• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Engine How far can you go with an A9L (or other) factory computer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter reddy351
  • Start date Start date Oct 31, 2022
Status
Not open for further replies.
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

reddy351

10 Year Member
Jun 13, 2006
560
12
38
Columbus, Ohio
Oct 31, 2022
#1
  • Oct 31, 2022
  • #1
I have a 94 GT engine that I'm going to use the stock cam with some 1.7 rockers, a pair of AFR 185 Enforcers and an Explorer manifold. What would I need to do to make these work with an A9L computer? I really don't plan on adding any other performance stuff in the future or I'd take the steep learning curve on a MegaSquirt. (I really don't want to do that.)

My plan is to get a Painless harness and A9L for the swap as I'm not running it in a Mustang. The reason for using the stock cam is to keep a stock-ish idle, which I prefer and the heads are there for the slight performance improvement AND the saved 40# off the front of the car.

This is not the typical "bigger is better" combo. Just a nice, reliable/tractable combo that I can enjoy driving every day.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,947
10,585
203
polk county florida
Oct 31, 2022
#2
  • Oct 31, 2022
  • #2
Stock computer (A9L) will be just fine with that combo, the important thing, more so since this is a swap to another body/chassis is to duplicate the computer grounds in the harness like it was going into a mustang.
Do not 'stack' the grounds together in one place. They are separated for a reason (although I couldn't tell you why, maybe something about 'feed back'?)
This opinion is based on threads of problems I've read about here during the couple minutes I've been a member here and not based on any real mechanical experience
 
Reactions: reddy351

nickyb

I gotta say i never painted my nuts, Never Ever
15 Year Member
Apr 3, 2009
2,979
1,626
153
nevada
Oct 31, 2022
#3
  • Oct 31, 2022
  • #3
If your dead set on using that exploder intake then don't waste your money on the afr185's.
That intake will choke down the heads.I
This is based on my own research, feel free to Do as you please.
 

96pushrod

I think they're a little easier to get off
5 Year Member
May 15, 2018
1,530
871
133
Savannah
Oct 31, 2022
#4
  • Oct 31, 2022
  • #4
By the time you buy a harness and a9l, you pretty much could just get a terminator x - as it comes with a harness. If you already have all the stuff you listed then it doesn’t really matter I suppose.

Not that it won’t work with a a9l, but they’re almost all going to be at least 30 years old at this point.
 

reddy351

10 Year Member
Jun 13, 2006
560
12
38
Columbus, Ohio
Oct 31, 2022
#5
  • Oct 31, 2022
  • #5
nickyb said:
If your dead set on using that exploder intake then don't waste your money on the afr185's.
That intake will choke down the heads.I
This is based on my own research, feel free to Do as you please.
Click to expand...


Do you suggest I spend $800 on an aftermarket one that will do a tiny bit better than the Explorer? The Explorer is way better than the stock GT intake, no?
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,140
21,313
234
Box behind Walmart
Oct 31, 2022
#6
  • Oct 31, 2022
  • #6
reddy351 said:
Do you suggest I spend $800 on an aftermarket one that will do a tiny bit better than the Explorer?
Click to expand...
Yes. At some point although not an emergency.
 

reddy351

10 Year Member
Jun 13, 2006
560
12
38
Columbus, Ohio
Oct 31, 2022
#7
  • Oct 31, 2022
  • #7
Noobz347 said:
Yes. At some point although not an emergency.
Click to expand...
Other than the fact that it’s just an ugly intake, how can you say that, not knowing my goals or intentions?
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,947
10,585
203
polk county florida
Oct 31, 2022
#8
  • Oct 31, 2022
  • #8
Budget build cruiser for car shows and schlep'n around town the explorer is fine, just don't expect much after about 5500rpms, if you're going for that extra humph to get your heart rate up pulling away in traffic pick a better cam and intake.
Stock cam, 1.7's and the explorer intake in a light body (you didn't say what you were putting it in?) makes for a spunky ride.
JMO
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,140
21,313
234
Box behind Walmart
Oct 31, 2022
#9
  • Oct 31, 2022
  • #9
reddy351 said:
Other than the fact that it’s just an ugly intake, how can you say that, not knowing my goals or intentions?
Click to expand...
Because it's the combination of parts that you get the most from. Even if you boost it, you'll get more power from a larger intake with those heads.
 

