• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

HELP MY BRAKES SUCK

  • Thread starter Thread starter Demolisher
  • Start date Start date May 28, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Car Nut

Founding Member
Jul 6, 2000
1,176
1
37
Snellville, Georgia (Atlanta area)
May 29, 2007
#21
  • May 29, 2007
  • #21
I have almost no brake dive when fully mashing the brake pedal to the floor. See my sig for a total explanation.

Here's the short of it with some details:

Good braking can always be had if you have decent pads, acceptable tire tread depth, fresh brake fluid, and no worn out suspension parts.

Brake dive........nothing helps better than stiffer springs. Another major help is C/C plates. My spring rates are 750/850 in the front compared to the stockers at somewhere near 400/475. A Mach 1 or Bullitt has 600 springs, but they dive a whole lot more than my H&R springs. I wouldn't recommend my springs for a daily driver UNTIL you've had a chance to ride in someone else's stang who has them. I love them and they're not to harsh, but they aint' no caddy either. To me, I'll take a slight bit of harshness to dramatically increase the safety and handling benefits in an emergency situation.

I did the cobra brake kit well after my suspension upgrades. I've always replaced my brake fluid every 12 months. Bad tire tread depth can be a nightmare, even with a ton of brake mods. My braking was much better with the new suspension, but it didn't feel totally safe until I got the whole brake system upgraded.

I can only recommend what I've got installed. What my sig doesn't tell you is that I've got good tread depth, properly inflated tires (checked weekly), and brake fluid that is never more than 12 months old.

I say all that to state that even a stock brake setup could be made to do a good job. Suspension upgrades just help everything out in this area. Subframe connectors should be considered too.
 

Car Nut

Founding Member
Jul 6, 2000
1,176
1
37
Snellville, Georgia (Atlanta area)
May 29, 2007
#22
  • May 29, 2007
  • #22
gcomfx.com said:
Enjoy the read:

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=680239
Click to expand...

Good article.

I should have mentioned that I bought all my brake stuff from Performance Parts Inc. www.performancepartsinc.com

PPI was great and everything in the kit was brand new. Still looks gorgeous over a year later and couldn't be happier. The kits were really all inclusive and had every nut and bolt.
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
May 29, 2007
#23
  • May 29, 2007
  • #23
Pokageek said:
"all that stuff helps, but not as much as a good set of caster/camber plates."

Bmmertech, can yo uexplain how this helps? I had not heard this before. Thanks.
Click to expand...

well first off you have to understand that the front roll center on stangs is much lower than the rear. this creates a roll axis that angles down from the rear to front. when you push the brakes the car goes towards the lower part of the roll axis. on a lowered car this can actually get worse. the front roll center can be below the surface of the ground and the rear can be up in the trunk.

added caster(via plates or revised control arms/k-members) will raise the front roll center enough to help level out the roll axis. also add a panhard bar that helps lower the rear roll center and you should have a close to level roll axis. this also helps the way the vehicle leans during conering.

if you have ever driven a bmw(if i remeber you have an E60) then you will notice that it has a lot less brake dive and can also use much bigger rear brakes. this is because they have a much better roll axis via superior(read costlier) engineering.

caster also helps out in so many other areas. one of note is camber gain. on our cars if you have less than 4 deg pos caster(factory is around 3) you will actually produce positive camber when you turn the wheels. with added caster you will finally gain negative camber when turning the wheel. this allows you to run less static camber and still have negative camber when you need it.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
May 29, 2007
#24
  • May 29, 2007
  • #24
gcomfx.com said:
Enjoy the read:

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=680239
Click to expand...

Nuff said. I wont order from them.

"well first off you have to understand that the front roll center on stangs is much lower than the rear. this creates a roll axis that angles down from the rear to front. when you push the brakes the car goes towards the lower part of the roll axis. on a lowered car this can actually get worse. the front roll center can be below the surface of the ground and the rear can be up in the trunk.

added caster(via plates or revised control arms/k-members) will raise the front roll center enough to help level out the roll axis. also add a panhard bar that helps lower the rear roll center and you should have a close to level roll axis. this also helps the way the vehicle leans during conering.

if you have ever driven a bmw(if i remeber you have an E60) then you will notice that it has a lot less brake dive and can also use much bigger rear brakes. this is because they have a much better roll axis via superior(read costlier) engineering.

caster also helps out in so many other areas. one of note is camber gain. on our cars if you have less than 4 deg pos caster(factory is around 3) you will actually produce positive camber when you turn the wheels. with added caster you will finally gain negative camber when turning the wheel. this allows you to run less static camber and still have negative camber when you need it." - bimmertech

Thanks man. I had no idea our cars were egineered that way. Yes, my E60 brakes INCREDIBLE. Best braking I have ever had on a car.
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
May 29, 2007
#25
  • May 29, 2007
  • #25
Pokageek said:
Thanks man. I had no idea our cars were egineered that way. Yes, my E60 brakes INCREDIBLE. Best braking I have ever had on a car.
Click to expand...

