• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Hit 148-149 mph in stock '02 GT auto conv!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter tornatic!!
  • Start date Start date Jan 14, 2007
Status
Not open for further replies.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
T

tornatic!!

New Member
Mar 27, 2006
7
0
0
Savannah, Ga
Jan 14, 2007
#1
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #1
A couple of months ago on a cool sunday morning I decided to take a little drive in my GT. When I got onto Veterans Pwky. there was no car in sight so I decided to see how fast she could go. I had hit 143 before on I-95 but she acted like she couldn't go any faster so I shut it down. That sunday though as I reached 143 the tach kept climbing!! I seen the speedo hit somewhere around 148-149 before I had to slow down coming up on a curve in the road. Talk about an adrenaline rush!!

I mean my '02 GT is bone stock to the filter. To top it off it's an auto and convertible. Before yall call B.S. I'm at sea level here in Savannah and it was a very cool morning. I think I could've reached 150+ if I had a little more straight road. So to all yall 99-04 auto GT owners our cars are capable of 150+ stock at least at sea level.

P.S. There were no other cars on the road. I was only endangering myself.
 

Ernad

celibate sans pants
Apr 2, 2004
0
1
0
Grand Rapids, MI
Jan 14, 2007
#2
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #2
And our insurance rates.
 
J

jimfitzgerald

New Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,672
0
0
Jan 14, 2007
#3
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #3
Stupid.
 

steveb24

New Member
Nov 28, 2005
555
0
0
wilmington, DE
Jan 14, 2007
#4
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #4
jimfitzgerald said:
Stupid.
Click to expand...

idk.. i dont think so as long as he knows he is endangering himself. i reached about that in the lehigh valley tunnel (great place to top out)
 

player4lifeov

New Member
Mar 22, 2006
39
0
0
California
Jan 14, 2007
#5
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #5
Well you know that our speedometers aren't perfect so you probally hit 145......but i could be wrong
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jan 14, 2007
#6
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #6
Atleast you had the sence to do it when noone was around. Thats when I hit 148MPH myself...5 AM noone in front of me.
Sure its dangerous, but as long as you dont make a habbit of it, then I dont see much of a problem with it.

And man im surpirsed your car did that....mine was moving slowly past about 145 and that was with 248RWHP @ 600" elevation. Up to that point it was moving fast...mainly because I was going downward until around 145 HAHA.
 

steveb24

New Member
Nov 28, 2005
555
0
0
wilmington, DE
Jan 14, 2007
#7
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #7
when u guys went all out did you use 5th gear? i was under the impression that 4th was the max speed and i had my 3.27's at the time and i hit about 148, which was at 6300 rpm..i hit my limiter, but it was pulling hard thanx to the cams and whatever else. im wondering how much more it has in it/ if any, in 5th gear.
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jan 14, 2007
#8
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #8
5th gear here...3.73 gears
 

HoustonGT

Gilded Gelding
Apr 6, 2003
1,418
0
0
Houston
Jan 14, 2007
#9
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #9
Did it on a a closed course at 4am with a passenger and the needle went past the 150 mark lol and stayed there for a good 3 seconds. Scary crap on a closed race course
 

jasonh_86

I
May 20, 2005
1,156
2
48
Arkansas
Jan 14, 2007
#10
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #10
I've gotten mine up there before. I was driving down I-40 at about 2am, when it was about 60* outside, with a buddy in the car. I got to 130mph and all it took was "dang.. see if you can hit 150" and I was talked into it... I went to 148-150, didn't see the exact spot, I was too focused on the road lol. That was before my headers and cams, when I had 3.73's and bolt-ons. It was a pretty intense feeling, but I haven't done it since and don't really care to
 

DBMSTNG

I fantasize about it being BIG!
Founding Member
Apr 23, 2002
2,120
0
56
not quite here
Jan 14, 2007
#11
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #11
all brakes suck at 140+mph. think you woulda been able to stop if something pulled out in front of you?
 

deftsound

Please ask me how much my supercharger cost
Apr 6, 2004
945
1
39
Texas City TX
Jan 14, 2007
#12
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #12
jimfitzgerald said:
Stupid.
Click to expand...

coming from the fastest 2v in the world
 

steveb24

New Member
Nov 28, 2005
555
0
0
wilmington, DE
Jan 14, 2007
#13
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #13
DBMSTNG said:
all brakes suck at 140+mph. think you woulda been able to stop if something pulled out in front of you?
Click to expand...

no.. thats why we did it with nothing in front of us
 
T

tornatic!!

