• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Head Gasket Trouble - Pull Engine

  • Thread starter Thread starter stang89bidges
  • Start date Start date Jan 23, 2015
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • …
  • 23
Next
First Prev 13 of 23 Next Last

stang89bidges

Advanced Member
Mar 14, 2014
727
144
74
Fort Worth Texas
Apr 27, 2015
#241
  • Apr 27, 2015
  • #241
That's what I thought... All the research I did and the book I bought says oil slinger bolts onto Crankshaft and also my book has pic of round eccentric for manual fuel pump. The way they talked about it too. Must be talking about early model 302's...
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Apr 27, 2015
#242
  • Apr 27, 2015
  • #242
RangerJoe said:
Looking good. Fyi, if you are staying file injected and running an electric pump, the fuel eccentric on the cam gear is not needed. That is for running a mechanical pump.

Joe
Click to expand...

This is a fuel pump eccentric.



Edit: I see you caught it already.
 

stang89bidges

Advanced Member
Mar 14, 2014
727
144
74
Fort Worth Texas
Apr 27, 2015
#243
  • Apr 27, 2015
  • #243
So does that eccentric also sling oil or iS that where a separate "crankshaft" slinger comes into the picture?
 

Chuckman

GTFO you fat, heavy bastard
15 Year Member
Oct 21, 2005
1,604
1,002
173
st. louis, mo
Apr 27, 2015
#244
  • Apr 27, 2015
  • #244
the piece you have on it now is just the factory oil slinger, ford put it in as extra insurance that the timing set would get properly lubed, i left mine off, a lot of people do.

the piece that mike posted for a mechanical fuel pump on a carbed car (mounts on timing cover), there may have been a few in the '86 or so era as ford used up stock (same as why the early '89s have an 85mph speedo vs the later 140mph) but your car wont need it.
 

stang89bidges

Advanced Member
Mar 14, 2014
727
144
74
Fort Worth Texas
Apr 27, 2015
#245
  • Apr 27, 2015
  • #245
Ok so now I know why my car has the dam 85mph speedo. Sux. Good to know. You guys are full of it, knowledge that is
 

stang89bidges

Advanced Member
Mar 14, 2014
727
144
74
Fort Worth Texas
Apr 27, 2015
#246
  • Apr 27, 2015
  • #246
New question. My pickup tube is only .05 in from bottom of pan. My book says to make sure its within a half inch or .5 in. Is there such a thing as too close? Do I need to bend it again?
 

stang89bidges

Advanced Member
Mar 14, 2014
727
144
74
Fort Worth Texas
Apr 27, 2015
#247
  • Apr 27, 2015
  • #247
Forgot to add the gasket, with my 1 piece oild pan gasket its now .15-.16 clearance. I just found this on canton website:

Canton Racing Products - Oil Pan Accessories Tech

I guess its back to the blow torch...
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Apr 27, 2015
#248
  • Apr 27, 2015
  • #248
Take a piece of modeling clay and cut a piece about 3/8" thick. Lay it ontop of your pickup screen. . put down your pan gasket. lay your pan ontop and put some light pressure on the pan. Remove the pan and see measure the thickness of the clay. It helps to spray the clay with pam so it doesnt stick.
 

stang89bidges

Advanced Member
Mar 14, 2014
727
144
74
Fort Worth Texas
Apr 27, 2015
#249
  • Apr 27, 2015
  • #249
Modifying the pickup.

After a couple times of heating and bending the pickup I got it close enough. I'm only nervous about the angle at this point but the lowest part is the screen so I'm leaving it.






Canton website says between .312-.375 in. The more I bend it the worse the angle gets so this will have to do.



 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Apr 28, 2015
#250
  • Apr 28, 2015
  • #250
mikestang63 said:
This is a fuel pump eccentric.



Edit: I see you caught it already.
Click to expand...

I stand corrected...

