• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

headers vs. intake manifold

  • Thread starter Thread starter jshelton2006
  • Start date Start date Oct 31, 2006
J

jshelton2006

New Member
Oct 30, 2006
8
0
0
Indiana
Oct 31, 2006
#1
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #1
i have a 95 mustang gt with bbk cai, o/r h pipe, american thunder catback, and msd ignition in the performance category. next i plan on either headers or intake, but im not sure which - $$ is an issue so i need either one or the other for now. which would be best and give me more power with my car? i know an edelbrock intake claims to give 37 hp at 5500 rpms, how much do headers add? Also what headers are best? I have looked at hookers. I want LTs, so which brand are easiest to install? As far as intake i am looking at either trick flow or edelbrock. Anyone know power gains on any of this? Thanks a lot
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Oct 31, 2006
#2
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #2
I wnet headers first strictly because my factory studs were broken and I got headers used for $100.

I would say that headers are cheaper but an intake is more bang for the buck, or so I have heard...
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Oct 31, 2006
#3
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #3
IMHO an intake would net you more hp/tq through out the rpm range.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Oct 31, 2006
#4
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #4
I vote intake too, and I really like the edelbrock performer too.
 

gcomfx.com

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,690
0
56
Republic, MO
Oct 31, 2006
#5
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #5
Intake... I still have stock manifolds. I'll change to headers when I put new heads on the car.
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Oct 31, 2006
#6
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #6
intake manifold... if you dont have 2 much cash go pull one from an explorer maybe then you can offord both...
 

94tang

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 24, 2003
297
4
19
East TN
Oct 31, 2006
#7
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #7
you wont get a whole lot more power out of either one of them,but the intake would be the better choice
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Oct 31, 2006
#8
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #8
It would be helpful if you gave us some kind of idea about your long term goals for the car.

I say that cause you have plainly said money is an issue so you only wanna buy a part once that will fit into those plans.

Like do you want an intake with the longest runner street upper
or
One with mid length runners because it might fit better with h/c/i

About your header Q's .................

BBK or Mac LT's will be about the same as far as installation goes so pick either one. You can find peeps say good or bad about each brand.

From the general all around info given ....................

I'd throw in with all my other SN buds and agree about doing the intake first.
HOWEVER
You would be wise to look into which upper would be better for what you wanna do or where you wanna go with your Stang

Grady
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Oct 31, 2006
#9
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #9
94tang said:
you wont get a whole lot more power out of either one of them,but the intake would be the better choice
Click to expand...
I would disagree with that. Headers wont get you much, but an intake manifold will. I gained 3mph in the quarter just from an Edel Performer. Huge difference there. Its in my top 3 or 4 mods that made me faster.
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Oct 31, 2006
#10
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #10
Like Grady said. Think about your overall goal for your car. Then, if like me, you have to budget your mods you won't waste money buying the wrong parts.

That said, I bought my headers first ONLY because they were the ones I had planned on buying and the price was right. Unused ceramic coated equal length BBKs for $260 'buy it now' on ebay was a deal I couldn't pass up. They didn't do anything but look good until I did the heads and X-pipe.

For me heads was the biggest HP gain. Followed by the intake and then X-pipe. Headers would come after those.
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Oct 31, 2006
#11
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #11
don't forget though that long tube headers will require you to ditch your o/r h-pipe in favor of a shorter midpipe to go with the long tubes. it's not a direct bolt on like an intake is.

i would look in the classifieds on here and over on the corral.net. you can get some really good deals on intakes and used parts in general.
 

WHITE94COBRA

New Member
Nov 14, 2003
816
0
0
HUNTINGTON BEACH
Oct 31, 2006
#12
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #12
Ok i'll make this even easier, you have stock headers right now and you want full length, which means your also going to need a midpipe, computing the cost of headers and midpipe, (used) your looking at 300 - 350 (good deal) and this is assuming your doing the work. You can get a used performer for about 300 - 350, unless you get a great deal, and I believe you get more out of the intake on a basically stock car.
 
J

jshelton2006

New Member
Oct 30, 2006
8
0
0
Indiana
Oct 31, 2006
#13
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #13
Ok which intake would work best? Edelbrock performer or trick flow? Eventually i want to put heads and cam in it, but that wont come until i get the money.
 

WHITE94COBRA

New Member
Nov 14, 2003
816
0
0
HUNTINGTON BEACH
Oct 31, 2006
#14
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #14
Now that is a question you can answere yourself, What are your goals? A certain goal will get you different answere's. Here's an example : I wanted my 94 to be a road race car, so I am going with a setup that makes power higher in my RPM band, so I let Ed C. know where I wanted my power to be, got the heads set up for the cam specks, and topped it with an intake that will perform the best with the other two. Ok now with that being said, on your current setup, a Edelbrock performer will work just fine, and it's actually a pretty good intake with heads and a cam. So is the trick flow track heat, or it might be the street heat? I'm not too familiar with the trick flow stuff. It's comperable to the performer. I have no experience with the RPM II, but I got the regular RPM for my setup, And I have heard good things about the RPM II, not sure about a stock setup for that one though.

jshelton2006 said:
Ok which intake would work best? Edelbrock performer or trick flow? Eventually i want to put heads and cam in it, but that wont come until i get the money.
Click to expand...
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Nov 1, 2006
#15
  • Nov 1, 2006
  • #15
Please don't think ANY intake is going to give you 37HP......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?