• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

HOLLEY intake port to match heads???

  • Thread starter Thread starter FEESER 94 COBRA
  • Start date Start date Apr 14, 2004
F

FEESER 94 COBRA

New Member
Mar 5, 2004
142
0
0
Apr 14, 2004
#1
  • Apr 14, 2004
  • #1
Yes!!! just drove to my friends and pulled the Holley intake off.Its huge allso dirty.Is it worth taking the intake up to were my edelbrock rpm performer heads are being porter and get the intake ported to match the heads?Allso what T-Body my buddy has a 65mm it looked old so i didnt take it what about a70mm? Do i need to run a egr spacer??
 
3

331 cobra

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
398
0
0
Silicon Valley CA
Apr 14, 2004
#2
  • Apr 14, 2004
  • #2
You might want to grab that 65 if the price is right. If it's dirty and a little bit battered, you can probably make it look and work like new with a little elbow grease. You will also save money and have pride in the fact that you saved a piece of speed equipment.

That does not work if the part is really trashed and beyond repair, but how hard a life can a throttle body live?

Before you send the manifold out for the port match, line up a set of intake gaskets and see how much smaller the ports are. Some of the intakes are designed around the gasket, and you could just ask your head porter to open up your heads to that gasket size. On the other hand, if the gaskets don't match up and the price is low, it can't hurt.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Apr 14, 2004
#3
  • Apr 14, 2004
  • #3
I would not port the Holley anymore. Reason being - since the manifold is already designed to work in the 1500-6500 RPM range, it is already a little too much manifold for an NA 302. If you port it, you're going to shift that RPM range up higher, which will cause you to lose more low end torque than you would have if you would have kept it in box stock form.

Also, if you decide to go with the Holley, I would go with a 70mm TB. You're going to need all the air you can possibly get stuffed into that thing, and I think a 70mm would be a much better selection. You do not need to run an EGR spacer. Only pre-94 cars need to do that.

Joe
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Head gasket port matching plus head/intake port alignment
  • PonyGTrider
  • Dec 10, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
500
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 12, 2024
PonyGTrider
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
899
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Forced Induction Bypass valve backwards?
  • Dontknowchit
  • Jun 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
347
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 29, 2025
JD1964
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
729
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?