• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Hey Multimeter Gurus

  • Thread starter Thread starter allz28
  • Start date Start date Jun 14, 2010

allz28

New Member
Apr 17, 2010
11
0
0
Jun 14, 2010
#1
  • Jun 14, 2010
  • #1
Any suggestions on a good, easy-to-use, digital multimeter?

I'm a beginner and will mostly use it on cars.

While cheaper is better, I'm willing to spend money on a good one.

Also, anyone know of some good resources to teach yourself how to use one real well? (websites, books, etc.)

Thanks.
 

pedro

Founding Member
May 20, 2001
432
6
29
Jun 14, 2010
#2
  • Jun 14, 2010
  • #2
I bought a $10 multimeter from Autozone and has worked wonders. I just use it occasionally for the Stang and my DD Cavalier, though.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Jun 14, 2010
#3
  • Jun 14, 2010
  • #3
Check out eBay for a DMM. I got a used Fluke 27 (high end meter, ruggedized, auto ranges and great accuracy). cost me $37 shipped to my door. It had some dings and scratches, but it works great. The cost for the same model new was over $400.

Fluke and Tripplet are two of the best brands.
 

1991notchbackLX

Active Member
Dec 25, 2007
1,483
47
48
New York
Jun 14, 2010
#4
  • Jun 14, 2010
  • #4
+1 for a Fluke meter. I have a few and they're all great tools. They last forever and give reliable readings.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,167
17,860
224
Massachusetts
Jun 14, 2010
#5
  • Jun 14, 2010
  • #5
Another vote for a used fluke off bay
 

nisreo

New Member
Jul 22, 2006
178
0
0
Jun 14, 2010
#6
  • Jun 14, 2010
  • #6
yup go with fluke. I have an 88V but I need it for work, so dont go crazy for just home use.
 

Stever89

5 Year Member
Dec 14, 2009
536
9
39
Biloxi, MS
Jun 15, 2010
#7
  • Jun 15, 2010
  • #7
I write electronic calibration procedures for Nasa, DMMs amongst many other items. It's true, Fluke is the "end all be all" for multimeters, they're the most durable and accurate.

DMMs do many things these days, but for automotive use, you'll probably be using the VDC and continuity functions the most. Those can be found on meters that don't cost nearly as much. If you can find a deal on a Fluke, by all means pick it up. I don't know about you, but finding a real deal on fleabay isn't what it used to be, seems like everyone knows what's up these days.

I've got a Fluke 87 and and a 77, but I also have one from Radio Shack that's just as good for automotive use, and damn near as accurate. The only differences are the readout takes maybe a half-second longer to to display, and it's not as rugged.

Flukes are great, but they're not indestructible. I dropped one from 5 levels up on a Space Shuttle engine stand. It exploded when it hit the deck.
 

aar0s

Founding Member
Dec 20, 1998
1,015
55
69
Jun 15, 2010
#8
  • Jun 15, 2010
  • #8
Stever89 said:
I write electronic calibration procedures for Nasa, DMMs amongst many other items. It's true, Fluke is the "end all be all" for multimeters, they're the most durable and accurate.

DMMs do many things these days, but for automotive use, you'll probably be using the VDC and continuity functions the most. Those can be found on meters that don't cost nearly as much. If you can find a deal on a Fluke, by all means pick it up. I don't know about you, but finding a real deal on fleabay isn't what it used to be, seems like everyone knows what's up these days.

I've got a Fluke 87 and and a 77, but I also have one from Radio Shack that's just as good for automotive use, and damn near as accurate. The only differences are the readout takes maybe a half-second longer to to display, and it's not as rugged.

Flukes are great, but they're not indestructible. I dropped one from 5 levels up on a Space Shuttle engine stand. It exploded when it hit the deck.
Click to expand...
You, sir, probably have one of the coolest of all jobs.
damnit, ive been watching some flukes on eBay and now this thread pops up and prices go up
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Sticky
Free Beta Access: Tool I Built to Hunt Fox Bodies Faster
  • MRaburn
  • Mar 6, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
397
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 7, 2026
FastDriver
L
05GT brakes on a 98GT?
  • lparsons42
  • Sep 6, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
158
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 6, 2025
lparsons42
L
Stand alone vs chip tune (for noob)
  • nicholase
  • Jan 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
44
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2025
Noobz347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
J
Fox body - godzilla, coyote, or 408w stroker - Best route for budget build?
  • jaygee15
  • Jan 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 30, 2025
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?