89notchDude

Active Member
Apr 11, 2022
84
42
28
central NJ
Oct 31, 2022
#10
  • Oct 31, 2022
  • #10
Neomustang on YT runs the A9L and he's in the 9's.
 

reddy351

10 Year Member
Jun 13, 2006
560
12
38
Columbus, Ohio
Nov 1, 2022
#11
  • Nov 1, 2022
  • #11
Noobz347 said:
Because it's the combination of parts that you get the most from. Even if you boost it, you'll get more power from a larger intake with those heads.
Click to expand...


Read my first post: "This is not the typical "bigger is better" combo. Just a nice, reliable/tractable combo that I can enjoy driving every day."

I doubt I will EVER boost it. If I do, I'll have a functioning system with a new harness to build on.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,029
1,621
194
NJ
Nov 1, 2022
#12
  • Nov 1, 2022
  • #12
To answer your first question, i've seen the stock a9l handle 650rwhp+. No chip, no tuning.
Is that the right way to go? Since this sounds like an engine swap and you would be buying a harness and computer anyway, i'd probably say no.
I'm a fan of just a stock a9l, but i don't think i would acquire an aftermarket harness, then a used ecu and install it all when you could buy a terminator X setup.

As for your combination of parts.
I'd be very surprised if it ran well.
You are basically buying the biggest set of heads and slapping them on a 302 with 302 supporting parts.
If this is your plan, save yourself a ton of money, buy some used gt40x or gt40y heads, have them valve jobbed and run them.
The results will be similar and you could just run the stock 94 harness and computer.
 

reddy351

10 Year Member
Jun 13, 2006
560
12
38
Columbus, Ohio
Nov 1, 2022
#13
  • Nov 1, 2022
  • #13
The AFR Enforcers are very close to the GT40x heads, from what I've seen. The "AFR185" are very different from the AFR185 Enforcer". The Enforcers (that I have) are an "as cast" head. The AFR185 are CNC ported. They are worlds apart, different.
 
Last edited: Nov 1, 2022

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,140
21,313
234
Box behind Walmart
Nov 1, 2022
#14
  • Nov 1, 2022
  • #14
reddy351 said:
Read my first post: "This is not the typical "bigger is better" combo. Just a nice, reliable/tractable combo that I can enjoy driving every day."

I doubt I will EVER boost it. If I do, I'll have a functioning system with a new harness to build on.
Click to expand...
You read your first post. You can stack a scooter induction system if you like. Nobody is telling you that you can't.

It just doesn't make much sense to run one of the larger/better-flowing heads on the car and then choke it down.

But hey... There's a dude on Youtube that runs a V8 through single-barrel Chinese lawn mower carb. He gets great fuel mileage.



Ah! Here it is:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmPtCmL-Ldw&ab_channel=ThunderHead289


 
Reactions: General karthief

reddy351

10 Year Member
Jun 13, 2006
560
12
38
Columbus, Ohio
Nov 1, 2022
#15
  • Nov 1, 2022
  • #15
I think you're getting a little too emotionally involved this project. I asked for an opinion. I got yours. I took it into consideration and will move forward based on that consideration. We may not agree but, no worries, we'll both be ok.

Thank you for getting involved in the conversation.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,947
10,585
203
polk county florida
Nov 1, 2022
#16
  • Nov 1, 2022
  • #16
reddy351 said:
I think you're getting a little too emotionally involved this project. I asked for an opinion. I got yours. I took it into consideration and will move forward based on that consideration. We may not agree but, no worries, we'll both be ok.

