• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Headers Long vs. Mid on FI Stang

  • Thread starter Thread starter cooper58d2002
  • Start date Start date Feb 18, 2010

cooper58d2002

New Member
Jan 3, 2006
98
0
0
Hope Mills NC
Feb 18, 2010
#1
  • Feb 18, 2010
  • #1
I come home for a couple weeks after being away 9 months pop the hood of the Stang and the coolant level was totally empty. Needless to say the first thing that popped in my mind was the intake manifold and sure enough there was coolant in the valley so I ordered the new Trick Flow intake and 75mm throttle body so I can install it all in a couple months when I am back for a little longer. Well the more I think about it the more I think I need to maximize the parts I put on before I take it to the dyno so naturally I think headers. My only thing is I really can’t decide long tube or mid length, I have a tubular K-member already so I really am not worried about install. The clearance issues of long tubes concerns me and if I only get a couple more ponies out of it I would rather put the mid lengths in rather than cringe every time I go over a speed bump, but if theres a lot more power out of the long tubes then I am all for it. I have tried looking up comparison specs on long tube vs. mid length headers but I really can’t find anything about how much more power you get with forced induction. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Coop
 

flstang65

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2007
1,484
135
94
SE Georgia
Feb 18, 2010
#2
  • Feb 18, 2010
  • #2
Personally, I would go with the long tubes. The ground clearance will be a bit of an issue, but if your car is lowered already, they you are used to driving cautiously around certain bumps. A few of my friends have them and have seen really nice gains from them and the sound is pretty sweet.
 
M

MustangLife

Active Member
Jan 5, 2003
1,285
0
36
Chattanooga, TN
Feb 18, 2010
#3
  • Feb 18, 2010
  • #3
If you go over alot of speed bumps in your daily driving duties get midlengths. If speed bumps aren't an issue get long tubes. You'll be happy with both most likely. I have some deep speed bumps at my apartments and my x-pipe has already had hitting and loosening issues along with exhaust leaks cause of this. So Long Tubes to me are out of the question.
 
9

97predator

Member
Aug 18, 2003
302
0
16
va beach
Feb 19, 2010
#4
  • Feb 19, 2010
  • #4
Long tubes. Just cross the speed bumps at an angle. Rubbin' is racing.
 

tank_567

Active Member
Mar 19, 2007
731
26
29
Raleigh, Nc
Feb 19, 2010
#5
  • Feb 19, 2010
  • #5
i have mids and I picked up 20rwhp+ w/ off road h, just as much as long tubes. Plus I dont have to worry about speed bumps.
 

Rickyll7

Member
Dec 16, 2005
718
4
19
Feb 19, 2010
#6
  • Feb 19, 2010
  • #6
Yeah, but I think most of that gain is from removing the cats... I don't think there is a whole lot of difference between long and mid lengths. Maybe 5hp... but that all depends on how much hp your making. There is probably no difference in hp if your only making 200 rwhp, maybe 5 at 350-400 rwhp, but could be a lot more if your at 600+ rwhp and may be worth the extra money and hastle. When I was N/A ~300rwhp, I switched from shorties to longtubes with no other changes and I couldn't feel the difference.

So if you want every last hp and don't think you'll hit them on speed bumps, etc., get the longtubes. If you want to save a few bucks and/or are worried about hitting them on stuff, just get some mid lengths.
 

Blackone51

Member
Oct 30, 2008
201
2
16
Feb 19, 2010
#7
  • Feb 19, 2010
  • #7
cooper58d2002 said:
I come home for a couple weeks after being away 9 months pop the hood of the Stang and the coolant level was totally empty. Needless to say the first thing that popped in my mind was the intake manifold and sure enough there was coolant in the valley so I ordered the new Trick Flow intake and 75mm throttle body so I can install it all in a couple months when I am back for a little longer. Well the more I think about it the more I think I need to maximize the parts I put on before I take it to the dyno so naturally I think headers. My only thing is I really can’t decide long tube or mid length, I have a tubular K-member already so I really am not worried about install. The clearance issues of long tubes concerns me and if I only get a couple more ponies out of it I would rather put the mid lengths in rather than cringe every time I go over a speed bump, but if theres a lot more power out of the long tubes then I am all for it. I have tried looking up comparison specs on long tube vs. mid length headers but I really can’t find anything about how much more power you get with forced induction. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Coop
Click to expand...
Hey how many lbs of boost you running to get that 427 ponies?
 
