• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

How Bad Do Gears Kill gas mileage?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gargol139
  • Start date Start date Dec 4, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

DTMach1

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
240
0
0
Virginia Beach, VA
Dec 4, 2005
#21
  • Dec 4, 2005
  • #21
TurbLu said:
Just so you guys know, fuel consumption isnt just based on rpm. Its based on how much fuel it takes to keep the vehicle moving at the rate of velocity you've chosen for it. zzzzzzzzzzzzthis is why cars with 4.10 gears can achieve similar to better gas mileage than cars with stock gearing. Especially in an area with alot of hills and slopes. The car with the lower fd will have to modulate the gas the pedal alot more than a car with a higher final drive ratio. Remember tourqe is multiplied by the FD so you have more tourqe to use at the same level of throttle than before. Thus alot less load on the engine at the same speed and incline.
Click to expand...

yeah its not because I'm in 5th 80% of the time driving around town, where-as before I would've been in 4th or even 3rd....(just remember OD=wheels turning faster than motor therefore increased fuel economy)

fact of the matter is...if you're turning 3000rpm consistently for 10 minutes and then turn 2000rpm for another 10 minutes you would consume more gas at 3000rpm than you would've at 2000rpm...so I would say, yeah, RPM is a major factor in MPG.

If I spent all week driving back and forth to work in 4th gear, never shifting into 5th like I normally would, I guarantee my MPG would drop 2points.
 
T

TurbLu

New Member
Oct 29, 2005
22
0
0
Dec 5, 2005
#22
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #22
Not to argue with you but 4th gear ratio x Rear End Final Gear Ratio is alot higher than 5th gear x Rear End Final Drive Ratio. The true test would be to drive around town in 4th gear on both cars at the same speed and then see who gets better gas mileage. Im not saying RPM isnt a factor. Just saying it only applies to some of your mileage concerns.
 

DTMach1

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
240
0
0
Virginia Beach, VA
Dec 5, 2005
#23
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #23
TurbLu said:
Not to argue with you but 4th gear ratio x Rear End Final Gear Ratio is alot higher than 5th gear x Rear End Final Drive Ratio. The true test would be to drive around town in 4th gear on both cars at the same speed and then see who gets better gas mileage. Im not saying RPM isnt a factor. Just saying it only applies to some of your mileage concerns.
Click to expand...

of course it is...4th gear is your 1:1 ratio where the 5th gear will be your lowest(OD)...depending on trans would be somewhere around .62-.68...so no matter what your rear gear ratio, the tires would be spinning faster than the motor.

TO be honest If gas prices weren't so damned expensive I'd try the 4th gear thing...but **** that!!
 
T

thomas91169

I'd donkey punch my sister.
Aug 19, 2005
0
0
0
Modesto, CA
Dec 5, 2005
#24
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #24
who the **** cares? who buys a mustang and worries about their mileage anyways?
 

Stang|ess

seeking cyber partner(s)
Oct 18, 2003
941
0
37
Hawaii
Dec 5, 2005
#25
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #25
87 costs 2.65 and when i get 15 mpg it matters. Not everyone can be mister moneybags like you and not give a ****, but to the average joe, mpg matter.

On that note, do you guys use ac or what? I'm getting 15.8 mpg and its a combination of highway, and mild highway traffic.
 

BooWFO

New Member
May 10, 2005
991
0
0
Louisville, KY
Dec 5, 2005
#26
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #26
I need to check I just did a 240mile trip this weekend on 1 tank still got about a 1/4 tank in the car running about 77 mph the whole way. With 4.10's in a 04 5 spd.
In my normal driving which is combo city/highway/drag racing I get 20mpg. Last road trip I took running 80 the whole way I knocked down 24 and change MPG.
BTW with a 3650 tranny 3k should be 90mph.
 

Seraphitia102

will post boobie pics for a supercharger
Oct 11, 2004
737
1
16
California
Dec 5, 2005
#27
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #27
sgarlic said:
Still don't understang how you guys get 18-19 in the city. I get 14.9 consistantly.. and have since I drove it off the lot.
Click to expand...

I even tried driving like a grandma and still get around 15mpg.
 
T

TurbLu

New Member
Oct 29, 2005
22
0
0
Dec 5, 2005
#28
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #28
If your tuned check the tune your running. You'd be surprised how many tunned NA guys are running pig rich
 

Red35th

Member
Apr 18, 2003
609
2
19
Houston, TX
Dec 5, 2005
#29
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #29
My brother and I have pretty much the same cars, except he has 3.73s. I still have the stock gears and I followed him back and forth from Dallas last summer. I was about a quarter-mile behing him the whole way, so there was no real draft effect.

