• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Headers vs. manifolds

  • Thread starter Thread starter carguysx2
  • Start date Start date Feb 6, 2011
C

carguysx2

New Member
Jan 9, 2011
3
0
0
Feb 6, 2011
#1
  • Feb 6, 2011
  • #1
Hey folks! Our recently acquired 66 coupe has what is reportedly a newly rebuilt (5 yrs ago, but not run in 4 yrs) 302 installed. Just picked up the presumed orig 289 block and heads. The car now has headers on it, but do not like the low hang-down look and am contemplating going back to stock exhaust manifolds. The old 289 has only one manifold on it. Question: if we can locate another manifold for the missing side of the 289, will they fit the 302, or do we need to find 302 stock manifolds? Thanks in advance!
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Feb 6, 2011
#2
  • Feb 6, 2011
  • #2
The exhaust manifolds on 64-70 289/302 engines are completely interchangeable.

One other possibility, which will give you better performance than the stock manifolds, is the 289HP manifolds.
 

Realmongo

I prefer to be called "Evil Genius"
Founding Member
Oct 10, 2001
2,468
86
99
Western Mass
Feb 6, 2011
#3
  • Feb 6, 2011
  • #3
The HiPo manifolds are a good choice, but will not work with hot-air chokes, which means you will need to use a manual or electric choke.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Feb 6, 2011
#4
  • Feb 6, 2011
  • #4
I wish you'd told me that before I'd done it a couple times.

Just run a 1/4" steel tube from the choke down toward the exhaust in the usual manner, but slightly longer, and band-clamped parallel to the RH exhaust pipe a few inches. Works perfectly.
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Feb 6, 2011
#5
  • Feb 6, 2011
  • #5
351 W manifolds are also a good choice for the early 289/302 engines as well. They breathe better than the cast iron logs that come stock on either motor!
 
6

68xstang

Member
Sep 29, 2010
52
0
6
Feb 7, 2011
#6
  • Feb 7, 2011
  • #6
woodsnake said:
351 W manifolds are also a good choice for the early 289/302 engines as well. They breathe better than the cast iron logs that come stock on either motor!
Click to expand...

If you have powersteering, you will have to reroute the hoses to/from the pump, beacuse the driver side 351W is much larger than 289/302 stock.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Feb 7, 2011
#7
  • Feb 7, 2011
  • #7
The downside to using 351W manifolds is there's no exhaust system made for using them on a 289/302, the best you can do is get a 351W H pipe and beat it into place.
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Feb 7, 2011
#8
  • Feb 7, 2011
  • #8
I've always just had custom duals installed--never used a 'kit' like you mail order. It hasn't been anymore or less expensive using headers and duals or stock manifolds and duals.. The choice of pipe diameter or mufflers has been the deciding factor. I had 2 1/2 in pipe with "H" and glass packs put on my 67 for 400.00 bucks..
 
G

grainboy

Member
Feb 2, 2006
140
0
17
Goodyear, AZ
Feb 8, 2011
#9
  • Feb 8, 2011
  • #9
I have had both the log style and the hipo manifolds, and could not tell any difference at all, from the drivers seat. My car ran suprisingly well with the log style, never burned any plug wires, and never had any leaks.
 
6

68xstang

Member
Sep 29, 2010
52
0
6
Feb 14, 2011
#10
  • Feb 14, 2011
  • #10
2+2GT said:
The downside to using 351W manifolds is there's no exhaust system made for using them on a 289/302, the best you can do is get a 351W H pipe and beat it into place.
Click to expand...

The difference between 289/302 and 351W is not that much. However if you want really good fitment, you most probably need to do some cutting and welding.
I have the 351W on my 289 -68 coupe, and it fits well. I just had to modify the driver side front pipe a bit. The passenger side was perfect.
Note, I had my exhaust system made at a local exhaust pipe workshop.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
460
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
668
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
H
SOLD Trick Flow 351w R series EFI manifold upper and lower NEW In BOX NEVER installed
  • Hizdudeness
  • Mar 6, 2024
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
2
Views
3K
Engine and Power Adder Mar 6, 2024
Hizdudeness
H
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?