• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Heads For Perfomer Intake

  • Thread starter Thread starter southjersey5.0
  • Start date Start date Apr 6, 2014

southjersey5.0

New Member
Apr 6, 2014
1
0
2
Apr 6, 2014
#1
  • Apr 6, 2014
  • #1
hello, new to the forum. was wondering what heads would work best for stock cam and edelbrock perfomer upper/lower as well as all the basic bolt ons. shes a street and occasional track
 

gearheadboy

15 Year Member
Jan 15, 2003
1,425
177
84
Greencastle Pa
Apr 7, 2014
#2
  • Apr 7, 2014
  • #2
If you have the heads off, you are a few bolts from the cam. Or 1.7 rockers on the stock cam to help get the thing to work with your intake. As far as heads I like AFR 165's but they cost the same as anything else. Good moderate street/strip head. Pick what you want but match the whole set-up. Work around the intake since you have it and it will work well for your needs?
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Apr 7, 2014
#3
  • Apr 7, 2014
  • #3
Afr 165,tfs 170-190cc,gt40's any of these will work/flow better than the performer intake. I like trick flows the best. And I def would upgrade the cam if I already was throwing on aftermarket heads/intake. It's all about the combination of parts. You don't have to go crazy with the cam profile though. A good everyday performance off the shelf cam would be tfs1,comp cam 264,etc. a custom cam from somebody like FlowTech Inductions,Etc is ideal.
 
Reactions: Sfv50h

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Apr 7, 2014
#4
  • Apr 7, 2014
  • #4
what are your goals
stick or automatic
what is your budget
what gears in the rear

That being said, a tried and true combo is this

TW 170 heads
lsx springs from FTI
Tom Moss ported exlorer lower
FTI cam

easy 300-330 rwhp with the appropriate MAF, TB, injectors, exhaust
 
Reactions: Sfv50h

Sfv50h

New Member
Apr 7, 2014
8
0
2
California
Apr 7, 2014
#5
  • Apr 7, 2014
  • #5
I havea 88 5.0 wanted to upgrade my heads thinking afi or trickflow 165 its an aod with 373 gears. thinking of getting a custom cam and victor x manifold but i wana go forced induction on it in te future...i dont wana buy head twice..should i get the 185 afi or stick with 165cc any help and info will be great thanks
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Apr 8, 2014
#6
  • Apr 8, 2014
  • #6
A lot of people like the tfs topend kit. FYI the valve angle on tfs heads give a little more ptv clearance So you can run a little more cam than with Afr heads. What kind of forced induction? Turbo? Blower? Afr 185 heads have some ptv clearance issues over the tfs heads. I really really like the new tfs 11r 190cc heads. They come with top of the line PAC springs,bigger valves,locks&retainers,etc. Your ultimate goals should determine what head you go with. If you truly plan on making a lot of hp go with the bigger head(185-205cc). If it's going to always be more street than race you can go with the smaller cc alum heads. Just remember the entire package has to be designed to work together. Mismatched parts can make an under performing car.
 
Reactions: Sfv50h, 89oem and mikestang63

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Apr 8, 2014
#7
  • Apr 8, 2014
  • #7
Welcome to STANGNET!! Where are you located in South Jersey?
 

Sfv50h

New Member
Apr 7, 2014
8
0
2
California
Apr 8, 2014
#8
  • Apr 8, 2014
  • #8
custom cams are a bit away from my price range so thinking of a x or f cam and not sure im trying to stay away from a lot of fab work so maybe the on3 turbo kit or a used paxton not trying to yank tire but hold my own on the street i drive the car maybe once a week if im lucky ...my friend said 165 cc are good for under 500hp...But the power adder wont be going in any time soon. so i wanted something i can use for both applications
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Rpm vs rpm2
  • thor347
  • Mar 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
238
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 19, 2025
thor347
T
Engine Catch Can or not?
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
316
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 6, 2026
ctandc
C
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
663
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
197
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?