• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Hi Volt COPs

  • Thread starter Thread starter jfleetwo
  • Start date Start date May 14, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
J

jfleetwo

New Member
Mar 30, 2009
11
0
0
Kansas
May 14, 2009
#1
  • May 14, 2009
  • #1
The June issue of Mod Mustangs & Fords has an article on pg 76 testing the results of some high voltage COPs on a 08 GT/CS with CAI and tune as the only listed mod. The results showed an increase of 27 HP on the dyno. I have seen several comments here that have said that these COPs only make a difference on an engine with power adders. I'd like to know if anybody else has experiences like with this kind of mod. $500.00 with 1 hour labor resulting in 27 HP increase is nothing to sneeze at. Thanks
 

squeak93

15 Year Member
Jun 2, 2005
2,253
358
164
Joplin, Missouri
May 14, 2009
#2
  • May 14, 2009
  • #2
Prob just the dyno... most 2v guys don't see chit unless they have a power adder. (My car had screaming deamon's on it and I don't notice anything crazy).
 
S

SFC.Kill

New Member
Jan 26, 2009
55
0
0
Parker Ford, PA
May 14, 2009
#3
  • May 14, 2009
  • #3
Do it yourself. Puts alittle more pride in your ride....lol
 

Silverstang02GT

New Member
Sep 30, 2002
60
0
0
Ft. Myers FL
May 14, 2009
#4
  • May 14, 2009
  • #4
I have Granatelli COP and did not notice much of a difference if any.
 
J

jfleetwo

New Member
Mar 30, 2009
11
0
0
Kansas
May 14, 2009
#5
  • May 14, 2009
  • #5
In the magazine article they were testing a set of Granatelli Extreme COPs on Granatelli's dyno at the Granatelli shop. The car happened to have a Granatelli CAI too. I hope that's not the only reason they got such an amazing result.
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
May 15, 2009
#6
  • May 15, 2009
  • #6
jfleetwo said:
In the magazine article they were testing a set of Granatelli Extreme COPs on Granatelli's dyno at the Granatelli shop. The car happened to have a Granatelli CAI too. I hope that's not the only reason they got such an amazing result.
Click to expand...

what kind of dyno were they using? you can manipulate numbers on dynojets fairly easy, a friend that does tuning for Evos was showing me what he can do to change numbers for magazine articles.
 
J

jfleetwo

New Member
Mar 30, 2009
11
0
0
Kansas
May 15, 2009
#7
  • May 15, 2009
  • #7
for BDCardinal

In the article they specifically said it wasn't on a dynojet but on a Ford Chassis Dyno. I'm not familiar with the name but they did want it known that they weren't using a dynojet.
 

DBMSTNG

I fantasize about it being BIG!
Founding Member
Apr 23, 2002
2,120
0
56
not quite here
May 15, 2009
#8
  • May 15, 2009
  • #8
what they probably did was run a base tune, then run an optimized tune to make it look like the COPs made a difference.

it's crap like this why i no longer subscribe to MMFF
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
May 15, 2009
#9
  • May 15, 2009
  • #9
jfleetwo said:
for BDCardinal

In the article they specifically said it wasn't on a dynojet but on a Ford Chassis Dyno. I'm not familiar with the name but they did want it known that they weren't using a dynojet.
Click to expand...

no such dyno. they might be talking about a Mustang Dyno, which are even easier to fool since you can change the weights of the cars.
 
S

spederman

Member
Apr 13, 2005
732
0
16
May 15, 2009
#10
  • May 15, 2009
  • #10
one of the the other forums had like a 100 page thread about the GMS COP's when they first came out and from what i remember, i think they were no significant gains to justify the $500.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
May 16, 2009
#11
  • May 16, 2009
  • #11
my stock COP's are fine at 750 rwhp
 
J

jfleetwo

New Member
Mar 30, 2009
11
0
0
Kansas
May 16, 2009
#12
  • May 16, 2009
  • #12
Well... I'm disappointed to say the least. My other hobby is wood working and I have found almost all product reviews in my woodworking magazines to be dead on. I'm guessing that these car magazine reviews are driven by the advertisers.
 
B

blubullett

Member
Jun 22, 2006
535
6
18
Modesto, CA
May 17, 2009
#13
  • May 17, 2009
  • #13
I have the granetellis. When they are on the car I get a miss around 5500. With the stock Ford ones its fine to redline. Figured that out on the dyno one day. Don't waste your money unless you get the MSD or Accell ones.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
May 17, 2009
#14
  • May 17, 2009
  • #14
I don't really like bashing, but I have a buddy with a blown Bullitt that was experiencing mis-fires with his GMS coil packs. Factory Motorcrafts cleared the problem up instantaniously.

