• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Help with injectors size suggestions

  • Thread starter Thread starter BelueLX
  • Start date Start date Oct 30, 2007

BelueLX

Founding Member
Jul 10, 1999
1,195
1
0
Oct 30, 2007
#1
  • Oct 30, 2007
  • #1
My car came with 30# injectors in it. I figured they were a little too big before I even heard it run. It is a .040 over 302... has ported and polished '69 model 351 heads, unknown camshaft, ported and welded intake manifold, 75mm TB, full exhaust, roller rockers. It runs strong, but puts out a lot of smoke at WOT. Will it do any damage to keep these injectors in my car, or should i just swap the sampling tube and drop in 24# injectors? The smoke it puts out is ridiculous at 6000rpm.
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Oct 30, 2007
#2
  • Oct 30, 2007
  • #2
i'm going through the same delema. i have 24# injectors on my car, and even with the mods in my sig they're still too big. my tuner leaned my car out as much as he could and my a/f is still 10.0:1. i JUST got done rebuilding some 19# injectors that i'm about to throw in with a 70mm mass air meter. hopefully that'll fix my a/f and give me back a bit of power. from what people have told me on here, 19# injectors are good up to about 350hp. from what you've listed, you're car is probably no where near that. so if you're keeping it n/a, some 19# injectors should be plenty. if there's more to your car than you listed, 24#er's might be what you need. whats your a/f at right now?
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Oct 30, 2007
#3
  • Oct 30, 2007
  • #3
Injector HP ratings: divide flow rating by.5 and multiply the result by the number of injectors. This uses a 100% duty cycle. These ratings are for naturally aspirated engines.

Example:
19/.5 = 38, 38 x 8 = 304 HP
24/.5 = 48, 48 x 8 = 384 HP
30/.5 = 60, 60 x 8 = 480 HP
36/.5 = 72, 72 x 8 = 576 HP
42/.5 = 84, 84 x 8 = 672 HP

The preferred duty cycle is about 85% maximum, so for a safety factor multiply the final figure times .85.

304 HP x .85 = 258 HP
385 HP x .85 = 326 HP
480 HP x .85 = 408 HP
576 HP x .85 = 490 HP
672 HP x .85 = 571 HP

Remember that the above ratings are at 39 PSI. Increasing the pressure will effectively increase the flow rating. Example: a 19 lb injector will flow 24 lbs at 63 PSI, and a 24 lb injector will flow 30 lbs at 63 PSI.

See http://users.erols.com/srweiss/ to get the calculators used in these examples.
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Oct 30, 2007
#4
  • Oct 30, 2007
  • #4
I agree that the 30's are way to big and the 24's will suffice also ditch the C&L Meter for a PMAS 75/24 unit
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Oct 30, 2007
#5
  • Oct 30, 2007
  • #5
Your 30's are fine. Any issues you can thank your "calibrated" mass air meter for.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Oct 30, 2007
#6
  • Oct 30, 2007
  • #6
The larger your injectors, the further you get away from you stock computer's tune for 19 lb injectors.

Follow Jrichker's chart!

24 lb injectors would be plenty.

Killercanary, on this site, only ran 82% duty cycle with 24 lb injectors on his stroker with nearly 360rwhp. He uses a very accurate computer tuning device that is even more accurate than those little hand held devices.

Good Luck.
 
D

DREAMZOFHIRPM

New Member
Sep 25, 2007
40
0
0
BROOOOOOOKLYNN
Oct 30, 2007
#7
  • Oct 30, 2007
  • #7
i had a c&l and a pmas..the pmas wires came undone from the harness but before it got screwed up it was good,,, the c&l was garbage man,,,, straight garbage
 
N

n2o-89fox

New Member
Oct 8, 2007
116
0
0
ca
Oct 31, 2007
#8
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #8
according to the injector calculator you could in theory swap out your 19# injectors at 38 psi for some 24#'s at 24 psi and it would run the same???
 

BelueLX

Founding Member
Jul 10, 1999
1,195
1
0
Oct 31, 2007
#9
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #9
My meter is an old school Pro-M bullet. Im sure thats just as bad as a C&L.
 

BelueLX

Founding Member
Jul 10, 1999
1,195
1
0
Oct 31, 2007
#10
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #10
I guess its a pmas sensor, it says Pro-M on it. I actually bought it 7 years ago and sold it only to get it back on a car I bought. I guess he had it recalibrated for the 30s... maybe thats why its so rich I ordered it for the 19s back then.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Oct 31, 2007
#11
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #11
n2o-89fox said:
according to the injector calculator you could in theory swap out your 19# injectors at 38 psi for some 24#'s at 24 psi and it would run the same???
Click to expand...

Nope, it would give you the same fuel delivery potential I imagine, but it needs some degree of pressure. Maybe Jrichker will be able to explain it for us...

The computer (so I have heard) likes to see 38-40 psi of fuel pressure at the regulator.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Oct 31, 2007
#12
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #12
n2o-89fox said:
according to the injector calculator you could in theory swap out your 19# injectors at 38 psi for some 24#'s at 24 psi and it would run the same???
Click to expand...

