• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Help Reaching 600rwhp

  • Thread starter Thread starter projectfiveo
  • Start date Start date Jul 30, 2014
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
P

projectfiveo

Member
Aug 30, 2005
347
0
17
Jul 30, 2014
#1
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #1
Ok I think I've got the motor I want planned out for a coupe build. I'm open to any suggestions and if you have this setup be sure to let me know hp it put down. My goal is to get as close to 600rwhp as I can get. Will this setup even come close?

•Dart shp block
•Scat 331 stroker kit
•Afr 185 aluminum heads
•Custom grind cam
•Race ported upper and lower GT40 intake
•On3 turbo kit
•1.7 roller rockers
•75mm throttle body
•42lb injectors

 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,034
1,625
194
NJ
Jul 30, 2014
#2
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #2
You will need more than 42lb injectors.
The intake ported or not is a restriction, you could still get there, but me personally i'd use a better intake.

I would use a better turbo kit too. There is no such thing as a cheap 600rwhp setup. When the numbers start to get that high you really need to have the best parts to keep it reliable or all you will be doing is building a $15,000 time bomb.
 

Onefine88

Previously 89SSC18
10 Year Member
Aug 3, 2006
1,422
796
154
Jul 30, 2014
#3
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #3
I agree that the intake is gonna hold you back.
 

f8tlfiveo

My wife likes my spool and blow-off valve.
Aug 8, 2007
1,585
102
64
Lancaster, PA
Jul 30, 2014
#4
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #4
I think the power level is achievable the way you sit now, you will need to run more boost to use that intake though. If you use a better flowing intake you put less stress on your turbo and head gaskets with a lower boost level.
 
P

projectfiveo

Member
Aug 30, 2005
347
0
17
Jul 30, 2014
#5
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #5
What kinda intake you recommend?
 

Onefine88

Previously 89SSC18
10 Year Member
Aug 3, 2006
1,422
796
154
Jul 30, 2014
#6
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #6
projectfiveo said:
What kinda intake you recommend?
Click to expand...
If it were me, I'd use a Holley Systemax or a Edelbrock RPM II.
 
Reactions: 2000xp8

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,034
1,625
194
NJ
Jul 30, 2014
#7
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #7
You want to keep restriction as low as possible.
The less restriction, the less boost, the less trouble.
 
P

projectfiveo

Member
Aug 30, 2005
347
0
17
Jul 30, 2014
#8
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #8
Yea after re thinking that I will probably just go with RPM II intake.
 
P

projectfiveo

Member
Aug 30, 2005
347
0
17
Jul 30, 2014
#9
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #9
Another quick question. I've got another 89 hatch car that i want to have a little fun in. I know this route isn't going to be no where close to 600hp but what kinda numbers you think this setup would bring?

Explorer gt40 motor
Stock mustang forged pistons
Afr 185 heads
1.7 roller rockers
Custom cam
RPM II intake
Full bolt ons
Long tube headers
X pipe
3" exhaust to turn downs
Maybe a 75-100 shot
 
Last edited: Jul 30, 2014
P

projectfiveo

Member
Aug 30, 2005
347
0
17
Jul 30, 2014
#10
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • #10
Bump
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,034
1,625
194
NJ
Jul 31, 2014
#11
  • Jul 31, 2014
  • #11
I don't think 185's work with stock pistons.
 

Sharad

ALWAYS choose the V over the P!!! Wait... what?
Jan 5, 2011
1,562
480
94
Fort Myers, Florida
Jul 31, 2014
#12
  • Jul 31, 2014
  • #12
I'd go with a ProCharged Coyote swap. Quick, easy, powerful, reliable, good fuel economy!
 
Reactions: projectfiveo
P

projectfiveo

Member
Aug 30, 2005
347
0
17
Jul 31, 2014
#13
  • Jul 31, 2014
  • #13
If I had that much money to dish out at one time I'd be all over it lol
 
J

jka

5 Year Member
Jan 17, 2010
339
23
29
Jul 31, 2014
#14
  • Jul 31, 2014
  • #14
Are you planning to just race or drive it on the street or both?
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jul 31, 2014
#15
  • Jul 31, 2014
  • #15
Not sure why you would stick with a 302 based Windsor to make that power figure?

