• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

help on pistons and piston rings for 351W?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nitequill
  • Start date Start date Jan 8, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
N

nitequill

New Member
Sep 2, 2005
45
0
0
Los Angeles
Jan 8, 2007
#1
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #1
Hello guys im rebuilding my first engine and need help on pistons and piston rings for 74” 351W? First should I replace my pistons? Is this nessacery? They look to be in good shape; second piston rings, I was watching a do it yourself video and the guy was using Keith Black rings which needed to be filed to fit. Is there any rings that I could buy that do not require me to file them? Or do I even need to replace my rings?
 

gt500lw

New Member
Aug 22, 2005
18
0
1
Jan 8, 2007
#2
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #2
If the pistons look ok than you don't need to replace them. Depends on what you are doing with the car. As far as the rings go...I never used the rings you are talking about, and I had never heard of filing down the rings to fit.

If you have bored the cylinders out at all than you would need new pistons and appropriate rings.
 

classic boost

Founding Member
Feb 3, 1999
709
0
0
canton, oh
Jan 8, 2007
#3
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #3
gt500lw said:
... and I had never heard of filing down the rings to fit.
Click to expand...

seriously?!? umm, very common. ALL rings should be checked and filed if needed.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jan 8, 2007
#4
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #4
it is mire than just the pistons that need inspection, the cylinder bores also need checking for taper and out of round. more than about .005" of either and you really should bore the cylinders to make them straight and round again.

for piston rings, if you choose to use the same pistons, you can get a set of rings that dont need gapping per say. but as indicated you do need to check the ring gaps to see if they are in spec.

gt500lw there are two types of rings sold, those that are gapped close to spec from the factory, and those that need gapping as they are designed to be custom gapped by the engine builder.
 
N

nitequill

New Member
Sep 2, 2005
45
0
0
Los Angeles
Jan 8, 2007
#5
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #5
If the rings need to be gapped, is there a standard I should follow?
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jan 8, 2007
#6
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #6
nitequill said:
If the rings need to be gapped, is there a standard I should follow?
Click to expand...

yes there is a spec for ring gap. any repair manual worth anything will give you the spec you need.
 
N

nitequill

New Member
Sep 2, 2005
45
0
0
Los Angeles
Jan 8, 2007
#7
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #7
thanks
 

classic boost

Founding Member
Feb 3, 1999
709
0
0
canton, oh
Jan 8, 2007
#8
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #8
the instructions included with the rings will give you the specs.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Jan 8, 2007
#9
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #9
If you don't put in new rings and refresh the crank and bores to some extent, you are not rebuilding the engine.
You are just disassembling it and putting it back together.

Now, I am going to offer some advice since you are working on a 351w...

Instead of turning the crank, pay just a little more and get a cast 3.85" stroke crank.
Then, instead of buying new 351 pistons in .030" over, buy cheaper 302 pistons in .030" over. (get the block cleaned up .030" over, of course)

These two mods will go back together just as stock, however you will have about 42 more cubic inches. 393w instead of 351w for only slightly more dough than turning a crank and using 351 pistons.

Dave
 

jb1dsl

Member
May 24, 2004
566
0
17
Marianna, Fl.
Jan 9, 2007
#10
  • Jan 9, 2007
  • #10
ratio,
Does the block have to be clearenced for this setup?
 

milner351

Founding Member
Jun 12, 2002
92
0
0
The Motor City
Jan 9, 2007
#11
  • Jan 9, 2007
  • #11
Nope!

I have a scat 3.85 crank, I went with DSS pro lite pistons and H beam rods for this combination, but, even with a stock 351w rod and stock replacement 302 piston, you don't have to worry about grinding the block.... at least I didn't.
 

Italian-LX

Member
Dec 9, 2002
970
0
16
Anniston, AL
Jan 9, 2007
#12
  • Jan 9, 2007
  • #12
milner351 said:
Nope!

I have a scat 3.85 crank, I went with DSS pro lite pistons and H beam rods for this combination, but, even with a stock 351w rod and stock replacement 302 piston, you don't have to worry about grinding the block.... at least I didn't.
Click to expand...
I agree.