M

Midnight2V

Member
Jan 30, 2009
224
0
16
Oklahoma
Feb 19, 2010
#8
  • Feb 19, 2010
  • #8
Sorry this post is slightly off topic -

I notice that you don't have a set of cams listed in your sig. For the price you pay for a set of headers and mid pipe plus install, you could buy and install a set of cams. As far as power production, I think you would be WAY better of going for cams than you would for headers. Especially in forced induction, not to mention the mods you already have. But that's just my two cents.
 

Rickyll7

Member
Dec 16, 2005
718
4
19
Feb 19, 2010
#9
  • Feb 19, 2010
  • #9
Midnight2V said:
Sorry this post is slightly off topic -

I notice that you don't have a set of cams listed in your sig. For the price you pay for a set of headers and mid pipe plus install, you could buy and install a set of cams. As far as power production, I think you would be WAY better of going for cams than you would for headers. Especially in forced induction, not to mention the mods you already have. But that's just my two cents.
Click to expand...

 

usaf_branham

15 Year Member
Oct 30, 2008
927
134
84
Boston
Feb 19, 2010
#10
  • Feb 19, 2010
  • #10
Kenne Bell did bolt on tests with the twin screw and in the higher horsepower cars, longtubes caused them to lose horsepower...

However, I have bbk lt's and a twin screw... i am very happy with the combo. My only complaint about the lt's is the install. Its a PITA! Good luck.
 

Rickyll7

Member
Dec 16, 2005
718
4
19
Feb 19, 2010
#11
  • Feb 19, 2010
  • #11
usaf_branham said:
Kenne Bell did bolt on tests with the twin screw and in the higher horsepower cars, longtubes caused them to lose horsepower...

However, I have bbk lt's and a twin screw... i am very happy with the combo. My only complaint about the lt's is the install. Its a PITA! Good luck.
Click to expand...

Do you have a link to those test results? I'm interested in reading up on that.
 

cooper58d2002

New Member
Jan 3, 2006
98
0
0
Hope Mills NC
Feb 19, 2010
#12
  • Feb 19, 2010
  • #12
Blackone51 said:
Hey how many lbs of boost you running to get that 427 ponies?
Click to expand...

I'm running a 3.60 pulley and the dial reads 12 @ full boost, but that's with the stock everything minus some minor fuel upgrades i.e. pump, injectors, and a 90mm MAF. I am thinking it may go down a pound or two when i free up the induction and exhaust. I think most of the power was had from the tune. It cost me an assload of money for that tune but it was worth it in the end. I have been running that tune on and off for years now and have had zero issues.
 

cooper58d2002

New Member
Jan 3, 2006
98
0
0
Hope Mills NC
Feb 19, 2010
#13
  • Feb 19, 2010
  • #13
Thanks all, the more i look at it the more i think mid lengths are the way to go just for the simple fact that I drive my car to work all the time and their always putting a speed bump in the most random spot imaginable, and their always so dam high that my F-150 will scrape Lol. I just havent been able to find anything that proves the longtubes make more power than midlengths on a forced induction engine for me to justify the risk. Now the question for me is do i waste the money for ceramic coating?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
663
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Can makes noises when driving poping
  • Creomod
  • Oct 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
540
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2025
Creomod
S
Engine 2003 Mach 1 Automatic Upgrades assistance
  • SJK1417M1AT
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
256
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 21, 2025
01SVTvertt
0
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
650
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?