Joe
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,933
21,108
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 30, 2015
#251
  • Apr 30, 2015
  • #251
@stang89bidges

I saw the email that you send to the help desk. Couple things... I'm not sure what specific images you are talking about since there was no link. If you're worried that deleting the images from your hosted site will ruin the thread then my response is that I don't think that it will.

You can try it though: Test with one image. Stangnet makes it's own copies for linked images and shouldn't be affected if you need to move or delete them from your host.

Anyway,

If this is not what you're referring to then hit up your moderators for help with what you need done. If they don't have the means to assist then they'll hit me up for additional options.

@madmike1157 @FastDriver
 

stang89bidges

Advanced Member
Mar 14, 2014
727
144
74
Fort Worth Texas
Apr 30, 2015
#252
  • Apr 30, 2015
  • #252
Thanks I will give it a try then
 

stang89bidges

Advanced Member
Mar 14, 2014
727
144
74
Fort Worth Texas
May 5, 2015
#253
  • May 5, 2015
  • #253
I have a problem. Got my heads back(resurfaced and valve job done) and i'm checking piston to valve(P2V) clearance. One side ended up within spec of .080 intake and 1.0 exhaust. The other side is an issue. I'm coming up between .01 and .03 P2V clearance on intake valves.

I'm using the clay method, and i'm using the original hydraulic lifters but I don't think this matters at this point, with a solid lifter the results would be worse if the clay is depressing the friggin lifter. I'm at a loss as what to do next...

This engine builder I found local says I should not be having a problem. He took .020 off both heads. The heads have been milled before however but I don't know how much. I'm guessing another .020 if I remember right so that gives a total of .040. Engine builder thinks I am doing something wrong because he is dead set on thinking I should be fine.

He also mentioned that if he took .020 off the heads, and I am measuring a lowest point of .010 clearance, then I would have had P2V clearance issues before he started. That would make the heads come in at .030 before I started.

Regardless of what anyone says, I started out with no gasket, and the valves were coming into contact with pistons I could feel as I turned over the motor. When I grabbed my old gasket that is when I came up with the clearance numbers above. I am using all stock, cam, pistons, valves, springs, heads. I put a new timing chain on as you can see a picture of that in my previous posts. I know I have that installed correctly at straight up.
 

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
May 5, 2015
#254
  • May 5, 2015
  • #254
You still need to used a solid lifter. If the lifter compresses any, it will make it seem like it has more clearance. So your first side might be tighter than you think. Its best to take all the variables that can alter the readings out of the picture. It only takes a few minutes to convert a lifter to a solid. Even with the timing set installed dot to dot, its good to verify the parts you are using were made correctly. Lots of things can stack up from the crank to the valves as there are a lot of parts that can be off.
 

stang89bidges

Advanced Member
Mar 14, 2014
727
144
74
Fort Worth Texas
May 5, 2015
#255
  • May 5, 2015
  • #255
Exactly, if its tighter then i'm definitely screwed... Its not going to do me any good to use a solid lifter at this point right? I'm not even close with the hydr lifters!! The question now is have the heads been milled too much or could it be something else?

My good side had intakes at around .080 and exhaust around 1.0-1.1 so doesn't that mean that even if my new timing chain is off then adjusting it a little wouldn't help? Also, if my heads were milled lets say .060 total then I still shouldn't see that low of clearance right? If they start out at .080 from factory then I should at least see .020 after .060 was milled...
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
May 5, 2015
#256
  • May 5, 2015
  • #256
I have to think something was not done correctly. I don't see how there could be such a huge difference. Try a different t piston on the bank that is coming up short.

Joe
 

stang89bidges

Advanced Member
Mar 14, 2014
727
144
74
Fort Worth Texas
May 5, 2015
#257
  • May 5, 2015
  • #257
I did 3 of them, they are all much shorter than other side. When I had heads checked first time a year ago the shop only did 1 head and I don't know how much he took off unfortunately. Then they were warped a hair the second time I had heads checked about 6 months ago so both got milked this time. Now on my 3rd blown head gasket failure they were both done .020 and I think it's possible that the 1 head that was miled 3 times could be .060 total but I really don't know.