I'd scrap the dart block altogether, pick up a production 351w and punch it out to 393/408+ cubic inches and have at it.

You'll be replacing every conceivable component from the original 302 to build up the dart block anyway, so why not just buy the 351W specific components instead? It seems an like a lot of additional work and cost for nothing to limit ones self to only 331ci of displacement and rely on huge amounts of boost to make up the difference? The production 351W block has already proven capable of withstanding power levels into the 1,000hp range, so why spend the same amount on just a dart block, that you could on a complete 400+ cubic inch, pump gas friendly short block....and hit your goal with more conservative boost levels?

Work smarter, not harder.
 
Reactions: projectfiveo
P

projectfiveo

Member
Aug 30, 2005
347
0
17
Jul 31, 2014
#16
  • Jul 31, 2014
  • #16
It's gonna be a street car with occasional racing. Haven't done much research on the 351 block. What's a good vehicle and year to get one out of? So you would recommend a 351 block over a 331 stroker? Only thing I've ever heard about the 351 is they are too heavy. But then again like I said I've not done much research.
 
P

projectfiveo

Member
Aug 30, 2005
347
0
17
Jul 31, 2014
#17
  • Jul 31, 2014
  • #17
How much horsepower could I get out of a 351 with no boost? Just heads, cam, intake and boltons?
 
J

jka

5 Year Member
Jan 17, 2010
339
23
29
Aug 1, 2014
#18
  • Aug 1, 2014
  • #18
Why not buy a good blueprint crate 347 engine that comes with 415hp ...it cost $4000.00 from jegs it comes with a good warranty. Then if you want to you can throw a 150 shot at it. How much are you trying to spend because to make 600hp will cost you.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,034
1,625
194
NJ
Aug 1, 2014
#19
  • Aug 1, 2014
  • #19
There are many different ways of getting good power.

Just be realistic with your finances.
You don't want to be one of these dreamers that starts something and lands up selling it off as parts for half what you paid.

600rwhp is EXPENSIVE. No matter how you slice it, it ain't going to be cheap.
The trans, rear, engine, power adder are going to cost quite a bit, let's not forget brakes, fuel system and suspension. If you don't have all these parts already, i wouldn't be surprised if the build costed 20 grand.

Keeping your goals below 500rwhp and staying NA could save you an absolute ton of money.

A good NA 347 or 351 will make between 425-500rwhp (351 based), done with a well thought out setup consisting of quality parts.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 1, 2014
#20
  • Aug 1, 2014
  • #20
projectfiveo said:
It's gonna be a street car with occasional racing. Haven't done much research on the 351 block. What's a good vehicle and year to get one out of? So you would recommend a 351 block over a 331 stroker? Only thing I've ever heard about the 351 is they are too heavy. But then again like I said I've not done much research.
Click to expand...


Coming from someone who's currently running a 331, I'll tell ya....I can't help but feel I should have built a 408W.

Don't get me wrong, the 331 is a screamer and definitely a big step up from a 302, but on the street....torque is king and with the additional cubes, a stroked and poked 351W has it in spades.

With a good H/C/I set up, you could make 450-500hp N/A with a stroked 351W without killing your wallet like you would with a dart build and with a lot less effort than you could starting with a 302.
 
Reactions: projectfiveo
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SOLD Sold.
  • TTSaleen
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
6
Views
316
Engine and Power Adder Jul 2, 2026
Noobz347
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
522
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
J
Engine LOSS OF POWER AT 4,000 RPM.
  • Jarhead67
  • Nov 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 25, 2025
Jarhead67
J
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
949
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
TTSaleen's Foxbody Project
  • TTSaleen
  • Apr 28, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 17, 2026
TTSaleen
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?