• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Help me with 351w build ideas!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter str8stang036
  • Start date Start date Aug 31, 2004

str8stang036

New Member
Dec 28, 2002
1,382
0
0
Miami
Aug 31, 2004
#1
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #1
I am currently in the process of building my 351w. I want it to make atleast 500rwhp with boost or nitrous. But I dont know if I should stick with the 351w or do a 393 stroker.

If I stick with the 351w I would forge everything and go with low comp pistons for boost or nitrious.

If I do the 393 can I still do low comp pistons, and is it worth it?

Whats the better deal?
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Aug 31, 2004
#2
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #2
I'd personally stick with a cast crank. Just make sure you go through a lot of heat cycles before you give it hell. I'll probably get flamed b/c of that but that's JMO. Don't go with a scat crank tho if you go cast. They moved there plant across the whale pond and now they are much crappier than before. Go with Eagle. It does take a hell of a lot to brake a crank. Most of the roundy round guys I know do cast and they don't break as much as one would think. Bad cranks will usually net them 6 or 7 nites but if you think about it they have there cars at WOT for minutes not seconds. I'd personally go with n2o b/c of the cost and a stroker. The extra cubes are definately worth it.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Sep 1, 2004
#3
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #3
giddyup306 said:
Don't go with a scat crank tho if you go cast. They moved there plant across the whale pond and now they are much crappier than before.
Click to expand...

Wasnt that "CAT" cranks, the cheapies you see on ebay?

I would just jump in head-first and build a 500hp N/A 408. If you're trying to save bucks, then going that route probably isnt feasible since the forged crank, rods, pistons and big induction will cost. I see it this way; boost the 351, or do a N/A stroker.
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Sep 1, 2004
#4
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #4
No I am talking about the Scat cranks. They are made in Tawian. A good friend of mine owns a machine shop and claims they aren't nearly as strong as the old ones. BTW he builds dozens of IMCA cars a year and races himself so he see how durable these things are. He showed me a "new and improved scat crank" and you could tell just by looking at it that it was economized.
 

str8stang036

New Member
Dec 28, 2002
1,382
0
0
Miami
Sep 3, 2004
#5
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #5
I was looking at the 9000 series crank from scat which is like stock replacement for a 351w but stronger, and one from eagle but its also stock 351w. Is it worth paying a little more for a forged crank? Also, how much will the hp will the stock crank hold?
 
S

SmockDoiley

New Member
Jun 14, 2003
1,591
2
0
San Diego, CA
Sep 3, 2004
#6
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #6
First off, a stroker kit for a 351 is no more than for a 302. They can be had, fully forged for $1400 and a grand for cast. As for going with a forged crank, its not needed since it would be stronger than the block and thats pointless. A stock cast crank and block can withstand 700+ horses. Also, you dont need a 351 or a lot of boost to get 500+ rwhp. I barely tried and with a 12 lb. 342 I made 516 at the wheels at only 4900 before have fuel issues. Imagine what it would have made at 6000k! And as for torque is was making 570 at 4350. But if you still want to go with a 351 remember that an N/A stroker will easily make 500 and be far cheaper than a power adder. Also, you can use a 392 crank, stock 351 rods and stock 302 pistons and have a 392 for pennies. If you can find a running 351, save the rods, get the crank for $300-400 and get some cast or hyper 302 pistons for practically free for building a stroker for almost free. Your 392 with AFR heads will make the power you need and since you dont need a power adder, you wont need the forged pistons. Most people will argue about that, but they can KMA since people here love bragging rights. Forged pistons are NOT needed unless you are running 10.5 or more comp or a power adder. Also remember that you can easily surpass the safe zone by combining a power adder with a stroker. I had a 700 horse combo with out of the box trickflow heads and an X-303 cam, D-1 procharger and 342 cubes. Its that easy so remember that. Forged cranks arent needs, forged pistons arent needed for NA setups and cubes arent needed if your boosting. A great plan if you ask me is the cheap 392 I spoke of but with forged pistons and then buy my D-1 intercooled setup with many parts worth $4200 for $2500. With AFR 205 heads you'd be in the 600+ rwhp range for about $3500 for the long block and $2500 for my blower.
 
S

SmockDoiley

New Member
Jun 14, 2003
1,591
2
0
San Diego, CA
Sep 3, 2004
#7
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #7
Remember, there is a reason most stroker kits come with cast cranks because except for extreme cases its totally fine. Its funny that most people bitch that you need a forged crank and race block. Yet DSS, one of the best engine builder/sellers in the country use factory blocks and cranks up to 600 horses for their 302 based combos.
 
S

SmockDoiley

New Member
Jun 14, 2003
1,591
2
0
San Diego, CA
Sep 3, 2004
#8
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #8
For a budget setup, use a new 392 cast crank, 351 stock block, stock 351 rods, stock 302 pistons which are forged, and Vic Jr heads since they flow just as well as AFRs but only cost $1300. This will net about 10 to 1 comp, be NA, make 500 to the wheels, and be totally streetable. A long block could be done for under $3000 if major machining isnt needed or the block is standard bore.
 
S

SmockDoiley

New Member
Jun 14, 2003
1,591
2
0
San Diego, CA
Sep 3, 2004
#9
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #9
And actually, the money you save in doing the budget factory 392, you could use towards a new roller 351 sportsman block which is stronger and again really lets you use factory 302 pistons for like $50 or something off of Ebay.
 

str8stang036

New Member
Dec 28, 2002
1,382
0
0
Miami
Sep 3, 2004
#10
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #10
I understand what your telling me, but I think I am going to stick with the 351 boosted. I am going to use the stock crank, but get some forged rods and pistons for the boost and the Vic Jr heads. What do you think that will make.
 

5.0 HOtrain

Founding Member
May 20, 2001
2,247
0
47
New Hampshire
Sep 3, 2004
#11
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #11
The only problem I see with boost on a stock crank with a centrefugal super charger is the added stress from the blower pulley. Stock cranks break at the snout from the stress, fact not fiction.
mike.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
351w stroked to 408 CARB
  • Ric4eyedFox
  • Mar 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
670
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 22, 2025
General karthief
R
Progress Thread 351w stroker rotating assembly and build
  • Ric4eyedFox
  • Mar 23, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
858
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2025
Noobz347
Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
637
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
Progress Thread 351w Build, 67 Coupe
  • redstang67
  • Oct 4, 2024
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
340
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Oct 5, 2024
89ripper
Engine HELP - 351W Based Build Under Stock Hood
  • thinkfaster
  • Oct 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?