkrupp79
D
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?