• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Heidts or TCP?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gomz66
  • Start date Start date Oct 19, 2006
G

gomz66

New Member
May 14, 2006
2
0
0
Oct 19, 2006
#1
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #1
I have a 66 mustang in which I would like to install my 411hp, 351W motor into but I need to upgrade my suspension, both front and rear. I also need a lead on where I can locate a Griffin 7-565BC-Fax alum. radiator w/trans cooler. I already have installed a 4w disc brake master booter from MPower. I heard that some one named dolphin was working on a coilover kit but I don't know much about it.
 
G

gsxrken

Member
Sep 12, 2005
206
1
18
Weschester County, NY
Oct 19, 2006
#2
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #2
The Heidts/Mustang II requires major, irreversible surgery to the car and transmits stresses to the so-called frame rails instead of sharing them with the shock tower and firewall.
Since a 351W fits in the early cars without shock tower elimination, my vote is that you pursue any one of the tubular heim-jointed control arm setups out their from TCP, Global West, Ron Morris, or RRS.
I don't know anyone who races or does serious HPDE days with the Mustang II setup... (and you know they would if it was better).
 

Stangninjak

Member
Apr 16, 2004
324
2
19
Oct 19, 2006
#3
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #3
Go with a rack system or maybe a new Box. I just purches a rack kit from Unisteer as I'm doing the exact same thing. Did a lot of research, opentracker has good stuff, another route may be the Fatman susp setup, it depends on your budget and how far you want to go with it.

The MII setup requires you moving the engine foward or thats what I heard, so I was not trying to go that route. I went with the rack kit from Unisteer due to my budget on this project, and other things I wanted to get done. See my Unisteer thread for more info.

In the end, its what you want and how you want to get there. I think for me, my option will work just fine, and then I will get to the back of the car.
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Oct 19, 2006
#4
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #4
gsxrken said:
Since a 351W fits in the early cars without shock tower elimination, my vote is that you pursue any one of the tubular heim-jointed control arm setups out their
Click to expand...

I agree! The only real reason to do the swap is to gain room for a modular motor or a big block. There may be a little higher initial cost for the bolt on tubular set-ups, but you need to really consider the installed price! If you're doing it yourself and have a good amount of time, Heidt's could be a viable option if the room is needed.
 

yeloxr7

Member
Apr 18, 2005
429
0
16
Oct 20, 2006
#5
  • Oct 20, 2006
  • #5
Remember that the Fatman kit is basically a hardware-and-bracket kit. When you buy this, you still need to get a rack-and-pinion, hubs, bearings, rotors and calipers.
 
K

kbelusa

New Member
Apr 15, 2006
19
0
0
Toronto, Canada
Jul 25, 2007
#6
  • Jul 25, 2007
  • #6
Not only that, but with the TCP kit, the stock metal is reatined, possibly increasing the value of your car in the eyes of apprasers. I just installed the TCP front, rear coilover and steering rack and love it. The install was easy and everything, pretty much lined up.
My problem now is I need to widden my engine bay. anyone know how to notch a shock tower by 2-3" a side above the Shelby (1"lower) upper control arm mounting possition? teh engine I am using is 31" wide. Shock towers - 26"-27"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
11
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Yesterday at 11:10 PM
revhead347
M
SOLD 1993 Ford Mustang GT
  • Middleagecrisis
  • Aug 8, 2022
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
3K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Aug 21, 2022
Middleagecrisis
M
Spent 3 hours trying to figure out converting my jelly jar M/C to a dual reservoir M/C on my a-code '65 disc/drum
  • 1320stang
  • Sep 7, 2021
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 19, 2023
GOvert
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?