• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Help - Not Much Info on Shorty Headers

  • Thread starter Thread starter DawgStang
  • Start date Start date Jan 11, 2010

DawgStang

New Member
Apr 26, 2003
19
0
0
Atlanta, GA
Jan 11, 2010
#1
  • Jan 11, 2010
  • #1
I've searched the forums and can't seem to find much info on shorty headers. The two posts that I DID find were negative. So the question is: With a stock H-midpipe, would a $300+ investment in shorty headers be worth it?
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Jan 11, 2010
#2
  • Jan 11, 2010
  • #2
You didn't find much because the power gains are minimal, while the labor and cost are relatively high. This makes the modification not worth your while. If you are going to go through the trouble of installing different header, definately go with long tubes. The gains are quite substantial across the power band.
 

DawgStang

New Member
Apr 26, 2003
19
0
0
Atlanta, GA
Jan 11, 2010
#3
  • Jan 11, 2010
  • #3
Ok, so we're looking at LTs plus a shorty mid-pipe, of which I'd definitely go for an X. Looks like the bang for the buck just got cut in half. Thanks for the input, bhuff.
 

trombonedemon

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2009
1,962
39
59
U.S.A, U.S.A., U.S.A.!
Jan 11, 2010
#4
  • Jan 11, 2010
  • #4
So whats the difference between the Stock Exhaust manifold and shorty headers?
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Jan 11, 2010
#5
  • Jan 11, 2010
  • #5
Bang for the buck will be much higher with the long tubes. The shortys wouldn't give more than about 3hp and that would be at higher rpms where it isn't that usable. Long tubes on the other hand give 15+ hp and ft*lbs of torque which makes the power band broader and sweeter. After all, it is torque that makes a car feel fun.

But personally, I'd save all that money for a supercharger. With what you would spend on long tubes and installation, you'll be well on your way to a blower.

Edit, as for the difference between the stock manifolds and headers... the stock manifold is some ugly stamped steel (I think?) collector that looks inefficient and poorly designed. Shorty headers will have actual tubes that come to a collector and mount up in the exact same location, giving a very minor power gain. To make a complicated thing simpler, the diameter and length of the primarys affects the efficient operating range. Long tube headers would promote mid range torque, while shorties just aren't ideal for any rpm that the 4.6 can run, plus being too small.
 
I

Icemanstang

New Member
Dec 28, 2009
149
0
0
Potstown,Pennsylvania
Jan 12, 2010
#6
  • Jan 12, 2010
  • #6
You won't gain alot from shorty headers don't waste your money.
Longtube headers are the best bang for the buck.
 

Blackone51

Member
Oct 30, 2008
201
2
16
Jan 12, 2010
#7
  • Jan 12, 2010
  • #7
Don't long tubes create an issue with clearance when your car is lowered. A fellow engineer at work has a sick turbo camaro with long tubes and it's slammed, he said if he could do it all over again he would have went with shorties. I don't know if mustangs are the same or different but when I put my ported and polished heads on my 98 gt I took his advice and just went with the shorties, I couldn't stand that scraping and banging for an extra 8 to 10 hp gain. I'm D1SC pro charged so I guess I don't need that extra little bit.
 

deftsound

Please ask me how much my supercharger cost
Apr 6, 2004
945
1
39
Texas City TX
Jan 12, 2010
#8
  • Jan 12, 2010
  • #8
Shortys are a waste of money. Longtubes are where its at.

And yea longtubes could create a clearence issue depending on what your setup is. As long as your car isnt too slammed it will be fine though. The only time ive bottomed out on my headers is going over speed bumps.

LS1's have more issues with header clearence than mustangs. I think its because they have longer frames than the mustangs..
 

Stark77

Member
Jun 11, 2008
501
0
16
Tallahassee, FL
Jan 12, 2010
#9
  • Jan 12, 2010
  • #9
Forget about the shorties and go longtubes. They actually produce gains that are visible on a dyno chart - unlike the shorty's - and if you find a shop that knows what they're doing you can get it installed quick. Labor on my install was $250. My driver side header scrapes, just barely, and not even enough to see any scrape damage on the header itself. If you get one that bolts up instead of a weld-on set up then you can fix any damage that may result by just re-tightening the bolts/flange.
 

DawgStang

New Member
Apr 26, 2003
19
0
0
Atlanta, GA
Jan 12, 2010
#10
  • Jan 12, 2010
  • #10
Appreciated, guys. I'll give up on the shorties and just grab a 70mm TB/plenum combo instead... LTs will have to wait a while...
 

32ValveRom

Member
Feb 15, 2009
328
0
17
Fl
Jan 12, 2010
#11
  • Jan 12, 2010
  • #11
Stark77 said:
Forget about the shorties and go longtubes. They actually produce gains that are visible on a dyno chart - unlike the shorty's - and if you find a shop that knows what they're doing you can get it installed quick. Labor on my install was $250. My driver side header scrapes, just barely, and not even enough to see any scrape damage on the header itself. If you get one that bolts up instead of a weld-on set up then you can fix any damage that may result by just re-tightening the bolts/flange.
Click to expand...

Is your car lowered?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
bbk shorty header to mid pipe gasket
  • randyyy
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
328
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 29, 2025
randyyy
R
S
Engine 2003 Mach 1 Automatic Upgrades assistance
  • SJK1417M1AT
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
264
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 21, 2025
01SVTvertt
0
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
667
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
Gt40 e303 combo questions
  • 99mustanggt2018
  • Mar 30, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
414
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Mar 30, 2025
KRUISR
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?