New Member
Mar 27, 2006
7
0
0
Savannah, Ga
Jan 14, 2007
#14
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #14
hotmustang331 said:
Atleast you had the sence to do it when noone was around. Thats when I hit 148MPH myself...5 AM noone in front of me.
Sure its dangerous, but as long as you dont make a habbit of it, then I dont see much of a problem with it.

And man im surpirsed your car did that....mine was moving slowly past about 145 and that was with 248RWHP @ 600" elevation. Up to that point it was moving fast...mainly because I was going downward until around 145 HAHA.
Click to expand...

Yeah I wouldn't have done it if there were any cars around. I personally don't care what anybody thinks. If I wanted to drive myself off a cliff who's to stop me??

Man talk about a rush!! Especially when she hit 145 and kept climbing
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Jan 14, 2007
#15
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #15
wait J Fitz is here?

Yeah 140-150 in our cars w/ our suspension is just plain stupid. Even when i took out the Shelby GT-H w/ it's very tight suspension i only brought it up to 130
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Jan 14, 2007
#16
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #16
I've been in that situation before.

I was coming back from a trip to Maine on a Sunday afternoon and there was nobody on the road. I came over the crest of a hill on a 3-lane highway and you could see at least 2 miles ahead of you as it was a wide-open downhill stretch of road. When i say nobody was on the road, i mean NOBODY was there.

SO i said it was now or never and dropped the hammer and didn't let off til around 140ish. I used 4th gear though with stock 3.27's. It's amazing how stable the Mustang is at speed.

Last time i ever went that fast only because of the opportunity. I haven't been over 100MPH in about 2 years since
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
Jan 14, 2007
#17
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #17
I had mine up too 140mph last winter. She kept on going but I said 140 was enough and slowed back to 75. Seems like they will go 150mph stock with out a problem.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Jan 14, 2007
#18
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #18
Im a puss and only hit about 110 on the open highway.

Felt like I was doing 60, and was stilling pulling very nice. Id love to top it out once.
 

Rickey_Bobby

New Member
Nov 8, 2006
332
0
0
Sarasota, FL
Jan 14, 2007
#19
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #19
Little side note on the stock suspension and speed....
When I first got my turbo system dialed in we did a top gear run, Just left the car in 5th and floored it to see how the boost would come on over time. We started at 50mph and the car kept pulling harder and harder, so naturally I kept my foot down. Speedo was pegged and still going faster. GPS said or top speed was 188, and I started backing down because the top was starting to lift (there was a gap between the top of the windows and the convertable top) As I was slowing down, I crossed into the inside lane for an upcoming turn. That small side force caused the rear of the car to start swaying back and forth, sorta like a fish tail, but much MUCH slower, like right for 3 sec, the left for 3 sec. I coudln't figure out what was going on or how to correct it. I ended up just riding it out because I was afraid to apply the brakes if the car wasn't pointing dead nuts straight.
After getting home, I saw that there were wear marks on the exhaust from the inside of the rear tires. At rest there is 1.5" of clearance. That means the axle was going side to side at least 1.5"!!!! I still can't explain why the action was so slow, but I'm sure aerodynamics start getting complicated above 175mph.

A week later we did another run to 160. This time with a Panhard bar installed. What a differance!

So if your going to do a high speed run, make sure you dont change direction even the slightest bit...
 

dsg03bullitt

New Member
Jul 25, 2006
2
0
0
Jan 14, 2007
#20
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #20
Ive hit about one fiddy five before....took a lil bit to git there but she was climbing
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
922
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
98 GT PI Swapped Engine Fires, Dies Immediately NOT PATS
  • MMccPerformance
  • Dec 2, 2023
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 20, 2023
Yel2002GTAuto
Y
S
Engine ‘86 gt/ Auto. Low vacuum/ idle surge/ no leaks
  • skyboy666
  • May 19, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 9, 2021
jrichker
Fox Another Exhaust Question - For Stock Gt Fox
  • stoopalini
  • Jun 23, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 28, 2014
stoopalini
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?