• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Here is a non-traditional intake? How/Why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter moneypit94
  • Start date Start date Jun 23, 2004

moneypit94

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,723
2
39
Macomb, IL
Jun 23, 2004
#1
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #1
I have seen saleen intakes before but this one is a little different...

Can someone help explain?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=7907269575&category=36474

View attachment 524568

8 extra injectors... why and how?
 

VIPERn94Five-0

Founding Member
Apr 28, 2002
3,352
2
58
Poughkeepsie, NY
Jun 23, 2004
#2
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #2
would be sick ass to inject nitrous oxide in through there...i guess it would work...


Anthony
 

moneypit94

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,723
2
39
Macomb, IL
Jun 23, 2004
#3
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #3
i thought about nitrous... But why go through all the added hassle.. just put a normal Fogger system on?
 

VIPERn94Five-0

Founding Member
Apr 28, 2002
3,352
2
58
Poughkeepsie, NY
Jun 23, 2004
#4
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #4
good point, but it would still be sick....anyways....

....Edelbrock makes an Intake manifold for sport compacts(Integra B18's to be exact) that is part of their turbo kit...well the intake manifold comes with holes for 4 extra fuel injectors to help with fuel starvation....but i dont see why you would inject the extra fuel that way in our cars...

Anthony
 

89MustangGX

I have nothing productive to add!
Jul 3, 2001
10,262
1
0
Mill Creek, WA
Jun 23, 2004
#5
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #5
That's an original Saleen intake, it bolts to a truck style lower. It actually made really good power back in the day, but some of the other intakes based off similar designs (they look similar even!) will flow better. I believe that version above with the extra fuel injector bosses is called the "shootout" version. It was to allow extra fuel. This is from quite a while ago though.
 

Mrgreen94gt

SIMMA DA NA!!!
Founding Member
Jul 16, 2002
448
0
0
West TN
Jun 23, 2004
#6
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #6
That could also be used to make that side's fuel rail and injectors more "easy access."
 

moneypit94

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,723
2
39
Macomb, IL
Jun 23, 2004
#7
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #7
well from his discription it sounds like he had them drilled and put on there... And yeah i thought about finding a truck lower or even a holley systemax II lower and matching that up with it and trying to sell it... But i think the extra fuel rail and stuff would not sell well?
 

5.0_GT_kid

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 18, 2004
1,155
1
39
Largo, Florida
Jun 23, 2004
#8
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #8
Looks just like a Holley to me
 

moneypit94

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,723
2
39
Macomb, IL
Jun 23, 2004
#9
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #9
5.0_GT_kid said:
Looks just like a Holley to me
Click to expand...
yes the holley and the saleen intakes are very simular... But have you ever seen one with a fuel rail w/ 8 injectors mounted to the upper intake...

My question is trying to tune that thing would have to be twice as complicated and probably be expencive.. you are better off buying a low impedence driver and putting huge fuel injectors on if your having problems with getting enough fuel..
 

5.0_GT_kid

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 18, 2004
1,155
1
39
Largo, Florida
Jun 23, 2004
#10
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #10
moneypit94 said:
yes the holley and the saleen intakes are very simular... But have you ever seen one with a fuel rail w/ 8 injectors mounted to the upper intake...

My question is trying to tune that thing would have to be twice as complicated and probably be expencive.. you are better off buying a low impedence driver and putting huge fuel injectors on if your having problems with getting enough fuel..
Click to expand...

I meant just the manifold itself.

But no, I have never seen one with the injectors like that and I'm sure it's a nightmare in more ways than one
 

89MustangGX

I have nothing productive to add!
Jul 3, 2001
10,262
1
0
Mill Creek, WA
Jun 23, 2004
#11
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #11
It's my understanding that Holley/Weiand bought the rights to the intake and modified it and began producing their own version (including lower) -- which is improved. The Saleen/Vortech is the first of that style and came out long before the others. It never sold well because it was about $700, and that wasn't polished like in the picture.

The intake would have probably come with just the "bosses" for the injectors and he would have had to have them drilled and setup for the injectors, so that may be true. As I mentioned, I believe it's called the "shootout" version -- it's the one that had those bosses on it.

This is also back in the day before all kinds of fancy electronics and such that you can practically go to Walmart and buy, so it was a way for cars that needed alot of fuel to get that extra fuel. It was a great idea at the time, just expensive to make work. Nowadays you don't need that type of setup.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Jun 23, 2004
#12
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #12
89MustangGX said:
It's my understanding that Holley/Weiand bought the rights to the intake and modified it and began producing their own version (including lower) -- which is improved. The Saleen/Vortech is the first of that style and came out long before the others. It never sold well because it was about $700, and that wasn't polished like in the picture.

The intake would have probably come with just the "bosses" for the injectors and he would have had to have them drilled and setup for the injectors, so that may be true. As I mentioned, I believe it's called the "shootout" version -- it's the one that had those bosses on it.

This is also back in the day before all kinds of fancy electronics and such that you can practically go to Walmart and buy, so it was a way for cars that needed alot of fuel to get that extra fuel. It was a great idea at the time, just expensive to make work. Nowadays you don't need that type of setup.
Click to expand...


Your dead on! I know a guy that still runs this intake setup with the extra injectors. This setup was VERY hard to tune and led to some catastophic failures when things went amiss. Had I seen this post before I went to the track, I could have taken a pic of another friend of mine with the same intake, only not drilled. There are small circels cats into the aluminum which can then be drilled and tapped. The newer intakes are much better in design.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Resolved 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
612
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Today at 12:37 PM
fasterthangas
F
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
562
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
A
95 Gt intermittent backfire
  • A_A_Ron
  • May 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
422
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2025
A_A_Ron
A
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?