27hp from coil packs is not gonna happen unless the stockers are mis-firing very badly.
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
May 19, 2009
#15
  • May 19, 2009
  • #15
A better article is the one in 5.0 Mustangs and Super Fords, July 09 issue, pages 110 - 118. Not owning an S197, I didn't bother reading the entire article, but of note is the dyno results (a Dynojet) using an 06 GT as the victim. They added a Corsa axleback exhaust, GMS COILS, GMS Pulleys, GMS CAI, Diablo Tune, and Nitrous. The baseline was 268 HP, 295 ft lbs of torque. After adding the exhaust, the numbers were 272/299. Adding GMS coils to the mix, it went to 276/302. Then they added pulleys to get to 284/306 and finally the GMS CAI to reach 283/298. Adding a Diablo Tuner got them to 292/307 before they added the juice. So, with this collection of mostly GMS aftermarket parts, they surely spent some serious coin and gained a total of 23 HP / 12 ft/lbs of torque (without the nitrous). Note that when they added the GMS coils the output increased a whopping 4 HP / 3 ft lbs of torque. Another note - when they added the GMS CAI, they lost 1 HP and, more importantly, 8 ft lbs of torque. To me, these appear to be honest, real world numbers...don't trust the manufacturer's ads with their dyno results that you'll often see and, quite frankly, you can't trust most of the magazine 'tests' either.
 
G

Granatelli

New Member
Jan 30, 2008
2
0
0
Jul 17, 2009
#16
  • Jul 17, 2009
  • #16
twogts4us said:
A better article is the one in 5.0 Mustangs and Super Fords, July 09 issue, pages 110 - 118. Not owning an S197, I didn't bother reading the entire article, but of note is the dyno results (a Dynojet) using an 06 GT as the victim. They added a Corsa axleback exhaust, GMS COILS, GMS Pulleys, GMS CAI, Diablo Tune, and Nitrous. The baseline was 268 HP, 295 ft lbs of torque. After adding the exhaust, the numbers were 272/299. Adding GMS coils to the mix, it went to 276/302. Then they added pulleys to get to 284/306 and finally the GMS CAI to reach 283/298. Adding a Diablo Tuner got them to 292/307 before they added the juice. So, with this collection of mostly GMS aftermarket parts, they surely spent some serious coin and gained a total of 23 HP / 12 ft/lbs of torque (without the nitrous). Note that when they added the GMS coils the output increased a whopping 4 HP / 3 ft lbs of torque. Another note - when they added the GMS CAI, they lost 1 HP and, more importantly, 8 ft lbs of torque. To me, these appear to be honest, real world numbers...don't trust the manufacturer's ads with their dyno results that you'll often see and, quite frankly, you can't trust most of the magazine 'tests' either.
Click to expand...

So, if I read your post correctly, if the vehicle looses power it most be real but if it gains it is just a fluke or fabrication? How cynical is that. This article was written by KJ Jones. He has tested the GMS coils a number of time on a number of vehicles, both N/A and Forced Fed. Granatelli never claimed the coils would make 20plus HP on an otherwise stock car - but I guess on that day on that dyno they did. I thought it was a crazy number and I made that clear to everyone from day one.

The sad truth here is if they reported a loss of 25hp everyone would have been more then happy to believe that - go figure

Now on to the CAI - the article was written to make the Diablo look like it was the hero. So please note the Granatelli Cold Air Intake combined with the Diablo Tune only made an increase of 8hp and 1 ft/lb. That should be more of a sad representation on Diablo’s part then GMS. Or perhaps the shop that did the dyno work. They are asking us to believe that the GMS cold air and a flash tune could only gain 8hp and no torque increase - I am not pointing the figure here but even the biggest Granatelli haters would agree a honk'n intake pipe and a custom tune should have made more like 20hp not 8. Different dynos on different days will report different results -
 
B

blubullett

Member
Jun 22, 2006
535
6
18
Modesto, CA
Jul 17, 2009
#17
  • Jul 17, 2009
  • #17
Nice revival of an old thread Granatelli. I like how you didn't respond to my post or Burning Rubbers post. Thats how your 400 dollar rip offs really work. Go wreak your pro car again. And stop ripping people off.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Jul 18, 2009
#18
  • Jul 18, 2009
  • #18
granetelli parts suck. i've never heard a single good review.

most of them are ripoffs of other companies parts
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Jul 23, 2009
#19
  • Jul 23, 2009
  • #19
Granatelli said:
So, if I read your post correctly, if the vehicle looses power it most be real but if it gains it is just a fluke or fabrication? How cynical is that.
Click to expand...