Thank you for getting involved in the conversation.
Click to expand...
Just giving opinions and offering options, you do know you can't run those heads with stock pistons? That's what I gathered from their website anyway (if I read it correctly), like I stated in post #8, you also didn't say what this is going in or anything else about the build just the parts you plan on using for the engine which will be ok, good till about 5000 to 5500 rpms, the explorer intake is good for low end torque but the heads are for a little higher rpm, the stock cam even with the 1.7 rockers are, again, better suited for low end torque, it's a little miss matched. It will, like I said be ok for cruising around town but it will quickly run outta steam when the go peddle is applied.
We are giving you advice with what little info you're giving,
You had a thread back in Jan this about this combo.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Nov 1, 2022
#17
  • Nov 1, 2022
  • #17
IIRC, the cam profiles are what messes with the (untuned) A9L the most, usually the idle quality. Depending on how radical you get determines how well the A9L can adapt without being tuned. I've seen the A9L run some pretty wild combos provided the cam is not too radical.

A9L tuning is getting a 2nd wind it seems, especially if you follow Leech Motorsports. With tuning, it seems this is not an issue.
 
Reactions: reddy351

reddy351

10 Year Member
Jun 13, 2006
560
12
38
Columbus, Ohio
Nov 1, 2022
#18
  • Nov 1, 2022
  • #18
General karthief said:
Just giving opinions and offering options, you do know you can't run those heads with stock pistons? That's what I gathered from their website anyway (if I read it correctly), like I stated in post #8, you also didn't say what this is going in or anything else about the build just the parts you plan on using for the engine which will be ok, good till about 5000 to 5500 rpms, the explorer intake is good for low end torque but the heads are for a little higher rpm, the stock cam even with the 1.7 rockers are, again, better suited for low end torque, it's a little miss matched. It will, like I said be ok for cruising around town but it will quickly run outta steam when the go peddle is applied.
We are giving you advice with what little info you're giving,
You had a thread back in Jan this about this combo.
Click to expand...

I sure did have a thread. I needed a new thread because I was not going to use the A9L back then.

I haven't seen anywhere that says I can't use these heads with stock pistons. (Mine isn't a 1986.) It's a cheap China casting with decent hardware, made to bolt onto a stock bottom end. Not sure why every write up would fail to mention needing to swap pistons.

Since you've read the installation manual, you'll know that these are designed for use UP TO 6000 rpm. Well within the parameters of 1) my needs and 2) the other hard parts in the system.

The Explorer intake flows around 200cfm. These heads at .500 lift flow 255cfm. My stock cam is definitely going to be the "bottleneck" in this combo and then the intake. And I'm good with that.
 
Last edited: Nov 1, 2022

reddy351

10 Year Member
Jun 13, 2006
560
12
38
Columbus, Ohio
Nov 1, 2022
#19
  • Nov 1, 2022
  • #19
Mustang5L5 said:
IIRC, the cam profiles are what messes with the (untuned) A9L the most, usually the idle quality. Depending on how radical you get determines how well the A9L can adapt without being tuned. I've seen the A9L run some pretty wild combos provided the cam is not too radical.

A9L tuning is getting a 2nd wind it seems, especially if you follow Leech Motorsports. With tuning, it seems this is not an issue.
Click to expand...

It is funny how 20 years later, here we go again. Lol.

Once this is up and running with a NEW harness, if I decide to go bigger someday, I'll go the MegaSquirt "Plug and Play" route and do the cam and intake as well. At that point, everything in the engine management will be new.
 
Last edited: Nov 1, 2022

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,822
929
143
Nov 1, 2022
#20
  • Nov 1, 2022
  • #20
General karthief said:
you also didn't say what this is going in
Click to expand...
Agreed, but I am not sure it matters.

Lets read between the lines and the picture

reddy351 said:
My plan is to get a Painless harness and A9L for the swap as I'm not running it in a Mustang.
Click to expand...
So none Mustang - so stand alone harness and computer.

And from his picture I would guess a Merkur XR4Ti with a 5 speed (A9L not P).


My opinion, cam will fall off before the intake does. Should have good street manners and be easy to cruise around with. Should make 300-350 at the crank (assuming electric fans). Sounds fun.
 
Reactions: reddy351
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
752
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
209
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
522
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
740
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?