I just finished my 351w with a 4.100" stroke and my block didn't need clearing. My block is a D2 (1972).
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Jan 9, 2007
#13
  • Jan 9, 2007
  • #13
milner351 said:
Nope!

I have a scat 3.85 crank, I went with DSS pro lite pistons and H beam rods for this combination, but, even with a stock 351w rod and stock replacement 302 piston, you don't have to worry about grinding the block.... at least I didn't.
Click to expand...
The beauty of this particular stroker is that it only adds a little to the cost of a stock rebuild...
I see you took it to the max though!
 

classic boost

Founding Member
Feb 3, 1999
709
0
0
canton, oh
Jan 10, 2007
#14
  • Jan 10, 2007
  • #14
if he's not upgrading heads, intake, and cam, then the 393 route isn't that good of an idea. the engine will hit a wall before 4,000 rpms.
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Jan 10, 2007
#15
  • Jan 10, 2007
  • #15
but it will be a torque monster off idle, lol.
 

classic boost

Founding Member
Feb 3, 1999
709
0
0
canton, oh
Jan 10, 2007
#16
  • Jan 10, 2007
  • #16
302 coupe said:
but it will be a torque monster off idle, lol.
Click to expand...

if he's going to pull a camper with his stang, he'll be on the right track.
 
N

nitequill

New Member
Sep 2, 2005
45
0
0
Los Angeles
Jan 10, 2007
#17
  • Jan 10, 2007
  • #17
my 351w is going to be a daily driver, i upgraded the carb, intake and cam slightly but not much... i dont want to pull a camper and not trying to beat everyone on the street just the 350 buick butthead friends of mine
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Jan 10, 2007
#18
  • Jan 10, 2007
  • #18
paul302 said:
if he's not upgrading heads, intake, and cam, then the 393 route isn't that good of an idea. the engine will hit a wall before 4,000 rpms.
Click to expand...
I don't agree.
40+ more cubes for maybe 200 extra bux on the rebuild...
Can't beat it.
If you keep a 2v and stock cam on a 351 it hits that same wall.
So what's the difference?
By your reasoning, they never should have used the 289/302 design and made the 351w to begin with.
Most of them had heads, cam, exhaust, and intake same-same as any smogged 302.
Agree?
 

gt500lw

New Member
Aug 22, 2005
18
0
1
Jan 10, 2007
#19
  • Jan 10, 2007
  • #19
Hey, go back to this gapping thing. I have built about four engines (new rings and all that good stuff). I have also helped my dad rebuild engines. He has been a mechanic for over thirty years. This is the first time I ever heard about gapping your rings, other than checking the gap of the old rings that you are pulling out.
 

Italian-LX

Member
Dec 9, 2002
970
0
16
Anniston, AL
Jan 10, 2007
#20
  • Jan 10, 2007
  • #20
gt500lw said:
Hey, go back to this gapping thing. I have built about four engines (new rings and all that good stuff). I have also helped my dad rebuild engines. He has been a mechanic for over thirty years. This is the first time I ever heard about gapping your rings, other than checking the gap of the old rings that you are pulling out.
Click to expand...
Who picked your rings out? Certainly anybody who has done any kind of ring "shopping" has heard of file-fit rings.

Ask your machinist -- I bet he has heard of them.

. . . if not, then you may want to find yourself a different person to do your machine work.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
New Edge 3.8L Forged Internals
  • NtheGAME
  • Jun 1, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
760
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jun 3, 2025
Noobz347
I
2000 GT Mustang - Transmission Cooler to Radiator o-rings
  • Iwarrior
  • Oct 4, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
158
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 4, 2025
Iwarrior
I
Engine Forged flat top pistons from 5.0 fit a 351 build?
  • PonyGTrider
  • May 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
PonyGTrider
Motor given to me and I’d like to rebuild it what do I need to do
  • Creomod
  • Dec 14, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
373
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 16, 2024
AeroCoupe
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
220
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?