i have a total brake fetish--weird, i know. good thing is i can fulfill it daily. i have driven alot of higher end cars in my day and i still think bmw has some of the best brakes around. what is really mind blowing is they do it all with usually half(or less) the amount of pistons in the calipers. its amazing what a well sorted out suspension/chassis can do for braking dynamics.

another cool thing about bmw's is that most use dual pivot lower control arms which actually causes the track width to be wider than the fender openings. i can go on for days.....
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
May 29, 2007
#26
  • May 29, 2007
  • #26
Now if only they made a good looking car to go along with all that engineering... Sorry, I've just never liked the way a BMW looks. They have that Hitler moustache looking grille to me. Give me a Benz anyday based on looks, although I have heard many first hand accounts that a BMW is a better car, hands down.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
May 29, 2007
#27
  • May 29, 2007
  • #27
bimmertech said:
i have a total brake fetish--weird, i know. good thing is i can fulfill it daily. i have driven alot of higher end cars in my day and i still think bmw has some of the best brakes around. what is really mind blowing is they do it all with usually half(or less) the amount of pistons in the calipers. its amazing what a well sorted out suspension/chassis can do for braking dynamics.

another cool thing about bmw's is that most use dual pivot lower control arms which actually causes the track width to be wider than the fender openings. i can go on for days.....
Click to expand...

Yes. And since we are on the subject, how about the perfect 50/50 weight ratio! I still want to get a bumper sticker that says "I'd rather be drivin my Ford" but I like the car. And yes Benz is JUNK JUNK JUNK. Owned one. Hated it.
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
May 29, 2007
#28
  • May 29, 2007
  • #28
mb's are not drivers cars. i will say i like the looks of alot of them, but that is where it stops.

just a comparo, but a 02 e55 amg has 8 piston front calipers/4 piston rears weighs the same as an 02 M5 that has 1 piston calipers all the way around yet the M5 has a shorter stopping distance.
 

SN95StangMan

New Member
Jul 5, 2003
1,292
0
0
Lynwood, CA
May 30, 2007
#29
  • May 30, 2007
  • #29
bimmertech said:
mb's are not drivers cars. i will say i like the looks of alot of them, but that is where it stops.

just a comparo, but a 02 e55 amg has 8 piston front calipers/4 piston rears weighs the same as an 02 M5 that has 1 piston calipers all the way around yet the M5 has a shorter stopping distance.
Click to expand...
yeah, but those 8 piston calipers look cool as hell

 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
May 30, 2007
#30
  • May 30, 2007
  • #30
I think MB's are facinating and rock in the performance area. But they are not DD in my o based on the problems I have had and many others I know..like the rotors seemingly always getting warped (at least mine) and the dam rear window clips always breaking, and several other "issues" always putting the car in the shop.

As to the hitler comment on the bimmers . That is about the biggest insult I have ever heard on a car, lol. And I just don't see it at all. They are great looking cars. Jags are too.

Back to brakes, the worst so far are my uncles buick regal brakes. Maybe it is after getting out of my bmer...no they seemed worse than the stangs brakes now that I think about it, O and my MB had like...alien brakes lol. The emergency brakes in the rear..if I remember correctly had its OWN little set or brake pads and disk within the main disks!!
 

Engel

Member
Apr 2, 2005
219
0
16
Currently Fort Walton Beach
Jun 2, 2007
#31
  • Jun 2, 2007
  • #31
ok all we need now in this thread is some good brake ****

somone post up those 8 piston calipers lol






i love the bmw suspension, but i am not a big fan of the looks either
 

go-stang5.0

New Member
Jan 27, 2003
2,244
0
0
Glenview,Il
Jun 3, 2007
#32
  • Jun 3, 2007
  • #32
I know firsthand what you are talking about bimmertech. My buddy has a e30 318 with a pretty much stock brake system. He runs pagid blue pads (which are quite streetable) and his pads last 2x as long as mine on on an equivalent amount of track days. I have the cobra setup up front and the 13" baer rear upgrade and I was running carbotech panther pluses (front) which were much more agressive than his pads and he was still braking about as well as I was. Thats with a phb and my steeda CC plates maxed out on caster. Man I need a torque arm .
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Wheels-Tires Need Some Help - Brakes Upgrade/Wheel fitment
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
81
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2026
AeroCoupe
Electrical Issues with my 2006 mustang gt
  • VerneVdV
  • May 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
81
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech May 22, 2026
VerneVdV
F
5 lug disc brake pad help
  • Foxrider714
  • Nov 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
236
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2025
KRUISR
Parking brake cable
  • 78 Mach1
  • Apr 21, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
4
Views
365
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Apr 30, 2025
78 Mach1
A
Resolved Brake light switch
  • Alabama
  • Feb 24, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 25, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?