I'm afraid I may just have to bite the bullet and get new heads. I dunno what else to do.
 

stang89bidges

Advanced Member
Mar 14, 2014
727
144
74
Fort Worth Texas
May 6, 2015
#258
  • May 6, 2015
  • #258
This turned out to be another perfect example of what not to do. I really hope some newbie like myself out there catches this post and learns from my mistakes.

I did a ton of research, but it still didn't help. I trusted a particular video from a reputable TV show and thought, hey, I can do this. And I did. I did it very well too I am sure of that. But I wasn't supposed to do this on my particular heads.

Couple of specific lessons to learn from this post:
1. If porting your stock E7TE heads do not touch the CC(combustion chambers). And do very light work in the other areas as you are not a master of this craft and that is what it takes to do a good job.
2. Blueprint your work. Everything you have done(like milling your heads), make sure you document the procedure and don't leave out any details. So when you come back and rebuild your engine on your own you know what your starting with and will help you make your decisions.

If I knew ahead of time that milling my heads could be an issue I would have never ported them. Maybe polished them up but I would have never touched the combustion chamber.

What I have learned from this process so far is a lot. Unfortunately I have learned the hard way and ruined a set of heads. I ruined them a long time ago when I let the first machine shop mill only 1 head instead of both of them. Then of course I didn't blueprint that work. Second time I didn't blueprint the work either. 3rd time was a charm. Took too much off the heads and boom, I have 2 totally different sets of heads with a brand new 3 angle valve job, nice even deck surfaces, refreshed valves, new seals, and are simply a very expensive set of paper weights.
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
May 6, 2015
#259
  • May 6, 2015
  • #259
I hate to hear this man, keep your head up. I don't know if it is a possible solution, but what about using two different head gaskets? Possibly the thickest one you can get On the shorter side.

In reality , a new set of heads is probably the best solution, but just trying to think outside of the box. Maybe even try swapping heads from bank to bank and see.

Good luck with it.

Joe
 
Reactions: A5literMan

stang89bidges

Advanced Member
Mar 14, 2014
727
144
74
Fort Worth Texas
May 6, 2015
#260
  • May 6, 2015
  • #260
thanks man. can't switch the heads because when i ported the CC's(and this is the part of the porting that I did NOT do good on...) I went further on one head than the other. so when i presented this to the engine builder the only thing he could do was mill the heads until the gasket wasn't peering over my scribe and cut. Then when he laid the gaskets over the heads, he noticed that we had to switch the heads because the gaskets are a hair different when flipped over. And of course it was the wrong way so he switched my ports/plugs for the smog crap allowing me to swap sides of the heads and keep the gaskets working best on the bad head.

See when I ported them, I did one head that night, then I posted my work that night on this thread. Immediately I got replies from you guys on here telling me NO! Don't touch the CC's! So when I did the second head I didn't want them to be too different so I deshrouded them a little but not all the way up to the scribe line of gasket.

I should have quit right there and just started looking for new heads but I was too determined to make them work... But then as time passed and I started coming to the end of the rebuild, it started keeping me up at night thinking about those dam heads. Thinking 1, I started this venture because I was blowing head gaskets, and 2, I screwed them up and I will see detonation on my protruding gaskets and end up blowing them again!! I just knew I was screwed I just couldn't admit it.

Bottom line, I really appreciate the information you all have given me over the past month or so. I am on a time crunch with this build and that is just a bad thing when its your first rebuild. I should have listened more on the porting advice but hey, I'm going to end up getting new heads out of this experience so stay tuned because it ain't over!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • …
  • 23
Next
First Prev 13 of 23 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Engine Mysterious coolant leak at back of engine
  • palerider94
  • Jan 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
168
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 19, 2026
AeroCoupe
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
614
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
A
Help ID - Turbo GT, SVO differences
  • aldoelmalo
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
55
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
aldoelmalo
A
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
622
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
D
Fox won't crank over and fuel pump won't kick on.
  • djj62478
  • Jun 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
224
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 11, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?