• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Header Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter mhjo
  • Start date Start date Aug 18, 2014

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Aug 18, 2014
#1
  • Aug 18, 2014
  • #1
I have the HiPo manifolds right now. I have upgraded engine with roller cam setup, and wonder if I have anything to gain by switching to headers?

And if so, I saw at summit that they have shorty, medium, Tri-Y and full-size. What to go for (if go for)
 
O

other_shoe

Member
May 4, 2007
313
3
19
Aug 29, 2014
#2
  • Aug 29, 2014
  • #2
mhjo said:
I have the HiPo manifolds right now. I have upgraded engine with roller cam setup, and wonder if I have anything to gain by switching to headers?

And if so, I saw at summit that they have shorty, medium, Tri-Y and full-size. What to go for (if go for)
Click to expand...

I believe there was some testing on the HiPo manifolds vs. Tri-Y finding no appreciable difference. It was discussed in a thread here a couple of years ago.
 
B

barnett468

Active Member
Aug 1, 2014
179
24
28
Aug 29, 2014
#3
  • Aug 29, 2014
  • #3
mhjo said:
I have the HiPo manifolds right now. I have upgraded engine with roller cam setup, and wonder if I have anything to gain by switching to headers?

And if so, I saw at summit that they have shorty, medium, Tri-Y and full-size. What to go for (if go for)
Click to expand...

hello;

what heads do you have?

what intake?

exactly what cam?

what size is your engine?
.
 

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Sep 18, 2014
#4
  • Sep 18, 2014
  • #4
Edelbrock heads
Edelbrock dual plane intake
Comp Cam 31-422-8 (270-HR) Roller
289
 

Falcon79

Active Member
Apr 6, 2009
214
8
29
Dallas, TX
Sep 18, 2014
#5
  • Sep 18, 2014
  • #5
I like JBA long tubes, good fit even around a large transmission like my AOD. Performance is good but you will have to put them on to see. My setup is similar to yours.

Gt40 heads ported and polished
Edelbrock dual plane intake
Ford racing e303 cam
Roller 306
 
Last edited: Sep 18, 2014

latamud

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
791
2
19
Tampa, FL
Sep 18, 2014
#6
  • Sep 18, 2014
  • #6
In my opinion, if you want to keep the vintage look then run the Hipo manifolds. I like to run long tubes, Hokker has a set for around $200 last time I checked which was not too much more than a set of Tri-Ys. Shortys or Tri-Ys will keep lower end torque which would be good paired with a dual plane intake. I prefer long tubes, I think they give the best exhaust note.
 
B

barnett468

Active Member
Aug 1, 2014
179
24
28
Sep 18, 2014
#7
  • Sep 18, 2014
  • #7
mhjo said:
Edelbrock heads
Edelbrock dual plane intake
Comp Cam 31-422-8 (270-HR) Roller
289
Click to expand...

ok imo, you will not gain enough power to feel with your particular set up. if you are looking for quicker acceleration you can achieve this by installing numerically higher gears.

you should have at least 3.40 gears with your set up otherwise it will be a bit of a slug off the line.

i would also use at least a 2000 rpm stall converter.

you will benefit from an msd 6al-2 box.

if your timing is less than around 12 at idle and around 34 at around 2600 - 2800 rpm with the vacuum advance disconnected, i would try setting it to that.
.
.
 
Last edited: Sep 18, 2014

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Sep 28, 2014
#8
  • Sep 28, 2014
  • #8
Thankks all. I will stay with the HiPo for now.

Barnett468: Thanks for other advice.
1. I run 3:55 gears
2. I have an extra aod converter (Hughes). Can you explain therpm/stall converter thing?
3. 6AL box; What does one actually gain from the 6AL box?
 
B

barnett468

Active Member
Aug 1, 2014
179
24
28
Sep 29, 2014
#9
  • Sep 29, 2014
  • #9
mhjo said:
Thankks all. I will stay with the HiPo for now.

Barnett468: Thanks for other advice.
1. I run 3:55 gears
2. I have an extra aod converter (Hughes). Can you explain therpm/stall converter thing?
3. 6AL box; What does one actually gain from the 6AL box?
Click to expand...

no prob, you're welcome.

if a stall is 2000 rpm for example, the converter will rev to that rpm before it accelerates if you floor the car. if you taje off nirmally it will accelerate much sooner than that and will be fully engaged sooner. it will also go into "neutral" or disengage at a higher rpm when you let off the gas so you will loose engine braking sooner. look for "tci converter stall" on youtube.com. it helps explain it.
.
 

mhjo

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2000
490
0
17
Oslo, Norway
Sep 30, 2014
#10
  • Sep 30, 2014
  • #10
Thanks. Any thougts on the 6AL?
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Oct 12, 2014
#11
  • Oct 12, 2014
  • #11
I have JBA mid length headers and am very pleased with them. If you switch, consider them. The HiPo manifolds are fine, and I might leave them be.
 
B

barnett468

Active Member
Aug 1, 2014
179
24
28
Oct 13, 2014
#12
  • Oct 13, 2014
  • #12
mhjo said:
Thanks. Any thougts on the 6AL?
Click to expand...

Hello;

Sorry I forgot that, all the 6 boxes increase coil voltage and have multi spark until around 3500 rpm. They are very helpful on some cars but it depends on how they are tuned. The better the tune and smaller the cam the less benefit they are. i would use one on a high perf build just for insurance, I don’t see how one can possibly hurt. You can also run leaner than normal wit one and they can increase hp and tq on some engines. If you do not need a rev limiter just but the plain 6 box for $200.00 from summit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
4 bank eliminator chip
  • JJ's90fox
  • Feb 17, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
124
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 17, 2026
AeroCoupe
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
H
Brand New Built 302 overheating
  • hassler
  • Sep 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
Rcdgl
R
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
502
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
640
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?