I got 24mpg on the trip, he only got 21mpg. Both cars were on cruise, it was the same way on the trip back.

Proof enough for me to keep my stockers.
 

langod

New Member
Apr 1, 2005
34
1
0
Londonderry, NH
Dec 5, 2005
#30
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #30
I drive mostly suburban and back roads. Very little highway.
When I put in my 3.90s, I dropped about 1 to 1.5 mpg average. My last couple of tanks averaged out to about 19 mpg. And this is with a Predator tune.
 
0

007

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2002
3,287
24
69
Broke
Dec 5, 2005
#31
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #31
Red35th said:
I got 24mpg on the trip, he only got 21mpg. Both cars were on cruise, it was the same way on the trip back.

Proof enough for me to keep my stockers.
Click to expand...

Oh God. In an auto too. Thats a retarded decision if I ever heard one. Sorry.crapola
 

wanta5.0

Founding Member
Jan 20, 2002
546
0
16
Dec 5, 2005
#32
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #32
Stang|ess said:
87 costs 2.65 and when i get 15 mpg it matters. Not everyone can be mister moneybags like you and not give a ****, but to the average joe, mpg matter.

On that note, do you guys use ac or what? I'm getting 15.8 mpg and its a combination of highway, and mild highway traffic.
Click to expand...

I get 18-20 with mixed driving. Do you get on your car non stop?
 

TheDamned

"I am Canadian and Damned for it!"
Jul 22, 2003
457
0
48
Montréal, Québec, Canada
Dec 5, 2005
#33
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #33
I do 180miles with a full tank.... gettin gears would be DEADLY amnit:
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
Dec 5, 2005
#34
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #34
guys, guys come now DONT FEAR THE GEAR
 

Red35th

Member
Apr 18, 2003
609
2
19
Houston, TX
Dec 6, 2005
#35
  • Dec 6, 2005
  • #35
007 said:
Oh God. In an auto too. Thats a retarded decision if I ever heard one. Sorry.crapola
Click to expand...
Considering how I'm happy with my ET and MPH it's really a non-factor. If I was NA I'm sure that I would want gears, right now they would do me virtually no good.
 
0

007

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2002
3,287
24
69
Broke
Dec 6, 2005
#36
  • Dec 6, 2005
  • #36
Red35th said:
Considering how I'm happy with my ET and MPH it's really a non-factor. If I was NA I'm sure that I would want gears, right now they would do me virtually no good.
Click to expand...

Youre ET on the juice is great (although gears would help that 60 foot), but you arent squirting that stuff all day long... All the rest of the time you are driving an NA car, and the stock auto gearing is WAY WAY too long.
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
Dec 6, 2005
#37
  • Dec 6, 2005
  • #37
007 said:
and the stock auto gearing is WAY WAY too long.
Click to expand...

that is so true that is why i got my gears now it revs faster into the power band and through the gear itself
 
S

saleen556

New Member
Dec 2, 2003
387
0
0
Hillsboro,OR
Dec 6, 2005
#38
  • Dec 6, 2005
  • #38
I understand that gas prices have sucked lately but the mustang isn't meant to be economical.If I was worried about gas milage I would have got a honda.
 

96BlueStangGT

Member
Jul 7, 2004
38
0
16
Southern Indiana
Dec 6, 2005
#39
  • Dec 6, 2005
  • #39
On the interstate going 75 at 2800 rpms with a T45, I get about 19-20 mpg. I don't care about gas milage though. The fun of driving a Stang is worth it.
 

sgarlic

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2001
3,085
1
56
Dec 6, 2005
#40
  • Dec 6, 2005
  • #40
Seraphitia102 said:
I even tried driving like a grandma and still get around 15mpg.
Click to expand...

Bout time somebody finally admits they get crappy MPG too. Drive down here to Tucson and spend one tank of gas driving in normal traffic here.. I bet it's the same as me. I've tried every thing I could think of, nothing makes a difference.

I think the single best post in this thread so far has been the, "Who buys a Mustang and worries about the gas mileage."
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
4.10 gears = 200,000 miles ?
  • michaelleewebb
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
215
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Apr 2, 2026
michaelleewebb
M
1999 Mustang GT - No Start- Need help understanding the fuel pump circuit and how it works
  • 99gtGuy
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
527
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 7, 2025
04newedge-
0
B
2001 roush stage 3 - sat for 5 years
  • Brando_05
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
259
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2025
Brando_05
B
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
765
Digital Self-tuning Forum Yesterday at 10:08 AM
X-cam34
X
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?