Quite cynical I agree, but this is fueled by companies like yours (and you aren't the only one) who claim big HP gains but, in the real world, they don't materialize. The fact of the matter is this - Aftermarket vendors will do anything they can to create a single run with a larger than life HP gain and then advertise that. Will anyone else be able to create that kind of HP gain? Not likely... But the race is on, and every manufacturer is trying to beat the competition.

Granatelli said:
This article was written by KJ Jones. He has tested the GMS coils a number of time on a number of vehicles, both N/A and Forced Fed.
Click to expand...

Pointless information.

Granatelli said:
Granatelli never claimed the coils would make 20plus HP on an otherwise stock car - but I guess on that day on that dyno they did. I thought it was a crazy number and I made that clear to everyone from day one.
Click to expand...

No, not 20HP, but right from your website, the Pro Series COPS, "Adds 12HP (normally aspirated) & 25HP (s/c, turbo, & nitrous)". And where do you get that it was your coils that made a 20plus HP gain? It was a combination of parts that created that overall gain, not just your coils.

Granatelli said:
The sad truth here is if they reported a loss of 25hp everyone would have been more then happy to believe that - go figure
Click to expand...

Yep, 'cause everyone hates Granatelli. You fuel that hatred yourself by proclaiming to be persecuted by the Mustang crowd (I dunno, maybe the GM folks also hate you?). You routinely deny the fact that some of your parts have been pure junk. I recall a thread a couple years ago with a guy that had your LCAs that literally folded in half. Instead of working with him to remedy the problem, you publicly cast doubt whether the parts were yours or not. If it were me, I would have called the guy and worked it out rather than continuing a 'bad taste in your mouth' thread that engaged way more people than I'd bet you really wanted. Didn't matter though...you kept on publicly ranting. There comes a time when you should take the conversation offline.

Granatelli said:
Now on to the CAI - the article was written to make the Diablo look like it was the hero. So please note the Granatelli Cold Air Intake combined with the Diablo Tune only made an increase of 8hp and 1 ft/lb. That should be more of a sad representation on Diablo’s part then GMS. Or perhaps the shop that did the dyno work. They are asking us to believe that the GMS cold air and a flash tune could only gain 8hp and no torque increase - I am not pointing the figure here but even the biggest Granatelli haters would agree a honk'n intake pipe and a custom tune should have made more like 20hp not 8. Different dynos on different days will report different results -
Click to expand...

What makes you believe a "honk'n intake pipe and a custom tune" would gain 20 HP? And what part of that gain would you equate to the "honk'n intake pipe"? Surely if you lean out a motor enough you could gain some decent HP, but at what expense?

But really, what is the 'magic' behind a big intake pipe? It's similiar to the buzz about using a bigger MAF. Jeez, I could make a MAF out of a piece of PVC. In the end, these are just oversized breathing tubes. Do they help? Somewhat, but there is a point where you lose intake velocity and thereby lose power.

And of course "different dynos on different days will report different results". No one would dispute that. But typically, you'd expect to get very similar #s from the same dyno. I wasn't aware...did they use different dynos?
Lastly, I can't believe you dug this old thread up over 2 months after it was originally posted. Why bother? Do you feel that you are helping the Granatelli brand?
 
B

blubullett

Member
Jun 22, 2006
535
6
18
Modesto, CA
Jul 23, 2009
#20
  • Jul 23, 2009
  • #20
I sent my last message as a PM too. I bet he never responds. I feel for all the people who don't know better and buy his parts.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Electrical New Codes 29/98/66 - wont run unless MAF unplugged (all volt and ohms checked at maf)
  • cablegod
  • Nov 5, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2022
nickyb
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
P
For Sale 1996 Vortech Supercharged Cobra Convertible 80K Miles for sale - many upgrades - $10,500
  • pimpfish
  • Oct 24, 2018
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
2K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Dec 28, 2018
pimpfish
P
Need Help, Car Wont Start, I've Gone Through Both Checklists
  • 93silverlx50
  • Jul 22, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
54
Views
12K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 30, 2019
General karthief
Magnaflow Exhaust For The 2015 Mustang Gt
  • 84Ttop
  • Nov 14, 2014
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
24K
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Mar 6, 2015
justinakajuice
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?