In theory, yes.
The problem is that as pressure drops off, so does the spray pattern. Lower pressures tend to make the injectors "dribble" and have poor atomization of fuel. This can have a negative effect on performance at low intake port velocities. Typical case would be flooring the throttle at 30 MPH in 4th gear. You may encounter a stumble in acceleration until the airflow through the intake ports picks up enough speed to help atomize the fuel.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Oct 31, 2007
#13
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #13
jrichker said:
In theory, yes.
The problem is that as pressure drops off, so does the spray pattern. Lower pressures tend to make the injectors "dribble" and have poor atomization of fuel. This can have a negative effect on performance at low intake port velocities. Typical case would be flooring the throttle at 30 MPH in 4th gear. You may encounter a stumble in acceleration until the airflow through the intake ports picks up enough speed to help atomize the fuel.
Click to expand...

Thank you for clearing that up...
 
N

n2o-89fox

New Member
Oct 8, 2007
116
0
0
ca
Oct 31, 2007
#14
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #14
jrichker said:
In theory, yes.
The problem is that as pressure drops off, so does the spray pattern. Lower pressures tend to make the injectors "dribble" and have poor atomization of fuel. This can have a negative effect on performance at low intake port velocities. Typical case would be flooring the throttle at 30 MPH in 4th gear. You may encounter a stumble in acceleration until the airflow through the intake ports picks up enough speed to help atomize the fuel.
Click to expand...

Sorry for hi jacking this thread but I have one more question. So if you were to do it ( lower pressure, bigger injector) the only problem that might happen is when you go wot from really low rpms in a high gear? Would drivablilty be comprimised? The reason I ask is because I bought a maf sensor out of a 94 cobra that said it was calibrated for the 24 injectors which come to find out it is the same one that comes in the gt and is calibrated for the 19's and the cobras computer makes the adjustments. I ordered some 24's to go along with the maf because when I removed my 19's they were all cracked to *****. I just want to be able to make the 24's work without buying a calibrated maf or some new 19's. I just need this to work until i get the money for the tweecer so I can program the car for the 24's.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Oct 31, 2007
#15
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #15
n2o-89fox said:
Sorry for hi jacking this thread but I have one more question. So if you were to do it ( lower pressure, bigger injector) the only problem that might happen is when you go wot from really low rpms in a high gear? Would drivablilty be comprimised? The reason I ask is because I bought a maf sensor out of a 94 cobra that said it was calibrated for the 24 injectors which come to find out it is the same one that comes in the gt and is calibrated for the 19's and the cobras computer makes the adjustments. I ordered some 24's to go along with the maf because when I removed my 19's they were all cracked to *****. I just want to be able to make the 24's work without buying a calibrated maf or some new 19's. I just need this to work until i get the money for the tweecer so I can program the car for the 24's.
Click to expand...

What I described is a drivability problem. Your problems may be similar or not.
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Oct 31, 2007
#16
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #16
with the combo descibed by the original poster i would run 19s, they will feed it just fine.

IMO i wouldnt even mess with injectors without a tune. me and friends of mine have had nothing but problems when trying to add bigger injectors with a "calibrated" meter.

the EEC from the factory thinks it's running 19s and it WILL continue to think it does until you tune/ get a tune telling it otherwise.

the calibrated meters do nothing more than fool the engine into thinking its getting less air that it really is. so it will try to dump in less fuel. but with a higher flowing injector it would "in theory" get the right amount of fuel. but this isnt the case. its a bandaid fix and jacks with load% in the EEC and it will use the incorrect spark advance/retard tables. for example it would think it was at 70%load when it could infact be at 90%

if someone spends enough money and etc to get out of the capabilities of the stock 19s then its HIGHLY advised to get a tune or tune it yourself to make sure the fuel it needs. there is no other way to FOR SURE know the fuel is correct. the stock EEC is tuned for a BONE STOCK engine.

even a mild bolt ons/exhaust 5.0 could benefit slightly from computer tuning, it would be a waste of time because those mods dont really affect anything but the fuel delivery could be optimized slightly. nothing you could feel but you get the point. as mods get into bigger heads and cam and intake, the car will benefit alot more from a tune. a blown car will really benefit from some tuning.

a mild HCI combo could benefit from a tune but it might not be worth it really. if the person plans to keep on modding i would wait until the car is considered complete or close to it. a more elaborate HCI like 200cc heads and big cam could probably benefit greatly seeing how they can ingest more fuel.
 

BelueLX

Founding Member
Jul 10, 1999
1,195
1
0
Nov 1, 2007
#17
  • Nov 1, 2007
  • #17
Thanks for the info there were some really good points here. I've ran 24s with 396whp but that was with an FMU (another bandaid). I might see if the local dyno will let me run on the 30s then swap out for 19s and a friends MAF and compare the number and A/F and only charge me for 3 runs. Shouldn't take more than an hour.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Engine 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
501
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 28, 2025
Mustang5L5
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
716
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Saturday at 9:06 AM
gray owl
G
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
T
Engine 306 to 331
  • Treachery
  • Jul 1, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 2, 2020
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?